On Dec 3, 2001, 16:53 (+0800) Edward Dekkers wrote:
> > I need to manage automatics time syncing (GMT +1). I think about 1 hour
> > checking for correct time in CRONTAB.
> > HOW TO DO IT???
>
> man ntpdate
> man hwclock
... especially hwclock ... the very latest versi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Linux wrote:
>Try this in you CRON tab file
>
>30 */6 * * * root /usr/sbin/ntpdate -u time-a.nist.gov
>updates every 6 hours and even reports to /var/spool/mail/root
>it works fo me!
That server is one of the top NTP servers in th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, ethan wrote:
>Tried that and got:
>[root@Echelon dev]# ntpdate -u time-a.nist.gov
> 4 Dec 17:36:42 ntpdate[1976]: no server suitable for synchronization found
>
>Is it my firewall ?
Most likely, yes.
Tony
- --
Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony E. Greene wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Petr Jerabek wrote:
>>I need to manage automatics time syncing (GMT +1). I think about 1 hour
>>checking for correct time in CRONTAB.
>>HOW TO DO IT???
>
>NTP is the best, ru
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 07:55:17AM -0800, Jack Bowling wrote:
> ** Reply to message from ethan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 03 Dec 2001 19:15:10
>+0800
> > oh sorry: checked in var/log/messages and got the same thing:
> >
> > Dec 3 19:13:11 Echelon ntpdate[1939]: no server suitable for
> > syn
aybe the
wakeup call I just sent over to the webmaster will help them fix it.
> >L> Mike
> >
> >L> -Original Message-
> >L> From: Edward Dekkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >L> Sent: Monday, 3 December 2001 21:54
> >L> To: [EMAIL PROTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Petr Jerabek wrote:
>I need to manage automatics time syncing (GMT +1). I think about 1 hour
>checking for correct time in CRONTAB.
>HOW TO DO IT???
NTP is the best, run as a daemon. Look for the ntp RPM. You can also ru
** Reply to message from Jasper Jans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 03 Dec 2001 13:46:17
+0100 (MET)
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, ethan managed to produce:
>
> | oh sorry: checked in var/log/messages and got the same thing:
> |
> | Dec 3 19:13:11 Echelon ntpdate[1939]: no server suitable for
> | synchr
** Reply to message from ethan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 03 Dec 2001 19:15:10
+0800
> oh sorry: checked in var/log/messages and got the same thing:
>
> Dec 3 19:13:11 Echelon ntpdate[1939]: no server suitable for
> synchronization found
>
> so where did I go wrong ?? pls ignore my previou
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, ethan managed to produce:
| oh sorry: checked in var/log/messages and got the same thing:
|
| Dec 3 19:13:11 Echelon ntpdate[1939]: no server suitable for
| synchronization found
|
| so where did I go wrong ?? pls ignore my previous post many thanks...
Can be one of two
oh sorry: checked in var/log/messages and got the same thing:
Dec 3 19:13:11 Echelon ntpdate[1939]: no server suitable for
synchronization found
so where did I go wrong ?? pls ignore my previous post many thanks...
Jasper Jans wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, ethan managed to produce:
>
>| o
now if you can just enlighten me if 1) I did the correct thing, 2) where
to find the output of the logs ?? Many thanks
Jasper Jans wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, ethan managed to produce:
>
>| ok guys, I am trying this:
>|
>| ntpdate -s ntp.ucsd.edu ns.scruz.net ntp1.cs.wisc.edu
>
>ntpdate -s
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, ethan managed to produce:
| ok guys, I am trying this:
|
| ntpdate -s ntp.ucsd.edu ns.scruz.net ntp1.cs.wisc.edu
ntpdate -s will indeed not show output - it will use
syslog for that...
---
# /usr/local/bin/ntpdate -uv mail.bio.vu.nl
3 Dec 10:24:47 ntpdate[11601]: ntpdate 4.
ok guys, I am trying this:
ntpdate -s ntp.ucsd.edu ns.scruz.net ntp1.cs.wisc.edu
at least it does not show any output how do I tell if its working as
compared to the -u option where I got:
[root@Echelon ethan]# ntpdate -u ntp.ucsd.edu ns.scruz.net ntp1.cs.wisc.edu
3 Dec 18:13:05 ntpdate[
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Petr Jerabek managed to produce:
| No, you MUST FIRST RUN "NTP daemon"
|
| /etc/init.d/ntpd start
That is wrong.
ntpdate and ntp do not need each other in order to function
correctly. Infact - if you would start ntpd and then try
to use ntpdate it will fail telling you that t
gt;L> -Original Message-
>>L> From: Edward Dekkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>L> Sent: Monday, 3 December 2001 21:54
>>L> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>L> Subject: Re: Time syncing
>>
>>
>>>>I need to manage automatics time syncing (GMT
bin/ntpdate -u time-a.nist.govL> updates every 6 hours and even reports to /var/spool/mail/rootL> it works fo me!L> MikeL> -Original Message-L> From: Edward Dekkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]L> Sent: Monday, 3 December 2001 21:54L> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]L> Subject: Re
TED]]
L> Sent: Monday, 3 December 2001 21:54
L> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
L> Subject: Re: Time syncing
>> I need to manage automatics time syncing (GMT +1). I think about 1 hour
>> checking for correct time in CRONTAB.
>> HOW TO DO IT???
L> man ntpdate
L> man hwcl
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Time syncing
> I need to manage automatics time syncing (GMT +1). I think about 1 hour
> checking for correct time in CRONTAB.
> HOW TO DO IT???
man ntpdate
man hwclock
Regards,
--
Edward Dekkers (Director)
Triple D Computer Services Pty. Ltd.
822 Rowley Road
Oa
> I need to manage automatics time syncing (GMT +1). I think about 1 hour
> checking for correct time in CRONTAB.
> HOW TO DO IT???
man ntpdate
man hwclock
Regards,
--
Edward Dekkers (Director)
Triple D Computer Services Pty. Ltd.
822 Rowley Road
Oakford W.A. 6121
+61 8 9397-1040
AB
Hi,
I need to manage automatics time syncing (GMT +1). I think about 1 hour
checking for correct time in CRONTAB.
HOW TO DO IT???
thanx
Petr
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
March 2000 13:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [OT] Time syncing NT boxes (was: Time
Server)
Jim Cunning wrote:
> There's also an NT (shareware, I think) program called
"atomtime" that
> Is NTP the so-called "Time of Day" service (I think on Port 7)?
Time is on 37
SNTP is on 123
Port 7 is echo.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Is NTP the so-called "Time of Day" service (I think on Port 7)?
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony E. Greene [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 3:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Time syncing
>
> "Tanner, Robb
"Tanner, Robby" wrote:
>
> Should you not be able to write a service that uses the NetRemoteTOD API
> call? Is the time syncing to be done in a heterogeneous environment
> (Linux/WinNT/Novell) etc?
> I remember the initial question, but what are everyone's requir
Should you not be able to write a service that uses the NetRemoteTOD API
call? Is the time syncing to be done in a heterogeneous environment
(Linux/WinNT/Novell) etc?
I remember the initial question, but what are everyone's requirements? I'd
like to write a generic little something th
Jim Cunning wrote:
> There's also an NT (shareware, I think) program called "atomtime" that
> will talk to a time server, configurable.
Several years ago, a small company I was with selected a shareware program
called Tardis. It worked well and pricing was very sane.
Just recently, I had to lo
Or yet another way
Get something like Tardis (or a similar freeware product which runs as a
service on NT)
Get the NT box/s to do the time serving, and use cron and rdate to set to
these , I have to look at how to get Novell to play in this time game as
well, but honestly have not looked into i
Yes for windows atomtime. I got it on a Pc World shareware disc. It is
shareware. It syncs your clock and stuff. I've since uninstalled it though, not
because it wasn't good but I had to remove clutter.
Jim Cunning wrote:
> There's also an NT (shareware, I think) program called "atomtime" th
There's also an NT (shareware, I think) program called "atomtime" that
will talk to a time server, configurable.
Jim Cunning
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> Ward William E PHDN wrote:
> > It works almost flawlessly... the signals are in sync, and I can't see
> > any apparent diff
Ward William E PHDN wrote:
> It works almost flawlessly... the signals are in sync, and I can't see
> any apparent differences in those machines. Of course, now I need
> to sync these stupid NT boxes in
How about using NT's "at" command to setup a regularly scheduled job to sync
the NT boxes
31 matches
Mail list logo
