On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 01:05, Beast wrote:
> At 11:10 AM 1/3/2003 -0800, you wrote:
> >If you build a single master system and replicate to the other three
> >offices, you'll be able to authenticate in the event of a link failure,
> >but you won't be able to modify the directory (change passwords).
At 11:10 AM 1/3/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 10:39, Beast wrote:
>> Server design:
>> all sites are connected using leased line, so problem in links should not
>> interupt user in one site to authenticate(or modify their password) to
>> their own ldap server, but all servers in all
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 10:39, Beast wrote:
> Server design:
> all sites are connected using leased line, so problem in links should not
> interupt user in one site to authenticate(or modify their password) to
> their own ldap server, but all servers in all sites should be synch.
>
> What is the bes
At 10:39 PM 12/20/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>
>> ldap = is it proven techology for this purpose?
>>
>
> LDAP is a general purpose thing now, you can really put anything in
>LDAP. LDAP from companies such as Sun (Sun ONE Directory Server) have
>extra plugins and if you don't mind using one of th
Check this out, it has an excellent howto and some needed tools for nt
integration.
http://samba.idealx.org/
I wish I found it before I spent months putting together our single
signon solution. I'm currently contributing to their webmin module for
ldap user management.
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 05:
On 21-Dec-2002/13:10 +, Beast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>2. Currently we have MS Exchange installed, user was using mapi which give
>good full list of recipient. i think we can achieve it using ldap, even
>user have to search first. exchange were made it simple and make user very
>lazy to type
Hello !
> 1. What is 'standart' file sharing? nfs, smb/samba or any other?
"Standart" interesting terminology, depends, NFS is useful to what we
call mount a file system partition onto another machine, so you could
simple export the entire /home where all the user home directories may
exi
At 10:39 PM 12/20/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>> ldap = is it proven techology for this purpose?
>>
>
> LDAP is a general purpose thing now, you can really put anything in
>LDAP. LDAP from companies such as Sun (Sun ONE Directory Server) have
>extra plugins and if you don't mind using one of thos
Hello !
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 04:06, Beast wrote:
> Currently what im thinking was nis, samba and ldap (using openldap)
> nis = seem mature, is it worth in today environment?
NIS/NIS+ is a dying model, soon you will see Sun even doing LDAP
instead of NIS/NIS+ that is the way to go today.
At 08:49 PM 12/20/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Depends on what you want to be doing, I mean that there is LDAP
>authentication that would be useful for certain/most tasks, using Samba
>and LDAP would be a wonderful way to do some things like NT
>Authentication.
>
>De facto would be /etc/passwd style but
Depends on what you want to be doing, I mean that there is LDAP
authentication that would be useful for certain/most tasks, using Samba
and LDAP would be a wonderful way to do some things like NT
Authentication.
De facto would be /etc/passwd style but since you want to be central in
account and re
Hi all,
recently we're trying moving from window nt network to linux. we have
arround 800-1000 pc client.
1. what are my options to replace ntdomain authentiation?
2. what is de facto standard to maintain account in *nix world?
TIA.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
12 matches
Mail list logo
