> How likely is this when your running over ppp to an isp?
Don't go on EFNET :)
--
Iain Wade - Optus Internet
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Doesn't seem to be any new users here, and nothing else seems to be happening. It only
happens in multi-user mode, so my guess is some service is not working right.
Jones D \(ISaCS\) writes:
> Not as likely as it would be if you had a permanent connection to
> the net, but still possible.
>
Not as likely as it would be if you had a permanent connection to
the net, but still possible.
regards,
Dave.
> How likely is this when your running over ppp to an isp?
> > The attack we had came from outside our lan and was traced to an isp's
> > customer in another state.
> > > I don't think
How likely is this when your running over ppp to an isp?
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Frederic Herman wrote:
> The attack we had came from outside our lan and was traced to an isp's
> customer in another state.
>
> Fred
>
> Jacob Schmude wrote:
> >
> > I don't think that's the case as this is a home
It is not. However, I've made an interesting discovery. When I put my
linux system into single user mode, this never happens. It is therefore
something in multi-user mode doing this, but I don't know what.
On Wed, 24
Nov 1999, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Jacob Schmude wrote:
> > Funny thing is that
The attack we had came from outside our lan and was traced to an isp's
customer in another state.
Fred
Jacob Schmude wrote:
>
> I don't think that's the case as this is a home system with only 3 users,
> 4 if you include root.
>
> On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Frederic Herman wrote:
>
> > While you're
Jacob Schmude wrote:
> Funny thing is that all my config utils went crazy at the same time. What
> package holds terminfo? Perhaps that's the problem.
terminfo is part of the ncurses package. It could well be the problem.
MSG
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as th
I don't think that's the case as this is a home system with only 3 users,
4 if you include root.
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Frederic Herman wrote:
> While you're at it, check to see if you have any new user's you don't
> know about. I've seen a server break-in where the first clue was the
> TERM bein
That is their default. Also rpm didn't find anything wrong with the
termcap package. Either linuxconf did something, or it doesn't like the
linux term type anymore and won't work right with it.
Funny thing is that all my config utils went crazy at the same time. What
package holds terminfo? Perhap
While you're at it, check to see if you have any new user's you don't
know about. I've seen a server break-in where the first clue was the
TERM being set to dumb. The /bin/login file had been changed and the
cracked version set the TERM that way.
Hope it's not the case.
Fred
Gordon Messmer wr
"Jacob Schmude
>
> It must have done something. When I set vt100 as terminal type, that problem goes
>away, but then my arrow keys don't work properly. It is a plain text console.
The consoles should be of type 'linux', which I understand is pretty
close to vt100, but not quite. Is that not th
It must have done something. When I set vt100 as terminal type, that problem goes
away, but then my arrow keys don't work properly. It is a plain text console.
Gordon Messmer writes:
> "Jacob Schmude
> > After I installed linuxconf 1.16r7, something happened to my configuration utils,
>inclu
"Jacob Schmude
> After I installed linuxconf 1.16r7, something happened to my configuration utils,
>including linuxconf itself. For example, sndconfig, netconfig, and timeconfig were
>effected. The problem is that instead of displaying the little lines for a border and
>around the buttons, now
13 matches
Mail list logo