I'm in the process of switching ISPs. One that I'm considering offers a
Cisco 687 DSL router. When I went to the Cisco site, I saw that this
router is unsupported and past "end of life." Is this a bad choice based
on being past end of life or is this router a solid product that should
give me
Gary Stainburn wrote:
Hi folks,
I don't know if this is a linux problem or a Cisco one.
I've got a Cisco 801 configured to dial-on-demand to a fleet management
clearing house. If I telnet to the cisco and use the 'connect' command to
pull down a web page it dials out, connects and then returns
80 32 60 43
> Fax : 03 84 54 35 50
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Gary Stainburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : lundi 24 février 2003 11:35
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Laurent didier
> Objet : Re: Linux Firewall and Cisco Router
>
>
> On Monday 24 Febr
]; Laurent didier
Objet : Re: Linux Firewall and Cisco Router
On Monday 24 February 2003 9:41 am, Laurent didier wrote:
qq> have you an DNS resolution
No, but that shouldn't matter as I'm using IP address notation, i.e.
wget http://10.10.1.100/index.html
which relates to the followi
)
> FORLAN (http://www.forlan.com)
> tél : 03 84 21 00 10
> Gsm : 06 80 32 60 43
> Fax : 03 84 54 35 50
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Gary Stainburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : lundi 24 février 2003 10:36
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Linux Fir
21 00 10
Gsm : 06 80 32 60 43
Fax : 03 84 54 35 50
-Message d'origine-
De : Gary Stainburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 24 février 2003 10:36
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Linux Firewall and Cisco Router
Hi folks,
I don't know if this is a linux problem or a Cisco
Hi folks,
I don't know if this is a linux problem or a Cisco one.
I've got a Cisco 801 configured to dial-on-demand to a fleet management
clearing house. If I telnet to the cisco and use the 'connect' command to
pull down a web page it dials out, connects and then returns the web page.
I've g
Thanks to ALL that replied...
the ntpdate works like a charm...
Thanks again
Dave
At 11:24 AM 1/25/2003 -0800, you wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Dave Lewis wrote:
> it seems that rdate doesn't work with the cisco protocol..
rdate != ntp. If your cisco router is already using ntp, a
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Dave Lewis wrote:
> it seems that rdate doesn't work with the cisco protocol..
rdate != ntp. If your cisco router is already using ntp, and isn't
blocking queries, use ntpdate or run ntpd instead.
--
"Of course I'm in shape! Round's a shape, i
Try ntpdate instead of rdate. I am pretty sure rdate will not work,
however I am sure that ntpdate and ntp sync'ing does.
Dave Lewis wrote:
Has anyone tried syncing their clocks with a local cisco device
providing NTP.
it seems that rdate doesn't work with the cisco protocol..
Has anyone got
Has anyone tried syncing their clocks with a local cisco device providing NTP.
it seems that rdate doesn't work with the cisco protocol..
Has anyone gotten another program to work in this type of configuration ??
I've tried several including chrony and I can't get anything to work.
However my wi
se it to configure my
cisco router for the 1st time. It is connected to my pc in port
serial
(com 2)
Please do not hesitate to tell me the detail instruction.
thank you verymuch
regards,
jimmy
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm still new using Red hat 7.2, and I want to use it to configure my
cisco router for the 1st time. It is connected to my pc in port serial
(com 2)
Please do not hesitate to tell me the detail instruction.
thank you verymuch
regards,
Check out the cards at www.sangoma.com for some options. I have used their
cards for 5 years now.
Warren
-Original Message-
From: Moke Tsing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:56 AM
To: Redhat-List (E-mail)
Subject: Replacing Cisco Router with Linux Box (Leased
Hi,
Any one have any idea to replace a route with Linux.
NAT and Setting should not have any problem but the thing that really tied
me down is the V.35 cable from the NT1 from the leased-line.
Anyone have ever successfully link a NT1 directly to a Linux Box??
Thanks and regards
Moke
Hi,
Any one have any idea to replace a route with Linux.
NAT and Setting should not have any problem but the thing that really tied
me down is the V.35 cable from the NT1 from the leased-line.
Anyone have ever successfully link a NT1 directly to a Linux Box??
Thanks and regards
Moke
__
What are you trying to do?
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
use tc command
- Original Message -
From: lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: cisco router
>
> hi!
>
> ...just like to ask, is there a way to limit/reduced the bandwidth of an
> ethernet
]>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 2:28 AM
Subject: cisco router
>
> hi!
>
> ...just like to ask, is there a way to limit/reduced the bandwidth of an
> ethernet connection, which basically transmitt 10Mbps. sorry if this is
> nothing to do with linux...i guess some of you guy
thanks.if so.. how can it be done. let say a linux machine...
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Hossein S. Zadeh wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, lord wrote:
>
> > ...just like to ask, is there a way to limit/reduced the bandwidth of an
> > ethernet connection, which basically transmitt 10Mbps. sorry if this i
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, lord wrote:
> ...just like to ask, is there a way to limit/reduced the bandwidth of an
> ethernet connection, which basically transmitt 10Mbps. sorry if this is
> nothing to do with linux...i guess some of you guys out there knew
> something about this...pls help.
Speaking
hi!
...just like to ask, is there a way to limit/reduced the bandwidth of an
ethernet connection, which basically transmitt 10Mbps. sorry if this is
nothing to do with linux...i guess some of you guys out there knew
something about this...pls help.
Thank You.
_
Darryl:
Thanks,
That did the trick. Really appreciate your help.
Eddie
- Original Message -
From: Darryl Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Eddie Strohmier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: Cisco router logging
At 11:01 AM 21/06/2000, you wrote:
>I don't think my first message was clear but I will give it a go again. I
>have remote logging running so I can receive my cisco router logging events.
>I receive the logging details in /var/log/messages but I want to modify my
>syslog.conf
I don't think my first message was clear but I will give it a go again. I
have remote logging running so I can receive my cisco router logging events.
I receive the logging details in /var/log/messages but I want to modify my
syslog.conf file so that only the remote messages from the router
gging and was curious as to the
> syntax for the syslog.conf file to allow one to log cisco router packet
> movement to a specified file such as /var/log/cisco_log. I already have
> remote logging working but all the logging currently goes to
> /var/log/messages. I have not modified my s
Hello:
I was following the thread on remote logging and was curious as to the
syntax for the syslog.conf file to allow one to log cisco router packet
movement to a specified file such as /var/log/cisco_log. I already have
remote logging working but all the logging currently goes to
/var/log
27 matches
Mail list logo
