TECTED]]On Behalf Of Nick White
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:19 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Slapper Worm on openssl 0.9.6b(-28)
>From the changelog: (via rpm -q --changelog)
* Thu Aug 01 2002 Nalin Dahyabhai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.9.6b-28
- update asn patch
al Message-
From: Trevor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Slapper Worm on openssl 0.9.6b(-28)
"rpm -q --changelog openssl | grep ASN" can tell you the same thing...
without the tech support .
Trevor.
-Orig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Nick White posted the following:
NW>That's exactly why I contacted RedHat... They don't have information
NW>anywhere about the worm on their web site.
I dunno why but this satisfied my curiosity:
http://www.redhat.com/support
Subject: RE: Slapper Worm on openssl 0.9.6b(-28)
That's exactly why I contacted RedHat... They don't have information
anywhere about the worm on their web site. I received a response back from
a higher level tech support person at RedHat confirming that the up2date
openssl package 0.9
Regards,
Erik
-Original Message-
From: Anthony E. Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Slapper Worm on openssl 0.9.6b
*** PGP Signature Status: good
*** Signer: Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Inva
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-Sep-2002/13:22 -0400, Jason Costomiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 01:14:19PM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
>: Specifically 0.9.6b-28. Earlier 0.9.6b packages (ie; 0.9.6b-24 and
>: 0.9.6b-8) may not have the fix for thi
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 01:14:19PM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
: Specifically 0.9.6b-28. Earlier 0.9.6b packages (ie; 0.9.6b-24 and
: 0.9.6b-8) may not have the fix for this vulnerability.
:
: I really wish RH would make some kind of explicit announcement about this.
You mean, like this:
ht
On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 13:14, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> I really wish RH would make some kind of explicit announcement about this.
They've done.
http://www.redhat.com/support/alerts/linux_slapper_worm.html
--
Saul Arias - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-Sep-2002/07:42 -0700, Nick White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've called RedHat about the "Slapper" worm and it appears that the RHN
>package 0.9.6b is safe.
[snip]
Specifically 0.9.6b-28. Earlier 0.9.6b packages (ie; 0.9.6b-24 and
0.9.6b-8) ma
I've called RedHat about the "Slapper" worm and it appears that the RHN
package 0.9.6b is safe. Below is a response from their support.
__
Description of your problem:
using openssl 0.9.6b from the Red Hat Network. Is this vulnerable from the
slapper worm?
Ou
10 matches
Mail list logo
