RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-11 Thread Mark Basil
l. --Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leonard den Ottolander Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Hi Bill, > So, how do I restore the dual boot w

RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-11 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Bill, > So, how do I restore the dual boot without a boot diskette? Can I > just use my CD with the install disk to mount the drives? That should be fine. Bye, Leonard. _

RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-11 Thread Ward William E PHDN
ed to find Toms Root Boot to restore what Billy Boy destroyed? Bill Ward -Original Message- From: Darryl Harvey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 8:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jude. T Subject: RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ... Try this another way. Put Lin

Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-10 Thread Luke C Gavel
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, David Talkington wrote: > Changing the subject just a bit ... in my experience (contrary to > jude.t's, it seems), evangelizing aside, Windows is losing what was > once one of its primary strengths compared to Linux, which is ease of > install. Lately, RH is child's play to

Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-09 Thread David Talkington
> > in addition (and i've had this conversation before, not sure if >it was on this mailing list), regardless of what the red hat >install guide says, win2k appears to be no more trouble to dual boot >than 95 or 98, NTFS or no NTFS. i'm typing this on a dell inspiron >that had three NTFS primary

Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-09 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Stew, > Do you use the W2K boot loader or LILO? I've just setup W2K, and haven't > been able to get my lilo on another drive to load it. Of course it > insisted I remove my SuSE7.0 install before I could install W2K. There is a hack for this, which I used with a Win98 sys

Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-09 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 10:46:24AM -0400, Luke C Gavel wrote: > As it was pointed out in an earlier reply, you would need a > multi-OS expert, not just a Linux expert. OR you need the time and inclination to actually *read* the documentation available--especially HOWTOs--about this issue and then

Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-09 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 05:05:21AM -0500, rpjday wrote: > ... subtitled: a man really should know his limitations. > > a recent security column in the nov 27 issue of computerworld is the > perfect example of why people who don't understand linux shouldn't be bad > mouthing it. > > <> You've j

Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-09 Thread Luke C Gavel
Okay... As it was pointed out in an earlier reply, you would need a multi-OS expert, not just a Linux expert. Win98 is not as difficult to set up as WinNT or Win2k. One reason for this might be because Win98 uses the 'vfat' filesystem which is easier to access than WinNT's 'ntfs' filesystem for

Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-09 Thread rpjday
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Stew Benedict wrote: > > Do you use the W2K boot loader or LILO? I've just setup W2K, and haven't > been able to get my lilo on another drive to load it. Of course it > insisted I remove my SuSE7.0 install before I could install W2K. w2k first, linux afterwards, with LILO

Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-09 Thread Stew Benedict
Do you use the W2K boot loader or LILO? I've just setup W2K, and haven't been able to get my lilo on another drive to load it. Of course it insisted I remove my SuSE7.0 install before I could install W2K. Thanks, Stew Benedict > it was on this mailing list), regardless of what the red hat >

RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-09 Thread Darryl Harvey
Try this another way. Put Linux on a machine, then try to install Windo$e (any flavour) as a dual boot box. You can't can you... Windo$e insists that it is the only OS on the machine.. (or primary OS if you want t get technical) Windo$e will install fine, but it will wipe the other OS boot i

Re: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-09 Thread rpjday
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Luke C Gavel wrote: > Okay... > > As it was pointed out in an earlier reply, you would need a > multi-OS expert, not just a Linux expert. Win98 is not as > difficult to set up as WinNT or Win2k. One reason for this might > be because Win98 uses the 'vfat' filesystem which is

RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-09 Thread Darryl Harvey
I guess maybe we are also missing another point. Why is this Linux's fault?? Maybe it is Microsoft aversion to two operating systems that makes it so hard (if it is). Linux and Lilo are quite comfortable with one, two three or four (or more) boot devices or OS's. So are other operating syste

RE: why linux gets such a bad rap ...

2000-12-09 Thread Paul Anderson
All I have to say to this is that my 14 year old daughter installed 7.0 on a dual boot machine (the 98 was already installed), having never installed an operating system in her life. Except for some help with disk partitioning, she did it without help. I tried this as an experiment to see how mu