I've ran sensors-detect and this is what i got:
" I will now generate the commands needed to load the I2C modules.
Sometimes, a chip is available both through the ISA bus and an I2C bus.
ISA bus access is faster, but you need to load an additional driver module
for it. If you
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 12:23:40AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Can anyone please tell me what's up, what should I do, is there an
> easy way to install lm_sensors (if that's my problem)? I know Linux is
> supposed to be more low level, but this is becoming surreal..
rpm -Uvh lm_sen
> They should be part of the kernel package.
> I have 21 modules in
> /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/drivers/i2c/
>
> My chipset isn't supported, of course, but that's another story. ;)
> I do have several machines where 'sensors' just works.
Whoops - you're right - they're there - misread the er
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 08:23 pm, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> > Anybody else messing with sensors?
>
> I wasn't until you rang.
>
> I ran up2date lm_sensors, ran 'sensors-detect' and allowed it to go
> through the hoo ha.
>
> Unfortunately my kernel modu
> Anybody else messing with sensors?
I wasn't until you rang.
I ran up2date lm_sensors, ran 'sensors-detect' and allowed it to go through
the hoo ha.
Unfortunately my kernel modules drivers section doesn't contain the
necessary i2c-* drivers (modules).
I can't seem to locate an RPM for the i2c
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: lm_sensors modules
Anyone know the current status of lm_sensors vs. ThinkPad computers?
Ron.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Anyone know the current status of lm_sensors vs. ThinkPad computers?
Ron.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> They're in the kernel rpm. I installed the package, ran the sensor detect
> application (which takes a LONG time - over an hour I think) and it's been
> working nicely since. It still needs some tweaking on my part, but it is
> showing me what might be valid data.
But what do I do if I have d
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 04:34:20PM -0500, Nicolas Bock wrote:
>
> I hope this is not a stupid question, please don't stone me immediately if it
> is :) I would like to use the lm_sensors package. I can't find the kernel
> modules though. Do I have to compile those myself or are they somewhere in
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 12:07:54AM -0400, Jon Knews wrote:
> I followed your instructions below to the letter (I believe). I
> downloaded the i2c-2.5.0.tar.tgz and lm_sensors.2.5.0.tar.tgz, and
> unpacked them in to the /usr/local/src directory to make two
> subdirectories of them. I checked that
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 10:00:02AM -0400, Jon Knews wrote:
> Does anyone know how to get lm_sensors and all it requires,
> installed on kernel 2.2.14-5.0smp (RH6.2)
> PLEASE be specific, and please let me know download site,
> instructions, etc.
First, you have an older versi
Thanks Hal, I'll give it a try with a little more confidence.
Bret
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 11:15:31PM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
> > When installing the rpm for lm_sensors I get the following output.
> > Should I be worried about the missing /dev/i2c-* devices? I will try
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 11:15:31PM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
> When installing the rpm for lm_sensors I get the following output.
> Should I be worried about the missing /dev/i2c-* devices? I will try to
> build the thing tomorrow but If anyone has some information about this I
> would appreciate
13 matches
Mail list logo
