I recently tried to upgrade an old laptop from RH 8 to RH 9. The copy of RH
8 I have is the "publisher's edition" from Red Hat 8 for Dummies, and the
copy of RH 9 I have I downloaded from linuxiso.org and burned to CD. When I
did the upgrade, I lost PCMCIA support for some reason. I use the PCMC
On 16 Jun 2003 at 15:47, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 07:02, Scarletdown wrote:
> >
> > Here's links to a couple pictures of the screen,
> > showing what I mean here...
>
>
>
? That just a synonym for ? :p
> KDE is graphics intensive; eye-candy intensive. Even on hig
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 07:02, Scarletdown wrote:
> I managed to get XF86 configured and have KDE as my
> default window manager. For the most part, it works
> beautifully. However, there is a bit of weirdness if
> I log out of KDE and then go back in with startx.
> When I
I managed to get XF86 configured and have KDE as my
default window manager. For the most part, it works
beautifully. However, there is a bit of weirdness if
I log out of KDE and then go back in with startx.
When I go back in, the display gets really screwed up.
Here's links to a c
My first attempt to post this seems to have just vanished without a trace, so here
goes again...
I managed to get XF86 configured and have KDE as my
default window manager. For the most part, it works
beautifully. However, there is a bit of weirdness if
I log out of KDE and then go back in
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Michael Fratoni wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 25 December 2002 04:14 pm, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > ok, there's definitely something weird in the latest kernel --
> > 2.4.20-2.2 -- that affects (although not in a fatal way) which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 25 December 2002 04:14 pm, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> ok, there's definitely something weird in the latest kernel --
> 2.4.20-2.2 -- that affects (although not in a fatal way) which
> config file will be used as a default if there is no c
ok, there's definitely something weird in the latest kernel --
2.4.20-2.2 -- that affects (although not in a fatal way) which
config file will be used as a default if there is no current
config file. (i've verified that the same problem exists
in earlier kernel source trees.)
in my brand new
TED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 3:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Weirdness...
>
>
> Ok, so I want to shut down the Redhat Security in 8.0, the
> firewall that is. And I tried doing iptables off and that
&g
> Ok, so I want to shut down the Redhat Security in
> 8.0, the firewall that is. And I tried doing iptables off and that seemed to
> help something, but it didn't do what I was hoping. See, I'm trying to install
> Samba, and in order to configure it it tries to connect to localhost:901.
You can
, December 16, 2002 3:41
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Weirdness...
Ok, so I want to shut down the Redhat Security in
8.0, the firewall that is. And I tried doing iptables off and that seemed to
help something, but it didn't do what I was hoping. See, I'm trying to install
Sam
Ok, so I want to shut down the Redhat Security in
8.0, the firewall that is. And I tried doing iptables off and that seemed to
help something, but it didn't do what I was hoping. See, I'm trying to install
Samba, and in order to configure it it tries to connect to localhost:901. And
with the
I am having trouble getting my X-Windows up and running.
Machine: RedHat 7.3
A bit of history; it used to work. My machine crashed (Lightning Hit on
Phone line) and it was rebooted, all seems ok, except for two things.
X-Windows does not start up on my remote workstation. (I use Exceed on a
PC
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Tom Pollerman wrote:
>See 'man hwclock.'
> " hwclock --systohc
> Set the Hardware Clock to the current System Time."
>
>If your hardware clock was correct, and your system clock was 4
> hours off, your hardware clock is now also 4 hours off.
>
> From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> i am getting increasingly baffled with what my HW clock and system
> clock are doing on my dell inspiron.
>
> i started with both clocks set to 11 am wednesday and, on my dell,
> i can pop into the bios whenever i want to see the HW c
i am getting increasingly baffled with what my HW clock and system
clock are doing on my dell inspiron.
i started with both clocks set to 11 am wednesday and, on my dell,
i can pop into the bios whenever i want to see the HW clock. it
agreed with both "date" and "hwclock --show". and
/etc
I think you'll find that CPAN and rpm don't mix too well. You should
either remover the rpm, and use the version of perl that CPAN installed
in /usr/local, or remover the CPAN version and get an rpm of the Tk
module (have a look on rpmfind.net for perl-Tk).
I find using rpms easier to maintain,
Hi,
I have a dual P100 system (ALR Revolution Q-4SMP) which runs RH 7.2
flawlessly, though the SMP-HOWTO gives a vague indication that these older
ALR SMP systems are "iffy". This machine has 10 EISA slots (3 are also
VLB), so I cannot install anything PCI in it of course.
I installed an ISA NE
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 07:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As of a few days ago, a completely up2date'd Rh7.2 system.
>
> Up until a week ago, I haven't touched the perl installation of this distro.
>
> A week ago, when a user tried to run a perl program, the program reported it
> couldn't find Tk.
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As of a few days ago, a completely up2date'd Rh7.2 system.
Up until a week ago, I haven't touched the perl installation of this distro.
A week ago, when a user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dave brett wrote:
>I give up we have different views on how DNS should work.
>
>Thanks for your insight.
And thank you for the lively discussion.
- -d
- --
David Talkington
PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp
- --
http://se
I give up we have different views on how DNS should work.
Thanks for your insight.
david
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, David Talkington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> dave brett wrote:
>
> >> >Using the root servers defeats the purpose of the design of the whole
> >> >stru
> Well, that just shows once again that all the good names have already been
> picked...IBM.com, Microsoft.com, Dekkers.com...
>
> Gerry
LOL - and that's all I'll say about that. Looks like I've already started a
DNS debate.
Regards and thanks again.
Edward.
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Talkington wrote:
>Remember that the roots _only_ answer queries for top-level
>namespaces. They are not recursive. That means (following my previous
>example) that even if every one of my workstations hits a redhat.com
>site every two minutes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dave brett wrote:
>> >Using the root servers defeats the purpose of the design of the whole
>> >structure.
>>
>> I'll respectfully suggest that I'm not able to find any evidence in
>> the RFC to support that conclusion. Read on ...
>
>I would not
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, David Talkington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Ok, so you _do_ want to open this discussion. I'll do my best, with
> the caveat that this is pre-espresso.
>
I don't want to get into a long debate. I was just pointing out the
design con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, so you _do_ want to open this discussion. I'll do my best, with
the caveat that this is pre-espresso.
>Using the root servers defeats the purpose of the design of the whole
>structure.
I'll respectfully suggest that I'm not able to find any
Hi David
Using the root servers defeats the purpose of the design of the whole
structure. What I do if I don't like the ISP's DNS servers is use a
different one, but not the root. The easiest way to look at it is, if
everybody did it, what would the effect be?
david
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dave brett wrote:
>You should not be using the root servers. Instead use the DNS servers of
>your ISP.
That isn't necessarily true, and is a long and sordid debate that I
don't think you really want to open. ;-) The choice of DNS resolvers
boil
You should not be using the root servers. Instead use the DNS servers of
your ISP.
david
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, David Talkington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> >On 09:16 06 Feb 2002, Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >| > dom
Well, that just shows once again that all the good names have already been
picked...IBM.com, Microsoft.com, Dekkers.com...
Gerry
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> After a bit of investigation, it seems someone had indeed registered
> dekkers.com way back in 1997.
>
> The record was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Talkington wrote:
>>Either register the domain or use a nonexistent top level domain like .home.
>
>Or use a split-horizon DNS resolver on your private network - one
>that's a) only visible to your machines, and b) obeys your authority
>for de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cameron Simpson wrote:
>On 09:16 06 Feb 2002, Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>| > domain.com belongs to a bank in Bethlehem, PA.
>|
>| the real names I use in here are based on the domain dekkers.com.
>|
>| which is what worries me. The
> > How do I stop that?
>
> Tell it to stop. :)
>
> [root@tuxfan etc]# head -10 /etc/named.conf
> acl "localnet" { 192.168.0/24; 127.0.0.1/32; };
> options {
> directory "/var/named";
> allow-query { "localnet"; };
> listen-on{ 192.168.0.3; 127.0.0.1; };
> auth-nxdo
On 09:16 06 Feb 2002, Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > domain.com belongs to a bank in Bethlehem, PA.
|
| the real names I use in here are based on the domain dekkers.com.
|
| which is what worries me. They SHOULD NOT RESOLVE externally. I was hoping
| they would not. But, as you h
After a bit of investigation, it seems someone had indeed registered
dekkers.com way back in 1997.
The record was updated 28/12/2001, so I assume they've only just started
using it and we just hadn't noticed up until now. (Although a few 'niggly'
things now start to make sense)
The guy who regis
> "ed" == Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> domain.com belongs to a bank in Bethlehem, PA.
>>
ed> sorry, domain.com was just the example I used Gerry.
ed> your first answer is the correct one.
ed> the real names I use in here are based on the domain dekker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 05 February 2002 08:16 pm, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> the real names I use in here are based on the domain dekkers.com.
>
> which is what worries me. They SHOULD NOT RESOLVE externally. I was
> hoping they would not. But, as you have found ou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 05 February 2002 08:09 pm, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> Just noticed in my logs that when named starts up this is what happens:
[snip]
> (eth0) Feb 6 08:17:19 server named[8251]: listening on
> [203.59.196.224].53 (ppp0) Feb 6 08:17:19 server
Just noticed in my logs that when named starts up this is what happens:
Feb 6 08:17:19 server named[8251]: hint zone "" (IN) loaded (serial 0)
Feb 6 08:17:19 server named[8251]: Zone "0.0.127.in-addr.arpa" (file
named.local): No default TTL ($TTL ) set, using SOA minimum instead
Feb 6 08:17:19
> domain.com belongs to a bank in Bethlehem, PA.
>
sorry, domain.com was just the example I used Gerry.
your first answer is the correct one.
the real names I use in here are based on the domain dekkers.com.
which is what worries me. They SHOULD NOT RESOLVE externally. I was hoping
they woul
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> What the???
>
> I have set up an internal domain 'domain.com'
>
domain.com belongs to a bank in Bethlehem, PA.
Gerry
--
"The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne" Chaucer
___
Redhat-list mai
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Edward Dekkers wrote:
>
> kylie or kylie.domain.com (216.147.69.55 <--- Where did THIS come from). It
> says it is pinging from 203.59.196.224. OK, I thought maybe stuffed up my
> DHCP somehow, but it gets worse. PING responds EVEN with the PC turned OFF.
> How does that work
TED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Edward Dekkers
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DNS weirdness
What the???
I have set up an internal domain 'domain.com'
On this domain I have 5 PCs
1> Linux 6.2 (server.domain.com)(192.168.
What the???
I have set up an internal domain 'domain.com'
On this domain I have 5 PCs
1> Linux 6.2 (server.domain.com)(192.168.0.10)
2> My own PC (edward.domain.com)(192.168.0.2)
3> My wife's PC (kylie.domain.com)(DHCP - only just starting to test
it - can drop it back to 192.16
> Hello Edward,
>
> How is the space looking on your log volume ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pieter
Hello there Pieter!
/dev/hda72566671542258919063%/var
Should be enough right?
--
Edward Dekkers (Director)
Triple D Computer Services Pty. Ltd.
822 Rowley Road
Oakford W.A. 6121
+61
Hello Edward,
How is the space looking on your log volume ?
Cheers,
Pieter
-Original Message-
From: Edward Dekkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 December 2001 10:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: smb.log weirdness
Sometimes I get dumped to the console words to the effect of
Sometimes I get dumped to the console words to the effect of 'open log
/var/log/samba/log.smb' failed using console.
Then all the stuff which would normally go to the log is dumped to the
console.
I've checked the permissions and they are the same as log.nmb (0777).
Funny thing is, is that ther
When I boot to run level 3, I can log in as user or root with no problem
However, if I boot to run level 5 here is what happens.
I try to login as user immediately and gnome appears to like what I told it
in way of my name and password. It tries to start, exits and ask me to log
in again. Th
I have two systems that have been upgraded to RHL 7.0. One from 6.1, the
other from 6.2.
One one system, sort will sort lines in a file as I would expect from the
past: capital letters preceed all lower-case letters. However, on the other
one, it treats all letters as lower-case, as though the
I have two systems that have been upgraded to RHL 7.0. One from 6.1, the
other from 6.2.
One one system, sort will sort lines in a file as I would expect from the
past: capital letters preceed all lower-case letters. However, on the other
one, it treats all letters as lower-case, as though the
> Isn't there a performance gain achieved by shadwoing the rom? I have
> been doing this for so long I forget whay I started it in the beginning
> of my pc years on my first xt clone.
>From my latest findings - System ROM shadowing can increase performance.
Video ROM shadowing doesn't seem to ma
> Isn't there a performance gain achieved by shadwoing the rom? I have
> been doing this for so long I forget whay I started it in the beginning
> of my pc years on my first xt clone.
Well, from what I've been told, shadowing is the only way protected mode
environments like Linux on the x86 can
Edward Dekkers wrote:
>
> > You forgot the memory taken up by the kernel. This does not show up in
> > with the free command. I have seen bigger discrepencys when you have
> > onboard video - some systems use part of the main memory for video
> > memory, and you select how much video ram in you
Howdy,
I was just trying to figure out how much RAM one of our servers has and I keep getting
weird answers. I thought it had either 256 or 512, really, I thought 256. But look at
the following:
[admin@csc003 admin]$ free -m
total used free sharedbuffers ca
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I was just trying to figure out how much RAM one of our servers has and I keep
>getting weird answers. I thought it had either 256 or 512, really, I thought 256. But
>look at the following:
>
> [admin@csc003 admin]$ free -m
>
> You forgot the memory taken up by the kernel. This does not show up in
> with the free command. I have seen bigger discrepencys when you have
> onboard video - some systems use part of the main memory for video
> memory, and you select how much video ram in your BIOS.
>
> Mikkel
Right on Mikk
Hello,
I'm using apache (apache-1.3.14-2.6.2) with named based virtual hosts. I
have configured this:
---
Listen xxx.xx.xx.xx:80 <-- with a real IP number
NameVirtualHost xxx.xx.xx.xx
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DocumentRoot /my_directory/htdocs
ServerName www.my_serv
On Behalf Of Chad W. Skinner
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 2056
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Ethernet weirdness
>
>
> Does anyone know if this situation would occur if the card was set to
> auto-negotiate. It may not be able to start do to settings.
>
>
Does anyone know if this situation would occur if the card was set to
auto-negotiate. It may not be able to start do to settings.
I am reaching here as I am not very familiar with hardware.
Chad
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https:/
My bet is on the cards. I've seen this happen with a friend's setup like
this -
win98 -- crossover cable-- linux
The win98 box wouldn't boot without the linux box being up. I don't recall
about visa versa.
they were dead cheap nics, but don't recall the brand.
charles
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Mic
usually the SIO errors happen when you try to do address/other config
stuff on an improperly initialized piece of hardware or if the actions
trying to be performed are illegal (including not possible)... could be a
bad NIC (mind you I didn't read the whole original post) or just a bad config
file
> Funky NIC? I would swap the cards to try and isolate the problem. If the
Aaargh. Now that you mention that, I bet you're right. I'll try that
at some point... being a hardware clutz I'm not up to it right now...
I just thought of a couple other things to try...
1. putting a hub between th
Micah Yoder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two RH6.2 boxes connected to each other by Ethernet, a crossover
> cable. Both have 3Com 905 cards.
>
> The names are eclipse and nova. The weird thing is that nova MUST come
> up first, or they won't talk to each other.
>
> If I boot eclipse when nova is not
Hi,
I have two RH6.2 boxes connected to each other by Ethernet, a crossover
cable. Both have 3Com 905 cards.
The names are eclipse and nova. The weird thing is that nova MUST come
up first, or they won't talk to each other.
If I boot eclipse when nova is not on, eth0 is not activated. If I
l
On 28-Oct-2000 guanchen KHOO opined:
> I have RedHat-5.2 and upgraded rpm to rpm-3.0.5-7.5x which I think I
> got
> from rpm.org - cannot be sure though. Had a scary problem yesterday
> when I
> tried to --rebuild bison-1.27-3.src.rpm. The rebuild always fails,
> complaining that it cannot find s
I have RedHat-5.2 and upgraded rpm to rpm-3.0.5-7.5x which I think I got
from rpm.org - cannot be sure though. Had a scary problem yesterday when I
tried to --rebuild bison-1.27-3.src.rpm. The rebuild always fails,
complaining that it cannot find some files (I think the info files) in the
build ro
On 25-Sep-2000 Jack Bowling spoke something to the effect:
> Here is a weird one, folks. Trying to do the xconfig for the 2.2.17
> kernel but
> it refuses to give me a selection for compiling ppp. In fact, the whole
> ppp,
> slip, etc. section seems to be missing from the scripts. Pretty tough
>
Here is a weird one, folks. Trying to do the xconfig for the 2.2.17 kernel but
it refuses to give me a selection for compiling ppp. In fact, the whole ppp,
slip, etc. section seems to be missing from the scripts. Pretty tough getting
ppp stuff to work without it compiled. Has anyone run into this
In xterm both Backspace and Delete keys show ~ and the bell sounds.
In Xemacs the Delete key acts like the Backspace key. In the xterm
showkey shows Backspace as 14 and the Delete key as 111.
I'm at a loss as to what the problem is.
TIA
Bob
--
+--
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Bob Taylor wrote:
> In xterm both Backspace and Delete keys show ~ and the bell sounds.
> In Xemacs the Delete key acts like the Backspace key. In the xterm
> showkey shows Backspace as 14 and the Delete key as 111.
>
> I'm at a loss as to what the problem is.
>
Check to
In xterm both Backspace and Delete keys show ~ and the bell sounds.
In Xemacs the Delete key acts like the Backspace key. In the xterm
showkey shows Backspace as 14 and the Delete key as 111.
I'm at a loss as to what the problem is.
TIA
Bob
--
+--
ning
a gnome session with one of the window managers I mentioned, but no
other user processes running besides a Gnome Terminal and GMC.
Again, this was never a problem in 6.1.
# Problem 3 --general weirdness
Sometimes when this is occuring, when I issue a "reboot -n" the system
will sta
half Of Larry Mintz
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 7:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: MySQL weirdness
>
>
> I am having trouble establising user prividges.
> I followed the info from devshed.com
> I typed in
> user(host,name,password)
> values('local
On Mon, 8 May 2000, Mark Basil wrote:
> Try
>
> insert into user values ("localhost","username",password("$userpassword"));
The kosher way is:
grant select, insert, delete, update on database.table to user@domain
identified by 'password';
this will give user access to database.table when he c
Also, try going here:
http://mysql.com/Manual/manual_toc.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Larry Mintz
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 7:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MySQL weirdness
I am having trouble establising user
Monday, May 08, 2000 7:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MySQL weirdness
I am having trouble establising user prividges.
I followed the info from devshed.com
I typed in
user(host,name,password)
values('localhost','goofy',password('disney'));
and MySQL reported
I am having trouble establising user prividges.
I followed the info from devshed.com
I typed in
user(host,name,password)
values('localhost','goofy',password('disney'));
and MySQL reported back
Syntax error in Line 2
What can I do to fix this problem ?
Larry<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
---
On Mon, 8 May 2000, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> > It can switch 4 times and RH is set to #1 Windows #2 nothing on 3 and 4
>
> OK, I've come across this before.
>
> You need to move the cables around. I'm e-mailing a customer who had this
> problem as of this moment who know exactly the combination
> It can switch 4 times and RH is set to #1 Windows #2 nothing on 3 and 4
OK, I've come across this before.
You need to move the cables around. I'm e-mailing a customer who had this
problem as of this moment who know exactly the combination required. I think
it was 1 and 3 you need to use, not o
On Mon, 8 May 2000, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> > totally. I have to restart XWindows to make it work again.
> >
> > Has anyone else experienced this?
>
> Yes, am I correct in assuming this is a PS/2 mouse?
>
Yes it is
> How many ways can the box switch - just the two?
>
It can switch 4 t
> totally. I have to restart XWindows to make it work again.
>
> Has anyone else experienced this?
Yes, am I correct in assuming this is a PS/2 mouse?
How many ways can the box switch - just the two?
I'll let you know why I'm asking when you answer those questions.
--
Edward Dekkers (Direc
Hi
Not quite the same I have color problems with my switch and I'm lead to
believe
it is part of the deal with switchs and that some of the more costly
box's don't
play up as much but I'm not gong to there, I'll try get another monitor I
think
On Sun, 7 May 2000 17:26:16 -0500 (CDT), Scarlett sa
I have a strange problem with imwheel. I have a switcher box I use
between RH6.2 and Windows 98. When I switch from RH to Windows everything
works fine but when I go back to RH my scroll button stops working
totally. I have to restart XWindows to make it work again.
Has anyone else experien
Hi Larry,
Well, everything I am going to tell you is assuming you have just done a
stock install of some recent RedHat, or have used all RPMs to install.
First type this at the prompt...
/etc/rc.d/init.d/postgresql status
You should get a response similar to this...(pid could be different)
postm
I can't connect to postgresql
Connect to database 'user' failed:Connection refused
connectDB()--connect() failed Connection refused
Is the postmaster running at 'localhost' and accepting connections
at UNIX socket 5432 ?
How do I fix this ?
I started reading the html docs and it didn't
On Sat, 6 May 2000, Larry Mintz wrote:
> Just curious ,Slashdot.org there was an article critiquing
> Mysql. The author stated that MySQL is not a real RDBMS.
> He stated that MySQL not good as an enterprise db ?
> What do you think ?
> larrym
MySQL is a fast, lightweight SQL engine. Great for
On 07-May-00 Danny wrote:
> mysql username are a "seperate" entity with the /etc/passwd file
> The mysql password is stored in a db called "mysql" and the root,
> yourusername
> is stored in "/etc/passwd"
>
> So it doesn't really matter if you use "root" or "username"
> Looking forward to your
mysql username are a "seperate" entity with the /etc/passwd file
The mysql password is stored in a db called "mysql" and the root, yourusername
is stored in "/etc/passwd"
So it doesn't really matter if you use "root" or "username"
Looking forward to your feedback.
dannyh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
I can't connect to mysql through xmysqladmin-1.0 as user, but I can as root.
How can I fix this problem ?
But I can connect directly to mysql in textmode when I work as a user.
What gives ?
Larry<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
--
E-Mail: Larry Mintz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be
an X/gnome one though using the command line player (mpeg?) that came with
RH6 in xterm give me the same problem. NH.
--
>From: shock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: redhad-list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: MP3 Weirdness
>Date: Mon, Mar 27, 2000, 3:41 am
>
>I
I started playing with some MP3 applications today, and something really
weird is going on. When I play an MP3, there's no sound and it plays it
/very/ slowly. For example, it takes about 45 seconds to process
through the first 6 seconds of the song.
I've compiled and installed xmms and alsapla
At 05:09 PM 03/22/2000 +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote:
>All right... thanks to the Squid users' list and Duane Wessels, the problem
>is solved. No idea why, but I had:
>
>nameserver localhost
>
>in /etc/resolv.conf. Only IP addresses are allowed in there, so Squid borked
>on it its own inimicabl
ases and things, perhaps using CGI's or even SSL's, but Squid won't
let'em past (which is a real bummer of a way to end your on-line shopping
spree ;-)
Alan
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Juha Saarinen wrote regarding Squid weirdness:
> Trying to figure out why Web browsing was slo
All right... thanks to the Squid users' list and Duane Wessels, the problem
is solved. No idea why, but I had:
nameserver localhost
in /etc/resolv.conf. Only IP addresses are allowed in there, so Squid borked
on it its own inimicable fashion.
-- Juha
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PR
%-> I've never seen it before but it looks like maybe squid is
%-> trying to send a
%-> dns query to a broadcast address. Doesn't make any sense to me
%-> either. Do
%-> you have ipfwadm/ipchains rules on the same server or a
%-> different one that
%-> would be denying what squid is trying to do
Juha Saarinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Trying to figure out why Web browsing was slower going through Squid rather
>than directly to the 'Net, I looked in cache.log and found lots of these
>messages:
>
>2000/03/21 22:54:48| comm_udp_sendto: FD 1, 255.255.255.255, port 53: (13)
>Permission deni
Trying to figure out why Web browsing was slower going through Squid rather
than directly to the 'Net, I looked in cache.log and found lots of these
messages:
2000/03/21 22:54:48| comm_udp_sendto: FD 1, 255.255.255.255, port 53: (13)
Permission denied
2000/03/21 22:54:48| idnsSendQuery: FD 1: sen
man 7 signal on my system shows:
Signal Value Action Comment
SIGEMT 7,-,7 G
action G refers to:
G Not a POSIX.1 conformant signal.
now, a bit of brief digging has unearthed the following hypothesis:
it occurs when you can't get a free page in memory
I found the
Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>man 7 signal lists most signals -- but no info on 7 for some reason
>(at least on my 6.1 version).
My 6.0 says, not in the POSIX list but under "various other signals":
Signal Value Action Comment
-
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
