RE: reiserfs + LVM

2003-10-06 Thread Cannon, Andrew
ext3 with no problems. (also 6+ months) -Original Message- From: Bret Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: reiserfs + LVM On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 01:50, Chris Purcell wrote: > I'm surprised that no one has answe

Re: reiserfs + LVM

2003-10-06 Thread Bret Hughes
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 01:50, Chris Purcell wrote: > I'm surprised that no one has answered this question. Is anybody using > LVM and/or reiserfs in production environments at all? For those of you > that are using LVM, are you all using ext3 on your logical volumes? > ext3 here with zero proble

Re: reiserfs + LVM

2003-10-06 Thread Chris Purcell
Thanks, I'll go with ext3 then, over reiserfs. Does anyone know why reiserfs is considered experimental in RH, while its the default in other distro's like SuSE? Chris > That's right, reiserfs can be resized dynamically. On mission critical i > found its better to to a backup befor resize. man r

Re: reiserfs + LVM

2003-10-06 Thread funtom
That's right, reiserfs can be resized dynamically. On mission critical i found its better to to a backup befor resize. man resize_reiserfs has a note, this is a BETA program and may corrupt filesystems. From this point i use ext3 with LVM and resize only offline on produktion system. How it looks

Re: reiserfs + LVM

2003-10-05 Thread Chris Purcell
I'm surprised that no one has answered this question. Is anybody using LVM and/or reiserfs in production environments at all? For those of you that are using LVM, are you all using ext3 on your logical volumes? Thanks, Chris > Has anyone used LVM with reiserfs filesystems on a RHEL AS 2.1 > pro