Gustav Schaffter wrote:
> I have later learnt that it might be smarter to REJECT calls to auth
> than DENY'ing them. Should reduce number of retries and thereby shorten
> any timeouts.
Not really. As I was beginning to see earlier, when I wrote to the list
regarding firewalls, REJECT is identica
Charles Galpin wrote:
> 1. Like Gustav, I would like to know which is better
I don't know. I don't get a high enough volume of auth requests on my
mail servers to really care whether it's standalone or inetd.
> 2. I did not have identd selected in ntsysv, and am quite sure I didn't
> start it m
> > > 2. I did not have identd selected in ntsysv, and am quite sure I didn't
> > > start it mayself. So how did it get started? I'm thinking linuxconf is
> > > trying to do it. If this is true, then maybe the simplest route is to run
> > > it standalo
sure I didn't
> > start it mayself. So how did it get started? I'm thinking linuxconf is
> > trying to do it. If this is true, then maybe the simplest route is to run
> > it standalone and remove from inetd.conf. Anyone?
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Gordon Messm
rying to do it. If this is true, then maybe the simplest route is to run
> it standalone and remove from inetd.conf. Anyone?
>
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> > Charles Galpin wrote:
> > > Mar 13 22:49:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address alre
m thinking linuxconf is
trying to do it. If this is true, then maybe the simplest route is to run
it standalone and remove from inetd.conf. Anyone?
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Charles Galpin wrote:
> > Mar 13 22:49:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already
wrote:
> > Mar 13 22:49:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in
> > use
> > Mar 13 22:59:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in
> > use
> >
> > I have named setup to run at boot time in ntsysv.
>
> hehehe... The "
Charles Galpin wrote:
> Mar 13 22:49:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in
> use
> Mar 13 22:59:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in
> use
>
> I have named setup to run at boot time in ntsysv.
hehehe... The "bind" in th
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 11:04:13PM -0500, Charles Galpin wrote:
> I know I've seen this one before, but can't find it in the archives
>
> I get these every ten minutes in the logs:
>
> Mar 13 22:49:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in
> use
&g
I know I've seen this one before, but can't find it in the archives
I get these every ten minutes in the logs:
Mar 13 22:49:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in
use
Mar 13 22:59:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in
use
I have named setup
Hi,
I have upgraded to the latest lpd from priority.redhat.com and I
still unable to print from anywhere.
Telnetting to localhost 515 gives me "connection refused" and logs the
subject of this message to /var/log/messages.
Before the upgrade I was getting "malformed from address".
I can
This problem can also be because you have installed both gated and routed
they are both programs that handles routing, but gated are mostly used in
very big networks, so I would suggest that you remove the gated daemon.
yours,
Peter Chr. Hansen
At 22:49 13-03-98 -0500, you wrote:
>This is the sa
This is the same one I get if I leave the system on overnight
I just have not done any more researchI suspect in my case it is because I
entered the DNS info during install, but did not build the bind databases yet.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVE
e>
>Applixware directory structure for ".lock" files or something like that.
>
>
> Joe Nestlerode wrote:
> > After a rude reboot (power failure), I now get this when I try to start
> > Applixware:
> >
> > kilgore ~>> applix &
> >
> kilgore ~>> applix &
> [1] 212
> kilgore ~>> bind: Address already in use
> bind: Address already in use
> connect: /usr/local/applix/axdata/axnet: Address already in use
> [1]+ Exit 98 applix
> kilgore ~>>
After a rude reboot (power failure), I now get this when I try to start
Applixware:
kilgore ~>> applix &
[1] 212
kilgore ~>> bind: Address already in use
bind: Address already in use
connect: /usr/local/applix/axdata/axnet: Address already in use
[1]+ Exit 98
16 matches
Mail list logo
