Re: bug in iptables

2002-08-03 Thread pd3
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 09:06:59AM +0200, Aad van Lieburg wrote: > Hi, > I read about a bug in RH7.2 iptables, due to debugging code, with NAT / > mangle. > Now I'm not sure about this: Is this bug still there in RH7.3? > >From www.netfilter.org homepage: * This bug has not yet been fixed in any

bug in iptables

2002-08-02 Thread Aad van Lieburg
Hi, I read about a bug in RH7.2 iptables, due to debugging code, with NAT / mangle. Now I'm not sure about this: Is this bug still there in RH7.3? smime.p7s Description: application/pkcs7-signature

Re: Probably bug in Iptables, I think

2001-12-07 Thread Redhat mailing list
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Mike Burger wrote: > Did you, at any point, do an "iptables save"? yes i did. I missed somthing on flushing the rules. I only flushed the chains and missed the tables (nat, filter). > If so, you'll need to edit /etc/sysconfig/iptables, and comment out or > remove the dna

Re: Probably bug in Iptables, I think

2001-12-07 Thread Mike Burger
Did you, at any point, do an "iptables save"? If so, you'll need to edit /etc/sysconfig/iptables, and comment out or remove the dnat rules, there. Then, run "service iptables restart", which will cause iptables to reload the saved configuration. Works well for me. On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Redhat

Probably bug in Iptables, I think

2001-12-07 Thread Redhat mailing list
HI folks, Im using iptables and successfully configured it to be my packet filtering firewall. I've configured nat (DNAT) to forward http, smtp and dns request to servers inside my firewall. However, I want to disable dnat for some reason. But I can't disable it. I remove the dnat rules and r