Charles,
Thank you for the info.
Steven
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/8/2000 at 9:52 PM Charles Galpin wrote:
>Hi Steven
>
>On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Steven Pierce wrote:
>
>>
>> Charles,
>>
>> Thank you for this information. I am a little behind on my mail. So I did not get
>>
At 03:47 PM 08/10/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Roy Harrison wrote:
> >
> > check /etc/nsswitch.conf file. it has the order of lookup in there.
> >
> > Roy
>
>I thought that was only used for NIS?
>
>
>Bret
Nope... it can also cause long delays in logging on if it's not configured
right.
Roy
__
Roy Harrison wrote:
>
> check /etc/nsswitch.conf file. it has the order of lookup in there.
>
> Roy
I thought that was only used for NIS?
Bret
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
At 01:18 PM 08/10/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>Interesting, as that's what mine looks like too...
>
>Of course, I'm using my ISP's doamin rather than my own... Maybe that's the
>problem, but I would think it woud pull them from my hosts file before it
>went off looking for a DNS..
>
>hermm... What's
> -Original Message-
> From: Bret Hughes [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 12:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Redhat and DSL
>
> "Burke, Thomas G." wrote:
>
> > I thought I had done this, already... Which fil
"Burke, Thomas G." wrote:
> I thought I had done this, already... Which files are they, I don't recall
> now.
/etc/host.conf
here is what mine looks like
order hosts,bind
multi on
you can add the ipaddresses for the machines on your local net in the
/etc/hosts file
the following format works
, 2000 4:36 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Redhat and DSL
>
> Sure! Change the order that your machine checks the names
> set it to check files first, then dns. You should be able
> to do this in a number of places, including Linuxconf.
>
&g
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Redhat and DSL
Sorry to come in late to this exchange...
I ave no DNS installed on my machine. However, I am running an internal
network 0n 192.168.68.x...
These machines need to have names, so I chose names I new were unused on my
ISP's net
easier to read.
Any suggestions?
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Galpin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 2:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Redhat and DSL
>
> Agreed.
>
> However, a "caching only" n
Agreed.
However, a "caching only" nameserver, only serving the internal interface
can be a nice performance boost, and is safe. I had mentioned this
originaly (along with a dhcpd server) as an enhancement, and was probably
a bad idea to bring it up at that point :)
Lets' hope he finds the time t
On Wed, 09 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> yes, I think in my original email I sugegsted that. Just be be clear
> though, on each machine (windows and linux) he should
>
> 1. put the name/ip pairs of all machines on his LAN in the
> "hosts" file. This is /etc/hosts for linux, and somewhere under the
> win
yes, I think in my original email I sugegsted that. Just be be clear
though, on each machine (windows and linux) he should
1. put the name/ip pairs of all machines on his LAN in the
"hosts" file. This is /etc/hosts for linux, and somewhere under the
windows dir for windows (use the find feature a
On Tue, 08 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> Charles,
>
> Thank you for this information. I am a little behind on my mail. So I did not get
> to this until today. I am getting ready to do this next week. Wife gone all week,
>so
> I will have some more time Question... Can you put the DNS servers
Hi Steven
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Steven Pierce wrote:
>
> Charles,
>
> Thank you for this information. I am a little behind on my mail. So I did not get
> to this until today. I am getting ready to do this next week. Wife gone all week,
>so
> I will have some more time Question... Can
Charles,
Thank you for this information. I am a little behind on my mail. So I did not get
to this until today. I am getting ready to do this next week. Wife gone all week, so
I will have some more time Question... Can you put the DNS servers behind the
firewall for protection?? Or is
Hi Nigel
You got several answers, all quite correct, but proabbly a bit high
level. Let me try describe what everyone is suggesting the way I'd like it
explained to me ;)
She will want to configure her LAN as follows. Sorry, but my ascii art
sucks
internet
|
DSL router/modem
Thanks very much Jamin, I'll be in touch on Monday.
-Original Message-
From: Jamin Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 July 2000 15:09
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Redhat and DSL
There are a few different ways to do what you are looking for. From my
po
Thanks very much Bret - I'll give this a go on Monday.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 July 2000 15:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Redhat and DSL
Nigel Trivass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hoping someone can help me
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 7:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Redhat and DSL
Importance: High
Hi,
I'm hoping someone can help me help a colleague in the US, with the
setting up of a small networkusing the following:
PC [win98], NT server, Redhat server,
Nigel Trivass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hoping someone can help me help a colleague in the US, with the
> setting up of a small networkusing the following:
>
> PC [win98], NT server, Redhat server, a hub, a router and DSL
>
> None of the above are currently networked together.
>
> We have purch
Hi,
I'm hoping someone can help me help a colleague in the US, with the
setting up of a small networkusing the following:
PC [win98], NT server, Redhat server, a hub, a router and DSL
None of the above are currently networked together.
We have purchased one fixed IP address from Flashn
21 matches
Mail list logo
