On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 07:19:28PM -0500, Matt Rowley wrote:
> >Cool - much more then originally thought. Thnx. Btw, any sites you could
> >point me at that would sell RAM for such an old machine? Thnx again.
>
> Ebay's probably your best bet.
Keep in mind that all you need are 72pin fast/page
Maximum RAM in a Sparc Classic is 96MB regular and 128MB inofficially.
The latter can be achieved by using two 32MB SIMMs in the first two
sockets.
Cool - much more then originally thought. Thnx. Btw, any sites you could
point me at that would sell RAM for such an old machine? Thnx again.
Eb
Hi there.
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Ribbrock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: Sparc Linux
> FIRST of all: PLEASE do *not* simply reply to an existing thread and
change
> the subj
FIRST of all: PLEASE do *not* simply reply to an existing thread and change
the subject if you want to ask a new, unrelated question. It screws the
threading for those people who are using a capable mail program, making it
harder to follow things. PLEASE write a NEW message instead. THANKS!
As fo
er kernels such as the late 2.2
series or even the 2.4 series. I believe that my Sparc is more or less an
IPX repackaged and resold - so my box would be included. If it is still true
and Sparc Linux on my machine would be noticably slower then *BSD, no
biggie. This is just my play box - my main box
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 05:21:51PM -0600, Steve Feehan wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Isaiah Weiner wrote:
>
> >
> > What kind of SPARC is it?
> >
>
>
> This particular box is a SPARCstation 2, but I will also be installing on
> several SPARCstation LX's.
On *most* of the SPARCstation
I had the same problem on a Sparc 2--aparently it is specific to something
on the Sparc 2. I was able to install RedHat 6.0 on the same machine.
I haven't tried the 6.2 beta -- you might want to try it (assuming here is a
Sparc version, I haven't checked).
I finally gave up and installed OpenBSD
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHEA1999045-01.html
2. Problem description:
An anaconda boot disk and updates disk are now available which fixes the
following problems:
Type 0x0f partitions not being recognized as extended
HPFS and NTFS partitions not bei
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Isaiah Weiner wrote:
>
> What kind of SPARC is it?
>
This particular box is a SPARCstation 2, but I will also be installing on
several SPARCstation LX's.
--
Steve Feehan
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 05:00:12PM -0600, Steve Feehan wrote:
> I have tried installing the 6.1 version of Redhat for sparc several times
> and the installation always fails after the ldconfig package is installed.
>
> I have downloaded the iso, mounted it on another linux box, exported the
> mou
I have tried installing the 6.1 version of Redhat for sparc several times
and the installation always fails after the ldconfig package is installed.
I have downloaded the iso, mounted it on another linux box, exported the
mount point (/etc/cdrom) via nfs. I thought that maybe the iso was bad so
I
Is there something that I should know to compile thing on RH4.2-sparc???
Seems that I am either having header or library problems
TIA
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
12 matches
Mail list logo
