** Reply to message from Charles Galpin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 8 Aug 2000 10:15:03 -0400 (EDT)
H. None of the Linksys tulip drivers that I try will compile with
my gcc-2.95-2. Throws out tons of errors. I think I will have to go to
rawhide and try to download the latest gcc build and t
I've had trouble with newer versions of this card. Try using the driver
off their website, instead of Donald Becker's.
hth
charles
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Jack Bowling wrote:
> Having nothing but problems trying to network 2 linux boxes together.
> The problem box has a Linksys Lite-On chipset car
Okay, how are the cables hooked up ? Are the two machines connected
directly to each
other ? If so, is the cable crossed over ? If your going through a hub,
are the cables
in the right order (ie. if your on a cable mode, run the cable->hub
connection through
the uplink connection.. if so, some
Thanks for all of the suggestions. I'm learning. I'm not all that sure that
I'm learning things I really want to know (like in the years that I did my own
car repairs tearing engines apart and putting them sort of back together again)
...and I'm even less sure that I am making progress.
Last ni
on 25/2/2000 12:50 PM, Bill Carlson shot down the bitstream:
> Actually NAT is usually reserved to mapping one IP to another or a group
> of IPs to another group of IPs.
>
> IP Masquerading is actually PAT, Port Address Translation. In that case
> packets are rewritten to contain the IP address
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Edward Marczak wrote:
> on 23/2/2000 11:17 AM, Michael D Green shot down the bitstream:
>
> >> are you using NAT? I don't quite follow.
> >
> > What is NAT?
>
> I didn't see anyone answer this, so here goes:
>
> NAT is Network address translation. A router uses NAT to ch
may I add that in the Linux world, NAT is more commonly called Masquerading.
You will find many more pointers using this name in linux community and webb pages.
Philippe
Edward Marczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on 23/2/2000 11:17 AM, Michael D Green shot down the bitstream:
>
> >> are yo
on 23/2/2000 11:17 AM, Michael D Green shot down the bitstream:
>> are you using NAT? I don't quite follow.
>
> What is NAT?
I didn't see anyone answer this, so here goes:
NAT is Network address translation. A router uses NAT to change your real
IP address outbound, and back again inbound. W
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 11:17:20AM -0500, Michael D Green wrote:
| On Tue, 22 Feb 2000 , Adam Sleight wrote:
| > this stuff is easyjust not the first time you do it...then you'll
| > get the
| > big picture..
| > are you using NAT? I don't quite follow.
| What is NAT?
Network Address Translat
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000 , Adam Sleight wrote:
> Original Message
>
> this stuff is easyjust not the first time you do it...then you'll
> get the
> big picture..
>
> are you using NAT? I don't quite follow.
What is NAT?
> 192.168.1.0/24 network???
What does the /24 mean? I'v
Is it the new LNE100TX ver 2.0 card or is it the slightly older one. I had
one of the new ones in there and I couldn't get it to work. I also tried
using the tulip driver but with no success. I tried the one that Linksys
provides too, both built into the kernel and as a module. Basically, if it
ditto to both of you. I think their website refers you to Donald Beckers
site, but I tried the latest drivers before giving up for a netgear. And
yeas, I have one of the older ones which work great, and were the reason
for buying more.
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, exqt wrote:
> Well if that's the case I'
Well if that's the case I'm gonna be real pissed, because the only reason I
bought their card is because it says it's "Linux compatible" on the box. And
when I do a ifconfig eth0 it does show up as Lite-on. Also the tech support guy
told me I have to get the beta version of the Tulip driver for it
I have a couple of the newest Linksys LNE100TX cards and was never able to
get it to work right. There are three versions of the same card. The latest
ones use the Lite-on (or something like that) chip and it was different, but
still a clone of the DEC Tulip. The latest ones come in a blue and ora
See the howto's, having a static IP simplifies your life greatly...
-JMS
- Original Message -
From: exqt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 1999 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: networking problems
> it's actually a static ip addre
need to set this up...
-JMS
- Original Message -
From: Jon Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 1999 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: networking problems
> how do you get out onto the internet? cable modem? I know squat about
> @Home :(
>
it's actually a static ip address.
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 04:10:03PM -0700, exqt wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi, today I installed Red Hat 6.0 on my system. The installation went
> > perfect, Red Hat detected my network card, I configured everything, but
> > when I rebooted and trie
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 04:10:03PM -0700, exqt wrote:
>
>
> Hi, today I installed Red Hat 6.0 on my system. The installation went
> perfect, Red Hat detected my network card, I configured everything, but
> when I rebooted and tried pinging hostnames/IP's I got "Network
> Unreachable". I don't kn
how do you get out onto the internet? cable modem? I know squat about
@Home :(
try to ping localhost. if that doesnt work, then I suspect the
installation only *appeared* to go perfect.
if it does work, there's a few things you can try.
as root: ifconfig.
this should usually show at least a 'l
19 matches
Mail list logo
