Re: dhcpd is a bit limited...

2002-04-18 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greg Conway wrote: >(a) delete leases if necessary! What do you mean by ``delete leases''? - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with p

Re: dhcpd is a bit limited...

2002-04-18 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 4/18/2002 12:44 PM -0400, you wrote: >host { >hardware ethernet ; >fixed-address ; >} > >Of course, do not put in the <>s. And note that the fixed addresses should not be inside the dynamically-assigned range to avoid duplication. That is, if you want to assign 101-110 always to the same b

Re: dhcpd is a bit limited...

2002-04-18 Thread Mike Burger
host { hardware ethernet ; fixed-address ; } Of course, do not put in the <>s. On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > At 4/18/2002 04:31 PM +0100, you wrote: > >Can anybody recommend an updated DHCP server for linux? > > Have you checked that you're using the latest version from the R

Re: dhcpd is a bit limited...

2002-04-18 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 4/18/2002 04:31 PM +0100, you wrote: >Can anybody recommend an updated DHCP server for linux? Have you checked that you're using the latest version from the Red Hat updates site? >The stock dhcpd is okay, but I was looking for something more sophisticated, >that would let us... > >(b) enter

dhcpd is a bit limited...

2002-04-18 Thread Greg Conway
Hi all, Can anybody recommend an updated DHCP server for linux? The stock dhcpd is okay, but I was looking for something more sophisticated, that would let us... (b) enter reservations (a) delete leases if necessary! I am replacing a Win2K Server with a Linux one, and can't believe windoze off