Exactly my point.
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:58:59 -0700, Frank Carreiro wrote:
>
>>Silly nit to be picked, here, but if the communication is to be
>>accomplished over a modem connection, why do you really need encryption?
>>I mean, I don't know that there's a whole lot of packet sniffing from the
>
>Silly nit to be picked, here, but if the communication is to be>accomplished over a modem connection, why do you really need encryption?>I mean, I don't know that there's a whole lot of packet sniffing from the>modem on your system to the modem on the NT box.LOL!!For people like me with faste
Terry Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Why not use wine on the linux box and just use pcanywhere?
Never had much luck with wine at this point. Currently using VMWARE for it,
but would rather get away from MS based code and libraries all together. I
have much more faith in Linux prod
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 4:18 PM
Subject: RE: pcAnywhere Client for Linux
> Silly nit to be picked, here, but if the communication is to be
> accomplished over a modem connection, why do you really need encryption?
> I mean, I don
Mike Burger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Silly nit to be picked, here, but if the communication is to be
> accomplished over a modem connection, why do you really need
> encryption?
> I mean, I don't know that there's a whole lot of packet
> sniffing from the
> modem on your system to the
Silly nit to be picked, here, but if the communication is to be
accomplished over a modem connection, why do you really need encryption?
I mean, I don't know that there's a whole lot of packet sniffing from the
modem on your system to the modem on the NT box.
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Jamin Collins wr
Michael R. Jinks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Don't hold your breath. I haven't looked in a year or two, but IIRC
> your best bet is a Java client if such exists. For Norton to support
Found pcAnywhere Express, which appears to have a Java version with it.
However it is bundled for Win32
Kevin Holmquist wrote:
> Actually, you can tunnel VNC over SSH the same way you would X-windows. You
> can even use ssh clients on Winblows!!!
...or using an SSL wrapper if that's more to your liking.
And, does PCAnywhere do encryption? I have no idea, but I'm willing to
bet that one could do
- Original Message -
From: Frank Carreiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: redhat list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: pcAnywhere Client for Linux
> I wouldn't do it myself. VNC has no encryption and
I wouldn't do it myself. VNC has no encryption and I'm a nut about
security:-)
If there was some way to run VNC under SSH I think it would be a
solution to consider. Of course if security isn't a consideration then
VNC sounds like a great product :-)
Too bad Micro$oft would be offended by
I wouldn't go that far. I've got the VNC server installed on one of my
Windows machines, and I've watched the resources dwindle down to nothing
in rapid fashion...this is on a 350MHz AMD K6/2, with 128MB of RAM.
Granted, I'm not running the most recent VNC server, and it's possible
that things h
Don't hold your breath. I haven't looked in a year or two, but IIRC
your best bet is a Java client if such exists. For Norton to support
Linux would seriously piss off Microsoft, and I doubt they can afford
the risk.
Out of curiosity, why can't you use VNC? It installs alongside
PCAnywhere, do
12 matches
Mail list logo
