Re: ssl for webmin......installing net:ssleay

2003-10-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- NOT OK Running make test Can't test without successful make Running make install make had returned bad status, install seems impossible Original Message: - From: Michael Mansour [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 11:13:50 +1000 (EST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: R

Re: ssl for webmin......installing net:ssleay

2003-10-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My name is Blair :) LOL and it has 64 .It didnt matter before though it went no problem.Just now its puking Original Message: - From: Wendell MacKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:20:33 -0300 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ssl for webmin

Re: ssl for webmin......installing net:ssleay

2003-10-17 Thread Wendell MacKenzie
How much memory do you have on the machine you're installing this on Keith? - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:08 PM Subject: ssl for webmin..installing net:ssleay > Hi :) > > trying to install webmin with ssl supp

Re: ssl for webmin......installing net:ssleay (Tom Dolce is out of the office)

2003-10-17 Thread TOM DOLCE
In my absence you may contact Thang Diep at 322-6190, Dennis Merritt at 323-7392 or the help desk at 322-0704. I will be back in the office Monday October 27th. >>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 10/17/03 18:13 >>> > trying to install webmin with ssl suppport on a > redhat 9 server .not taking > did

Re: ssl for webmin......installing net:ssleay

2003-10-17 Thread Michael Mansour
> trying to install webmin with ssl suppport on a > redhat 9 server .not taking > did it the exact same way before then reformated > the machine but when I > test the net:ssleay module after compilation to > install I get the following > out put > > >

RE: SSL for IIS?

2003-10-08 Thread Devon Harding - GTHLA
Is there a good site that shows how this is done? -Devon -Original Message- From: Saqib Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 5:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SSL for IIS? yea, you are just signing your IIS server's Public Key(plus some identi

Re: SSL for IIS?

2003-10-07 Thread Saqib Ali
yea, you are just signing your IIS server's Public Key(plus some identifying info) using your OpenSSL based CA. It should work just fine. However you will have to include the certificate of your Root CA (openssl) into all of the client browsers. Saqib Ali - http://www.xml-dev.com On Tue,

Re: ssl

2003-07-11 Thread Mr. L.R. Adrian
The do a search on your conf file and see if you can see the port it's calling "98" Les - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:31 AM Subject: RE: ssl > > The conf input looks good. But if

RE: ssl

2003-07-11 Thread Cleveland
> The conf input looks good. But if it's returning that error > something is amiss. Just an idea: check the listen command , > again in the conf fileI'm not sure of your config but > mine reads Listen 80 {that's for all virt users} I've got: Listen 199.242.176.174:80 Listen 199.242.176.168:

Re: ssl

2003-07-10 Thread Mr. L.R. Adrian
it's locked too. i'm trying :o) Les - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:38 PM Subject: RE: ssl > > IP based host is good for SSL but it sounds like nothing is > > pointing that IP

RE: ssl

2003-07-10 Thread Cleveland
> IP based host is good for SSL but it sounds like nothing is > pointing that IP Address at your server and your server > should be set up to acknowledge it is the server or > nameserver for that IP. Look in your httpd.conf file. Look > for the entry you made. the opener should read like this.

Re: ssl

2003-07-10 Thread Mr. L.R. Adrian
10, 2003 11:49 AM Subject: RE: ssl > > Are you running virtual hosting? > > IP based virtual host. > > Jody > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list

RE: ssl

2003-07-10 Thread Cleveland
> Are you running virtual hosting? IP based virtual host. Jody -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: ssl

2003-07-10 Thread Cleveland
> Do you have the IP setup in your DNS? Do you mean the Hosts tab of the Network configuration? If so, no it's not there. Jody -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: ssl

2003-07-10 Thread Mr. L.R. Adrian
Also, Do you have the IP setup in your DNS? les - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:24 AM Subject: ssl > Hello, > > I'm using the Apache configuration tool in redhat 9, and I'm trying to > setup ssl with it. I read the

Re: ssl

2003-07-10 Thread Mr. L.R. Adrian
Hi Jody Need a lil more info than that. Are you running virtual hosting? IP or Name Based? If it's name based it'll call back to 443 on default domain. The 98 sounds like a problem I had so I dont use the apache config anymore. Les - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL

Re: ssl

2003-03-10 Thread David Busby
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 07:29 Subject: Re: ssl > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:04:24PM +0100, Ronald Hermans wrote: > > For a test environment we need a ftp server to which we can connect in a > > secure way. We were able to connect to the ftp server with sftp. This > > co

Re: ssl

2003-03-10 Thread Achille Miele
On Monday 10 March 2003 13:51, Ronald Hermans wrote: > Hi, > > I downloaded the BSDftpd-ssl package and installed it. > It still gives the same reaction, > > Any other suggentions (please) I'm almost newbie to this, anyway I have bsdftpd-ssl functioning on my machine, so I'll try to understand be

Re: ssl

2003-03-10 Thread Ed Wilts
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:04:24PM +0100, Ronald Hermans wrote: > For a test environment we need a ftp server to which we can connect in a > secure way. We were able to connect to the ftp server with sftp. This > connection connects thru ssh. But as it turns out there is an other way to > make a se

RE: ssl

2003-03-10 Thread Ronald Hermans
Hi, I downloaded the BSDftpd-ssl package and installed it. It still gives the same reaction, Any other suggentions (please) > -Original Message- > From: Achille Miele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: maandag 10 maart 2003 12:24 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re:

Re: ssl

2003-03-10 Thread Achille Miele
On Monday 10 March 2003 12:04, Ronald Hermans wrote: > For a test environment we need a ftp server to which we can connect in a > secure way. We were able to connect to the ftp server with sftp. This > connection connects thru ssh. But as it turns out there is an other way to > make a secured conne

Re: ssl - update server.key?

2003-01-31 Thread Joshua Schmidlkofer
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 12:56, Jody Cleveland wrote: > Hello, > > I setup redhat 8 as localhost. Now, I've changed it to it's normal name > email.winnefox.org. So, I run apachectl startssl and it starts fine. I even > added a listing in ssl.conf for a site. So, I go to https://... and I get an > err

Re: ssl attachment problem

2002-12-28 Thread nate
Michael Rubin said: > > Has anyone else had the problem of attachments not working with ssl? I > have a script which displays a file in the browser window. Everything is > fine with http but does not work correctly with https. The one fix that I > managed to find on the net (see below) does not

RE: ssl attachment problem

2002-12-27 Thread Michael Rubin
After 15+ hours I finally found the fix (msie bug). If anyone is having the same problem you can email me. Michael > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Rubin > Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 10:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: ssl

2002-12-05 Thread Joshua Schmidlkofer
*OR* you [most likely] can say: perl -MCPAN -e 'shell' [If it asks you if you are 'ready to manually config' say :NO] then type install Net::SSLeay this will install it, etc. *note: you must be root. It works great. CPAN is perl's killer app. js On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 07:12, João Pedro

Re: ssl

2002-12-02 Thread João Pedro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have installed webmin to admin my redhat 8 server but I want it secure . I have installed the two modules for it OpenSSL library Net::SSLeay both with rpm's I run the command perl -e 'use Net::SSLeay' to see if there are errors (if no errors then set up fine) and I

Re: ssl problem with webmin

2002-11-29 Thread Bret Hughes
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 12:37, Blair MacDonald wrote: > Hi :) > > > I think I have sent this out in html by mistake the last time ...sorry if I > did > > I have installed webmin to administer my redhat 8 server but I want it > secure . > > I have installed the two modules for it > > OpenSSL lib

Re: SSL Certificate

2000-11-08 Thread Kris Keele
When you create the CSR you also create a private key. That is why they tell you to back it up. You can move that key from one server to another, but I am unsure if you can move it from a Unix box to NT? KRis - Original Message - From: "Fred Edmister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: ssl virtual servers

2000-09-24 Thread Alan Mead
Eric, I didn't see any replies to this and I don't know what your error message means. But I have some ideas. Are you using name- or IP-based hosts? Name-based will not work (per se) with SSL because the name is transmitted by the browser and it is not decrypted until after the server has sort

Re: SSL Vs RSA ?

2000-09-18 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Anthony E and Andrew, > The 128bit session key is then encrypted using the recipient's large > (1024bit) public key. > The recipient's PGP uses his 1024bit private key to decrypt the 128bit > session key. The private 1024 bit key has a known public counterpart (public key),

Re: SSL Vs RSA ?

2000-09-18 Thread Anthony E . Greene
On 18 Sep 2000 03:43 Andrew So Hing-pong wrote: >I have a problem about security that make me feel confusing. >In SSL, it talks about 128 bit encrypted. But in PGP, >it uses 1024 bits for encrytion. At all, which one is more >security. Pls explain it or give me some links to find out. >thanks,

Re: SSL/SSH support in RH 7.0? (was: Re: unsuscribe)

2000-08-31 Thread Greg Wright
*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 31/08/00 at 13:07 John Aldrich wrote: >On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Greg Wright wrote: >> >No, you can email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject >> >"unsubscribe." However, you still have to get your password from >> >them somehow, and I don't know if ther

Re: SSL/SSH support in RH 7.0? (was: Re: unsuscribe)

2000-08-31 Thread John Aldrich
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Greg Wright wrote: > >No, you can email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject > >"unsubscribe." However, you still have to get your password from > >them somehow, and I don't know if there's a way to get it to email > >you back your password. > Re-read my comments above, whi

Re: SSL/SSH support in RH 7.0? (was: Re: unsuscribe)

2000-08-31 Thread Greg Wright
*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 31/08/00 at 9:19 John Aldrich wrote: >On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Steve Frampton wrote: >> >> Hmmm...is using the URL the *only* way of unsubscribing now? It just >> occurred to me that people who didn't have support for SSL connections >> were pretty mu

RE: SSL/SSH support in RH 7.0? (was: Re: unsuscribe)

2000-08-31 Thread John Aldrich
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Ward William E PHDN wrote: > Not everyone runs a graphical machine, John. Some are blind and use > Lynx because it works well with speech systems. Lynx doesn't support > https. Others are using old, marginal systems (hey, isn't that one > of the strengths of Linux?) and don

RE: SSL/SSH support in RH 7.0? (was: Re: unsuscribe)

2000-08-31 Thread Ward William E PHDN
n ask the list to be removed, and one of the folks at RedHat who reads the list can do so. Not the BEST solution, but A solution. Bill Ward -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 9:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SSL/SSH sup

Re: SSL/SSH support in RH 7.0? (was: Re: unsuscribe)

2000-08-31 Thread Kambiz Aghaiepour
You can also send a message with subject "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You'll need to supply a password. You can obtain your password by sending a message with subject "password" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kambiz Steve Frampton wrote: > > > Hmmm...is using the URL the *only* way of unsubscribi

Re: SSL/SSH support in RH 7.0? (was: Re: unsuscribe)

2000-08-31 Thread John Aldrich
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Steve Frampton wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > > > Redhat-list mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > Sorry for minding y

Re: ssl smtp (fwd)

2000-01-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
orwarded message -- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 19:13:36 + (UTC) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ssl smtp please post results from the redhat list here. I'd like to see some discussion of how ssl smtp would work. Does anyone know of any relivant

RE: SSL Certificates

1998-06-09 Thread Paul Pettit
> From: RTS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 1998 3:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: SSL Certificates > > > Where can I get the script to make test certificates for Apache+ssl?? > > Randy > Try doing 'make certificate' from the /usr/local/src/whatever/src dir or where

RE: SSL server

1998-04-26 Thread Michael Hatzakis, Jr MD
iladelphia, PA, 19026 My E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Trevor Astrope [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 25, 1998 5:48 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: SSL server On Sat, 25 Apr 1998, Michael Hatzakis, Jr MD wrote: >

RE: SSL server

1998-04-25 Thread Henrik Edlund
On Sat, 25 Apr 1998, Trevor Astrope wrote: > The apache-ssl isn't intended to be a replacement for the regular apache > server necessarily, but to compliment it by allowing secure transactions > over the net. I removed the old apache though as this one works great for both. -- Henrik Edlund <[

RE: SSL server

1998-04-25 Thread Trevor Astrope
On Sat, 25 Apr 1998, Michael Hatzakis, Jr MD wrote: > By "first" do you mean installing SSL prior to apache install or prior to linux >install? Ie., do I un-install apache then re-install ? > > Mike > The Apache-ssl rpm from ftp.replay.com requires that the SSLeay rpm be installed first or y

RE: SSL server

1998-04-25 Thread Michael Hatzakis, Jr MD
By "first" do you mean installing SSL prior to apache install or prior to linux install? Ie., do I un-install apache then re-install ? Mike Michael Hatzakis Jr, MD Resident Physiatrist - R3 Department of Rehabilitation Thomas Jefferson University Medical Center Philadelphia, PA, 19026 My E-M