Re: Redhat list signature

2002-07-18 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 12:13:15PM -0700, Michael S. Dunsavage wrote: > and if it was a perfect world ...your posting wouldn't have been sent the way it was (top writing, unnecessasry full quote)... SCNR, Thomas -- http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html

Re: Redhat list signature

2002-07-18 Thread Kevin Myers
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:22:25 -0400, you wrote: >It would even be nicer if most people's sigs were that way, and if they >replied below the original text, and if they snipped appropriately, and if >they used good subject lines, and if I hit the lottery... oops! Sorry >about that. I got carried awa

RE: Redhat list signature

2002-07-17 Thread Michael S. Dunsavage
and if it was a perfect world -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony E. Greene Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Redhat list signature On 17-Jul-2002/18:45 +0700, Kevin Myers <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Redhat list signature

2002-07-17 Thread Anthony E. Greene
On 17-Jul-2002/18:45 +0700, Kevin Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Would it be a good idea if the Redhat list sig were to include the standard >"-- " delimiter, so it wouldn't keep appearing multiple times, and I >wouldn't have to keep deleting it from my replies? It would even be nicer if most

Redhat list signature

2002-07-17 Thread Kevin Myers
Would it be a good idea if the Redhat list sig were to include the standard "-- " delimiter, so it wouldn't keep appearing multiple times, and I wouldn't have to keep deleting it from my replies? ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://