Hi Win
Thank you for your reply
RH7.3 can't boot in single and multple user. It hanged on
kernel=cleanfreememory 138
I checked google that the problem is about corruption of file halt
I only boot linux=/sbin/init but it is in read only
I can't move /sbin/halt and copy new one to replace it
D
TO mount to the correct /root partition, you can pass kernel parameters if
you use LILO boot manager when u see LILO prompt. Such as
LILOboot: linux root=/dev/hda_X
When RH8.0 booting is OK, make sure not to mount RH7.3 / as RH8.0's mount
point for checking filesytems on RH7.3. Checking moun
You must declare your rh8 mount point in /etc/fstab,
and then, you must go to /etc/lilo.conf and write on
it the new /dev/hdc.
To mount your RH 7,3 try mount -t file_system
/dev/hdaXY /mount_point
Where X is your hard disk, and Y your partition number
--- chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Hi
Hi all
My Redhat 7.3 can't boot and has problem
Now I am using another RH8.0
I take this problem Redhat 7.3 harddisk out and then install it as
secondary drive (hdc) of RH8.0
But I couldn't boot in RH8.0 because it said it can't mount the /
The RH8.0 might recognize RH7.3 as it / when it is boo
Hi all
My Redhat 7.3 can't boot and has problem
Now I am using another RH8.0
I take this problem Redhat 7.3 harddisk out and then install it as
secondary drive (hdc) of RH8.0
But I couldn't boot in RH8.0 because it said it can't mount the /
The RH8.0 might recognize RH7.3 as it / when it is boo
Michael
> > I am having a problem building a new kernel for a MSI 845E Max
> > Motherboard. I am running RH9.0 and rebuilding a 2.4.20 kernel.
> >
> > The problem appears to be with the HDD/CD-ROM controller (an
> > ICH4 on an Intel 845E chipset) of the IDE hard-drive (WD 40GB
> > IDE/7200). W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 29 May 2003 01:40:30 -0600, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
> I am having a problem building a new kernel for a MSI 845E Max
> Motherboard. I am running RH9.0 and rebuilding a 2.4.20 kernel.
>
> The problem appears to be with the HDD/CD-ROM controlle
Hello Redhat list
I am having a problem building a new kernel for a MSI 845E Max
Motherboard. I am running RH9.0 and rebuilding a 2.4.20 kernel.
The problem appears to be with the HDD/CD-ROM controller (an
ICH4 on an Intel 845E chipset) of the IDE hard-drive (WD 40GB
IDE/7200). When I boot my
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:56:33AM -0800, Jeffrey Lawton wrote:
> Does anyone have any specific knowledge HOW BAD a problem this could be
> indicating? Sure it doesn't ID the PCI bridge chip (assumes it's
> transparent - probably a bad assumption), but also (perhaps as a
> result?) it doesn't find
Does anyone have any specific knowledge HOW BAD a problem this could be
indicating? Sure it doesn't ID the PCI bridge chip (assumes it's
transparent - probably a bad assumption), but also (perhaps as a
result?) it doesn't find my RTC registers, can't start the audio mixer,
doesn't know what to do w
I have installed xosl to select booting from win or
linux.
--- kevinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > Hello !
> I've just installed Red Hat 7.2...
> I've installed grub but I've got a problem to boot
> under Windows XP (NTFS format).
> Is there a way to solve this problem ?
___
Hello !
I've just installed Red Hat 7.2...
I've installed grub but I've got a problem to
boot under Windows XP (NTFS format).
Is there a way to solve this problem
?
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 23:21:19 -0500
Steve Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just reinstalled AGAIN but without the "Grub" and it works ok now
> with LILO. What is up with Grub that would cause this? BTW,
> something that I didn't mention before was that the error and lockup
> that I was get
I just reinstalled AGAIN but without the "Grub" and it works ok now with
LILO. What is up with Grub that would cause this? BTW, something that I
didn't mention before was that the error and lockup that I was getting
happens AFTER the GRUB screen comes up and I try to start the system.
Steve
Ed
Yes, it is 2 SCSI Hard Drives on a Raid 1 system.
Thanks For your Help
Steve
At 11:16 AM 9/20/2002 +0800, you wrote:
> > >Mounting root filesystem
> > >mount: error 6 mounting ext3
> > >pivotroot: pivot_root(/sysroot,/sysroot/initrd) failed: 2
> > >Freeing unused kernel memory: 280K
8 AM
Subject: Re: New Install Boot Problem
> At 6:12 PM -0500 9/19/02, Steve Buehler wrote:
> >I have just installed RedHat 7.3 on a server and get the following
> >error during boot and the system just stops there:
> >
> >Mounting root filesystem
> >mount: e
a google search brought up this on "mount: error 6 mounting ext3"
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Operating_Systems/Linux/Linux_Administration
/Q_20304316.html
don't know if it will help, may want to do some more "www.google.com"
searching (using the quotation marks, otherwise you'll get "billio
> >Mounting root filesystem
> >mount: error 6 mounting ext3
> >pivotroot: pivot_root(/sysroot,/sysroot/initrd) failed: 2
> >Freeing unused kernel memory: 280K freed
> >Kernel panic: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel.
> >
> >Everything before that seems fine.
> >I have installed th
At 6:12 PM -0500 9/19/02, Steve Buehler wrote:
>I have just installed RedHat 7.3 on a server and get the following
>error during boot and the system just stops there:
>
>Mounting root filesystem
>mount: error 6 mounting ext3
>pivotroot: pivot_root(/sysroot,/sysroot/initrd) failed: 2
>Freeing unus
I have just installed RedHat 7.3 on a server and get the following error
during boot and the system just stops there:
Mounting root filesystem
mount: error 6 mounting ext3
pivotroot: pivot_root(/sysroot,/sysroot/initrd) failed: 2
Freeing unused kernel memory: 280K freed
Kernel panic: No init fou
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 11 de setembro de 2002 13:50
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: Re: RH 7.3 boot problem after installing with adaptec 2940
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Leandro J. Kohler wrote:
> Does anybody knows something about a problem that I can finished
installing
> rh 7.3 on a machin
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Leandro J. Kohler wrote:
> Does anybody knows something about a problem that I can finished installing
> rh 7.3 on a machine with SCSI Adaptec 2940 but the system can't boot after
> installing ?
Probably the mkinitrd was not properly created, and the needed
SCSI driver is n
Hello,
Does anybody knows something about a problem that I can finished installing
rh 7.3 on a machine with SCSI Adaptec 2940 but the system can't boot after
installing ?
Thanks
Leandro J. Kohler
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://l
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Doron Tordjman wrote:
> Ok, this will be fun... I'm having a boot problem with Redhat 7.1.
> Everything seems to load properly until I'm about to get to the XWindows
> logon screen... at which point the screen just keeps flickering. Any ideas
> how t
On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 18:19, Doron Tordjman wrote:
> Ok, this will be fun... I'm having a boot problem with Redhat 7.1.
> Everything seems to load properly until I'm about to get to the XWindows
> logon screen... at which point the screen just keeps flickering. Any ideas
>
Ok, this will be fun... I'm having a boot problem with Redhat 7.1.
Everything seems to load properly until I'm about to get to the XWindows
logon screen... at which point the screen just keeps flickering. Any ideas
how to fix that? I'm almost at a point to r
I usually see this after compiling the kernel without running LILO. A
bootdisk running GRUB should work fine to fix this. If it's the 1024
problem, I think after booting you can add an option to lilo.conf and
rerun lilo.
Or you could just keep the bootloader on a floppy permanently.
Jon
On S
On 07/27/02 12:11 -0400, Matthew Scarrow wrote:
> I have setup RedHat 7.2 on a Promise RAID controller.
>
> When I reboot for the first time I get LI and that's it. Anyone got
> suggestions on what's wrong. Thanks.
Check and see, but most likely your boot partition is located above
cylinder 1024
I have setup RedHat 7.2 on a Promise RAID controller.
When I reboot for the first time I get LI and that's it. Anyone got
suggestions on what's wrong. Thanks.
Matthew Scarrow
ComIT Solutions Inc.
www.comit.ca
Phone: 519-442-0100
Fax: 519-442-0429
__
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Hard drive boot problem
>
>
> Yes, I could always boot from the floppy. I found the
> solution, scary as it
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 05 June 2002 06:00 am, Chris Mason wrote:
> The problem is not getting RIAD to work, I've abandoned that idea, the
> problem is I can't gt the hard drives to work not that I have ditched the
> RAID card. I beleive it altered the MRB so th
]
Yahoo:netconcepts_anguilla
US Fax and Voicemail: (605)253-1759
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Ellis
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:08 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Hard drive boot problem
Chris,
Did you happen to make a
, 2002 8:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Hard drive boot problem
The problem is not getting RIAD to work, I've abandoned that idea, the
problem is I can't gt the hard drives to work not that I have ditched the
RAID card. I beleive it altered the MRB so that the drives do not boo
5)253-1759
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jonathan M. Slivko
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Hard drive boot problem
> Just a rackmount 3U case with a Asus TUV4X motherboard. Is that relevant?
&g
Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: June 4, 2002 3:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hard drive boot problem
Just took delivery of a rack mount server with an Adaptec 1200A RAID
controller and two 80GB IDE drives.
The RAID conntroller does not work with Linux, so I am ditching it. However,
when
ay, June 04, 2002 3:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Hard drive boot problem
>
>
>
>
> > Just took delivery of a rack mount server with an Adaptec 1200A RAID
> > controller and two 80GB IDE drives.
> >
> > The RAID conntroller does not work with
Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo:netconcepts_anguilla
US Fax and Voicemail: (605)253-1759
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jonathan M. Slivko
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hard drive boot problem
> Just took delivery of a rack mount server with an Adaptec 1200A RAID
> controller and two 80GB IDE drives.
>
> The RAID conntroller does not work with Linux, so I am ditching it. However,
> when I install on the Hard drives connected to the motherboard, they will
> not boot after the install.
Just took delivery of a rack mount server with an Adaptec 1200A RAID
controller and two 80GB IDE drives.
The RAID conntroller does not work with Linux, so I am ditching it. However,
when I install on the Hard drives connected to the motherboard, they will
not boot after the install. The BIOS sees
Try booting in single mode. Then when it says / is already mounted, you
can cat the mtab file and see what is in /etc/fstab and in /proc (as well
as your logs)
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Brandon Dorman wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Some of you may remember my grub and windows problem of a bit ago.
I made a rescue disk but got the same errors. I will download tom's rtbt
disk. Thanks.
-Brandon
At 06:16 AM 1/14/02 -0500, you wrote:
>Well, I'm not sure what the problem is, but did you make a boot/rescue
>disk when you installed? If not, you could download Tom's Root Boot
>disk instead.
Well, I'm not sure what the problem is, but did you make a boot/rescue
disk when you installed? If not, you could download Tom's Root Boot
disk instead. Then perhaps you could boot from the floppy and learn
something.
BTW, you can find Tom's Root Boot disk at
http://www.toms.net/rb
Regards,
B
Hey guys,
Some of you may remember my grub and windows problem of a bit ago. Well
following that I reinstalled yesterday, and everything worked fine for 24
hours until i went in windows to do some final cleanup... so I thought.
Upon reboot, I was greeted by hell. After it initialize
Mikkel,
Well I did run the command, and it gave me a prompt and it said nothing else.
So do you think it might be a BIOS issue then? Have you heard of any issues
with the Intel 440GX+ MB? I have not check out Intels page yet for an updated
one. Sounds like it might be something that is nee
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Steven Pierce wrote:
>
>
> I did get the floppy to boot as it should. It just would not run the
> resume on the box. When it did run I got to the point that it said LI
> and stopped. It took a hard reset to get it to run again?
>
> Steven
>
Steven,
Let me see i
I did get the floppy to boot as it should. It just would not run the resume on
the box. When it did run I got to the point that it said LI and stopped.
It took a hard reset to get it to run again?
Steven
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/13/2001 at 13:05 Mikkel L. Ellertson wr
Mikkel,
Thank you. One thing that I did find was that I was able to boot from the floppy and
get into the machine as Root. All my files are there and things that I had left on
the desktop is still in the place that it was left. I did still need to boot off the
floppy to get in. So I am not
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Steven Pierce wrote:
>
>
> I have tried to boot with the recovery floppy and it is giving me a
> lot of information:
>
> First it is telling me that Insert ROOT floppy disk that is to be
> loaded into RAM.
>
> Loading 1440 blocks [1 disk] into ram disk .. DONE
> VFS Mo
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Steven Pierce wrote:
>
>
> Mikkel,
>
> Well I am running, it took booting off a floppy to get up and going.
> Now I need to figure out why it did this. I read that it could be
> files that are corrupt in /sbin/init. How can I tell if this is the
> case or not? Also wh
Mikkel,
Well I am running, it took booting off a floppy to get up and going. Now I need to
figure out why
it did this. I read that it could be files that are corrupt in /sbin/init. How can I
tell if this is
the case or not? Also what would I use to replace them?
Thank you for the help.
I have tried to boot with the recovery floppy and it is giving me a lot of information:
First it is telling me that Insert ROOT floppy disk that is to be loaded into RAM.
Loading 1440 blocks [1 disk] into ram disk .. DONE
VFS Mounted Root (ext2 filesystem) readonly
change_root: old root h
Mikkel,
I am doing a update on the machine. So we will see. It is going to take about
40 minutes or more. I am adding some new packages also. Since it needs to
install. It is midnight my time, so I am off to bed. I will be on first thing in the
AM.
Thank you for the help.
Steven
***
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Steven Pierce wrote:
>
> Mikkel,
>
> When you say make a boot disk, during the install when I first did it?
> I am not sure if I did that or not, but I think I still have the boot disk that
> came with it when I purchased it. Will that do?
> S
>
That should work picking t
Mikkel,
When you say make a boot disk, during the install when I first did it?
I am not sure if I did that or not, but I think I still have the boot disk that
came with it when I purchased it. Will that do?
S
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/13/2001 at 01:06 Mikkel L. Ellertson w
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Steven Pierce wrote:
>
> OK.. Let me try this again. The last time I did this I was told by
> the list that I could not send a message like this because it was
> admin related. Why is behond me..
>
>
>
> Good Evening All,
>
> I have a RH 6.1 server. It has been off fo
OK.. Let me try this again. The last time I did this I was told by the list that I
could not send a message like this because it was admin related. Why is behond
me..
Good Evening All,
I have a RH 6.1 server. It has been off for about 2 weeks now. I am trying to reboot
it, but
when I do
Well the second hard drive has been installed and guess what
... all the data is really there. What has happenned? We do not
know. Why could not the system see the data?
Anyhow, this is just another lesson about the need of reliable
backups...
Thanks,
Dominic.
Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PRO
John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm...I'd see what you can recover by installing a new hard drive
> with RedHat 6.x pre-installed. With any luck, you'll see what
> SHOULD be there... Not sure what exactly would have caused
> this
> John
My honest guess is that the data is
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback,
>
> Nothing is working like we would like... (See below the message
> the boot process is sending to the screen). Basically, it does
> not start most of the services and dumps a bash prompt without
> even asking for a pas
Thanks for the feedback,
Nothing is working like we would like... (See below the message
the boot process is sending to the screen). Basically, it does
not start most of the services and dumps a bash prompt without
even asking for a password!
We have ran fsck on the devices without much ex
Jamin W. Collins
-Original Message-
From: Dominic Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 12:13 PM
To: Redhat
Cc: Letendre Marc-Andre
Subject: boot problem
I am posting this message for a friend of mine.
He bought a dell computer about a year ago with RH6
There wouldn't happen to be a line that looks like this in his /etc/lilo.conf
append ="init=/bin/bash"
Have your friend try this:
boot his box
when it gets to lilo: prompt, typ this
linux 3
And see if that helps.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 01:13:05PM -0400, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
>
> I am pos
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> I am posting this message for a friend of mine.
>
> He bought a dell computer about a year ago with RH6.x already
> installed on it. So far he had no major problem with it.
>
> This week while pasting from Netscape to Wordperfect8 it seemed
> th
I am posting this message for a friend of mine.
He bought a dell computer about a year ago with RH6.x already
installed on it. So far he had no major problem with it.
This week while pasting from Netscape to Wordperfect8 it seemed
that all cpu cycles where being eaten. From what I remember
At 18:12 11/08/00 +0200, Arturs Korneevs wrote:
>I installed RH6.2. I created RAID1 on /boot (md0).
>Qwestion: Is it posiible recompile kernel ?
If your system boots from your current kernel in /boot, and you will be
placing your new kernel in /boot, then yes, it is possible to recompile the
ker
** Reply Requested by 8/13/2000 (Sunday) **
Hello,
I installed RH6.2. I created RAID1 on /boot (md0).
Qwestion: Is it posiible recompile kernel ?
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Installed new kernel 2.2.16 from rpm. Have a little problem. It wont load
the initscripts. It goes to freeing unused kernel memory and stops. I got
an error message on one boot attempt. Booting back to 2.2.14, everything
is fine.
init: error in loading shared libraries: /lib/libc.so.6: unsupporte
I don't know if this is LILO-related, mbr related, or
unrelated to Linux, but I've never seen it before:
Machine is Pentium 166, all SCSI, Adaptec 2940 controller.
MB and BIOS are AMD. System is about 3 ~ 4 years old.
I've had several versions of Linux on it, including the
latest, on the secon
Did you have a look at where your linux boot partition is located? If it
ends above the 1023 cylinder, it will not boot. Partition Magic will show
you this information. If you're boot partition ends above 1023, you'll
have to move it.
John
At 05:24 AM 2/25/00 -0500, Sajjad Khaliq wrote:
>I
I installed Red Hat 6.1 as a dual boot with NT 4.0 and Powerquest
Boot Magic as the boot manager, but Linux will not boot.
The installation is thus:
1) NT 4.0 on a FAT 16 partition was installed first
2) Powerquest Bootmagic was installed second
3) Then Linux Red Hat 6.1 was installed on an EXT2
All,
I recently installed RedHat 5.0 on a 386 with 1.2G hard drive. I have
dedicated the whole drive to Redhat.
When I boot, all I get is LI then the system stops.
I am able to get the system to boot with the boot disk that came with the
installation by typing: linux single root=/dev/roo
> I suppose I don't understand what is going on here when we are talking
> about the 1023 cylinder limit...Is there something you do during the
> installation to force the root to be placed before the 1023 limit?
> Maybe someone could help me gain some understanding on this one
Sorry, I probably didn't phrase my question properly
I suppose I don't understand what is going on here when we are talking
about the 1023 cylinder limit...Is there something you do during the
installation to force the root to be placed before the 1023 limit?
73 matches
Mail list logo
