i'm just wondering
why have a router
THEN a firewall
and THEN a hub with multipule machiens on it?
isn't the router serving as a firewall itself?
why have two?
why not connect the linux box to the modem
and not use the router at all?
_
daniel a. g. quinn
starv
Ok, thx for the info. I'm looking forward to it tomorrow. I've had dialup
here in the desert that gives me an average download of 1.5 k/s. Sick. So,
even 20k will be one hell of a mark up. Sounds like it will be fine. Thx.
Jim.
On Tue, 7 May 2002 09:50:03 -0500
Billy R Nordyke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have them connected with ethernet cards and a hub also. On the fast
computers they are netgear cards. Don't have the model right handy. On
the 486 it's a generic 16 bit card. That really doesn't seem to make
much difference. It does seem that keeping the activity on the computer
connect
I was concerned about the secondary connections at 20k. How do you have
them connected? I will have mine connected with ethernet cards and a hub,
will that help any? The primary computer will be a dell laptop with xp
loaded.
Is it stable?
Jim.
On Tue, 7 May 2002 09:25:19 -0500
Billy R Nordyke
Hi,
I've been using Pegasus Direct satellite internet for a few months now.
As far as I know it doesn't support linux either. I have 3 computers
networked together and receive the satellite transmissions on one with an
AMD Athlon 1.4G processor. The others, one similar to the first dual
boots t
** Reply to message from julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 06 May 2002
21:06:45 -0700
> I never had to consider security issues before, therefore I would also
> appreciate if you could point me to some good tutorials.
Oskar Andreasson has gone to a lot of work just for you, Julius. Check out
Has anyone had any experiences with Direcway satellite? I set up a network
between 7.2 and MS XP. Direcway states they do not support linux because
the software is windows only.
Is there anyone here that uses satellite? Just curious for feedback.
Jim.
On Tue, 7 May 2002 00:43:10 -0400 (EDT)
We
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Harry Putnam wrote:
> julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am glad to see discussion about system security because I am just
> > considering to build a small LAN.
> > Currently, I use a DSL connection with a SMC Barricade router in front of my
> > RedHat 7.2 box. SM
julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am glad to see discussion about system security because I am just
> considering to build a small LAN.
> Currently, I use a DSL connection with a SMC Barricade router in front of my
> RedHat 7.2 box. SMC advertised Barricade as a router that has an effecti
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Mike Chambers blurted out:
MC>Try this link and check out logcheck and portsentry.
MC>
MC>http://www.psionic.com
MC>
MC>I haven't checked but these may or may not be on the powertools cd as well.
They are both on the powertools CD from Seawolf as well as hostsentry.
--
Chuc
Try this link and check out logcheck and portsentry.
http://www.psionic.com
I haven't checked but these may or may not be on the powertools cd as well.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Red Hat Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday
Actually, I decided to go with a Linux based appliance Firewall...
http://www.smoothwall.org It's free, it's small, it'll do either PPP,
ISDN, or Network firewalling (T1, T3, External ISDN, External Cablemodem,
etc.), and has the ability to even have a DMZ. Works great on
throw-away quality ha
I like snort the best.
www.snort.org
-Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Ashley M. Kirchner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 3:49 PM
To: Red Hat Mailing List
Subject: System (security) monitors?
What are the best (or perhaps the most common) firewall (and
othe
13 matches
Mail list logo
