Re: Scheduler Functions

2000-05-04 Thread rpjday
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Charles Galpin wrote: > adding a subject doesn't help you learn (or get others to do your homework > for you) either. > > heck, at least take a moment to paraphrase the damn question in your own > words. geesh > > it's also off topic. > > charles > > On Wed, 3 May 2000 [EM

Re: Scheduler Functions

2000-05-04 Thread Dave Ihnat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have the following questions: > > > > < > > looking suspiciously like an assignment, elided>> Hmm...aren't we supposed to do our own homework? -- Dave Ihnat [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscrib

Re: Scheduler Functions

2000-05-04 Thread Charles Galpin
adding a subject doesn't help you learn (or get others to do your homework for you) either. heck, at least take a moment to paraphrase the damn question in your own words. geesh it's also off topic. charles On Wed, 3 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have the following questions: > > > >

Scheduler Functions

2000-05-03 Thread moussakx
I have the following questions: > > A. Using the Linux kernel source, describe how the three > > interval timers ITIMER_REAL, ITIMER_VIRTUAL, TIMER_PROF are > > implemented. > > > > B. How would you use ITIMER_VIRTUAL, TIMER_PROF interval timers > > to profile a proc