Re: vmlinuz vs vmlinux

2001-04-25 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, rpjday wrote: >> I notice in the /boot directory that I have : >> >> vmlinuz-2.4.2-2 785602 bytes, and >> vmlinux-2.4.2-2 2271899 bytes. >> >> What is the difference? I thought vmlinuz was the kernel filed that was >> called on 'boot' but this particular file is small at le

Re: vmlinuz vs vmlinux

2001-04-25 Thread Ted Gervais
On Wednesday 25 April 2001 10:15, you wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Ted Gervais wrote: > > I notice in the /boot directory that I have : > > > > vmlinuz-2.4.2-2 785602 bytes, and > > vmlinux-2.4.2-2 2271899 bytes. > > > > What is the difference? I thought vmlinuz was the kernel filed that was >

Re: vmlinuz vs vmlinux

2001-04-25 Thread Mike Burger
vmlinuz is the compressed kernel. For example, when you compile your own kernels, part of the process is "make bzImage" (used to be "make zImage"). This makes it a bit easier to load into memory, copy to floppy disks, etc. Notice that vmlinux is 2.25MB...you'd never get that onto a floppy to ma

Re: vmlinuz vs vmlinux

2001-04-25 Thread rpjday
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Ted Gervais wrote: > > > I notice in the /boot directory that I have : > > vmlinuz-2.4.2-2 785602 bytes, and > vmlinux-2.4.2-2 2271899 bytes. > > What is the difference? I thought vmlinuz was the kernel filed that was > called on 'boot' but this particular file is small at

RE: vmlinuz vs. vmlinux

2000-08-29 Thread Jeff Graves
Vmlinuz is the compressed kernel. The one that actually boots. Vmlinux is the uncompressed version. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Manuel Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: vmlinuz vs. vmlinux Do