On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 10:58, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:58:28AM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 09:42, Esler, Joel Contractor wrote:
> > > Does the directory have a executable bit set on it for the group?
> > >
> > > J
> > >
> >
> > IIRC that will keep g
On Thursday 19 June 2003 17:06, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 04:41:34PM +0100, MKlinke wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 June 2003 15:50, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> > > i have users u1 u2 u3
> > >
> > > I there home directory, u1 u2 u3 have default umask 022
> > >
> > > I have a directory d1,
On Thursday 19 June 2003 17:09, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 10:41, MKlinke wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 June 2003 15:50, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> > > i have users u1 u2 u3
> > >
> > > I there home directory, u1 u2 u3 have default umask 022
> > >
> > > I have a directory d1, and u1 u2 u3
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 04:41:34PM +0100, MKlinke wrote:
> On Thursday 19 June 2003 15:50, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> > i have users u1 u2 u3
> >
> > I there home directory, u1 u2 u3 have default umask 022
> >
> > I have a directory d1, and u1 u2 u3 need to have r/w access to d1,
> > i put u1 u2 u3
On Thursday 19 June 2003 17:09, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 10:41, MKlinke wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 June 2003 15:50, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> > > i have users u1 u2 u3
> > >
> > > I there home directory, u1 u2 u3 have default umask 022
> > >
> > > I have a directory d1, and u1 u2 u3
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:58:28AM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 09:42, Esler, Joel Contractor wrote:
> > Does the directory have a executable bit set on it for the group?
> >
> > J
> >
>
> IIRC that will keep group ownership the same as the dir but not affect
> the umask. Y
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 10:41, MKlinke wrote:
> On Thursday 19 June 2003 15:50, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> > i have users u1 u2 u3
> >
> > I there home directory, u1 u2 u3 have default umask 022
> >
> > I have a directory d1, and u1 u2 u3 need to have r/w access to d1,
> > i put u1 u2 u3 in group g1 and
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 09:42, Esler, Joel Contractor wrote:
> Does the directory have a executable bit set on it for the group?
>
> J
>
IIRC that will keep group ownership the same as the dir but not affect
the umask. You probably will need to open up the umask if you want the
file to be group w
the x when you ls -al on something
-Original Message-
From: Jianping Zhu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 June 2003 16:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem with group access
Thank you for your reply.
what do you mean by "a excutable bit"?
and how can i check if the
On Thursday 19 June 2003 15:50, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> i have users u1 u2 u3
>
> I there home directory, u1 u2 u3 have default umask 022
>
> I have a directory d1, and u1 u2 u3 need to have r/w access to d1,
> i put u1 u2 u3 in group g1 and use "chmod g+s d1", now all file creat
> by u1 u2 u3 will
Thank you for your reply.
what do you mean by "a excutable bit"?
and how can i check if the directory has a excuttable bit?
Thanks
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:42:23AM -0400, Esler, Joel Contractor wrote:
> Does the directory have a executable bit set on it for the group?
>
> J
>
> -Origina
Does the directory have a executable bit set on it for the group?
J
-Original Message-
From: Jianping Zhu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: problem with group access
i have users u1 u2 u3
I there home directory, u1 u2 u3
12 matches
Mail list logo
