Hi Alan,
> > mount -t ufs -o ufstype=44bsd /dev/sdb[5-8] /mnt/BSD
> > Partition check:
> > sdb:
> >sdb1:
>
> Iirc you have to mount the whole slice at once. The subpartitions are then
> recognized. In your case that would be mount -t ufs -o ufstype=44bsd /dev/sdb1
> /mnt/BSD
Oops :(
Hi Alan,
> mount -t ufs -o ufstype=44bsd /dev/sdb[5-8] /mnt/BSD
>
> meaning, for each of the entries under the extended partition entry
> each rendering the generic and not too helpful message:
>
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda[5-8],
>or too many mounted
"Leonard den Ottolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Alan,
>
> > Downsizing has taken it toll in my company and now I've got the job of
> > recovering the files from a couple of projects off a couple of drives
> > a co-worker was using on a FreeBSD OS box. With all the other
> > filesystem
Hi Alan,
> Downsizing has taken it toll in my company and now I've got the job of
> recovering the files from a couple of projects off a couple of drives
> a co-worker was using on a FreeBSD OS box. With all the other
> filesystems addressed by kernel modules, I was sure I'd be able to
> scan th
Downsizing has taken it toll in my company and now I've got the job of
recovering the files from a couple of projects off a couple of drives
a co-worker was using on a FreeBSD OS box. With all the other
filesystems addressed by kernel modules, I was sure I'd be able to
scan the drive. Now I'm no
