Hal Burgiss wrote:
> I haven't noticed a slowdown, but would like to have an idea what kind
> of load the system is under.
That's the reason I was concerned about it, too. It seems, however,
it's not important enough to spend the time to get right. I'm not too
worried. It only affects applica
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 12:50:02AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Hal Burgiss wrote:
> > Top seems to show X CPU % to fluctuate a fair amount. Occasional
> > spikes from less than 1% to 20-30% while I am just sitting watching
> > top. If I constantly drag a window around it will bump up to 80% or
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> Top seems to show X CPU % to fluctuate a fair amount. Occasional
> spikes from less than 1% to 20-30% while I am just sitting watching
> top. If I constantly drag a window around it will bump up to 80% or
> so. On the otherhand ps almost always shows X at about 4%. Little to
>
I've noticed a very large difference in the way top and ps are
reporting CPU load. Below is a comparison of 2 taken fairly close
together:
Top:
-CPU%-
664 root 11 0 65792 55M 2932 S 0 31.9 44.4 76:37 X
ps:
-CPU%-
