On a Red Hat 7.2 system the package is mt-st-0.6-1 The command is
/bin/mt
Juan
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Jeff Graves wrote:
> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:42:45 -0500
> From: Jeff Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: C
Brian Ashe wrote:
> Hi lee,
>
> If this is when you are doing a jump to root (su) try "su -" instead. Normal
> users don't have the same path statements as root does, and the dash will
> help you get them when doing a su.
yup and thanks.,
:-)
lee
-
___
lee johnson wrote:
> >
>
> my commands aren't running from the directory they are in ie:
> insmod
>
> i must do
> /sbin/insmod
>
> is that normal for unix/linux?
>
> or does this mean i'm missing some system wide file linking this
> correctly..
Check your PATH variable. As root you should h
Hi lee,
If this is when you are doing a jump to root (su) try "su -" instead. Normal
users don't have the same path statements as root does, and the dash will
help you get them when doing a su.
Have fun,
--
_
Brian Ashe
Looks like you will need to add /sbin to your $PATH environment variable.
How you do this depends on the shell you're using (often it is in .cshrc,
.kshrc, .bashrc, or .profile).
Try `env | grep PATH` to see what directories will be checked. Also, `which
insmod` or `whence insmod` will often tel
27/6/00 12:38 PM, John Aldrich a écrit:
> An option would be a combo boot disk (with CD drivers) and a "rescue"
> CDROM. That way, on the old 486's (and other systems that won't boot
> from a CD) you boot off the floppy and load the CD as your "rescue"
> image. :-)
Hey, sure. Good idea! I cou
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Edward Marczak wrote:
> 26/6/00 10:55 AM, Steven W. Orr a écrit:
>
> > Your best best bet is the lubbock project stored on sourceforge. It's a
> > 50M emergency bootable cd image.
>
> ...great, except for those older 486s that don't CD boot.
>
> > My opinion, emergency root
check out mondo
http://www.microwerks.net/~hugo/index.html
charles
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Gary Nielson wrote:
> Mmm, I just went there and there is nothing to download and the link for
> anonymous ftp
> produces an error. Is there actually something to download yet. I notice
> Linuxcare's Busine
26/6/00 10:55 AM, Steven W. Orr a écrit:
> Your best best bet is the lubbock project stored on sourceforge. It's a
> 50M emergency bootable cd image.
...great, except for those older 486s that don't CD boot.
> My opinion, emergency root boot floppy sets are problematic. The boot
> floppy is no
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Bret Hughes wrote:
> Stephen Liu wrote:
> >
> > Hi Everybody,
> >
> > I just forgot the commands used in Xterm window to create a rescue/boot
> > disk. Could anybody throw me some light.
> >
>
> One alternative might be to use Tom's boot disk for rescue operations.
> Tot
Stephen Liu wrote:
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I just forgot the commands used in Xterm window to create a rescue/boot
> disk. Could anybody throw me some light.
>
One alternative might be to use Tom's boot disk for rescue operations.
Totally self-contained and easily used.
I don't remember whe
Mmm, I just went there and there is nothing to download and the link for
anonymous ftp
produces an error. Is there actually something to download yet. I notice
Linuxcare's Business Card
can be downloaded and appears to do the same thing.
Gary
"Steven W. Orr" wrote:
> Your best best bet is the l
Your best best bet is the lubbock project stored on sourceforge. It's a
50M emergency bootable cd image.
My opinion, emergency root boot floppy sets are problematic. The boot
floppy is no problem. The root floppy is very hard.
--
-Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. [EMAIL PROT
er, oops
ayup
mkbootdisk
sorry
eric
- Original Message -
From: "John Aldrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: Commands to create a rescue/boot disk
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Eric Clover wrote:
>
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Eric Clover wrote:
> bootdisk
> or
> man bootdisk
>
You mean MKbootdisk. :-)
John
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
I believe that's mkbootdisk
-->bootdisk
-->or
-->man bootdisk
-->
-->Stephen Liu wrote:
-->>
-->> Hi Everybody,
-->>
-->> I just forgot the commands used in Xterm window to create
-->a rescue/boot
-->> disk. Could anybody throw me some light.
-->>
-->> Thanks in advance.
-->>
-->> B.R.
-->
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Stephen Liu wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I just forgot the commands used in Xterm window to create a rescue/boot
> disk. Could anybody throw me some light.
>
man mkbootdisk. Just remember, you DON'T need to prepend the
"vmlinuz-" stuff to it I can never seem to remember t
bootdisk
or
man bootdisk
Stephen Liu wrote:
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I just forgot the commands used in Xterm window to create a rescue/boot
> disk. Could anybody throw me some light.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> B.R.
> Stephen
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
You might already have the answer to this, but check the .bashrc file and
you will find that an alias has been setup with the -i option. No doubt to
protect us newbies.. :)
Cya,
Pete
--
> From: Jim Kannengieser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: commands without co
>Hi. I'm new to Linux, having just installed Red Hat 5.0 on my system >last
>weekend, but I'm not new to Unix. I was surprised to find that many
>commands ask for confirmations, particularly rm. I took a look at the >man,
>but couldn't find a flag to turn confirmations off. Anyone have a
>suggesti
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Jim Kannengieser wrote:
> Hi. I'm new to Linux, having just installed Red Hat 5.0 on my system last
> weekend, but I'm not new to Unix. I was surprised to find that many
> commands ask for confirmations, particularly rm. I took a look at the man,
This is a Redhatism, and I co
Define some of the following aliases in your /etc/bashrc
alias cp='cp -iv'
alias mv='mv -i'
alias rm='rm -i'
Jim Kannengieser wrote:
>
> Hi. I'm new to Linux, having just installed Red Hat 5.0 on my system last
> weekend, but I'm not new to Unix. I was surprised to find that many
> commands a
> Hi. I'm new to Linux, having just installed Red Hat 5.0 on my system last
> weekend, but I'm not new to Unix. I was surprised to find that many
> commands ask for confirmations, particularly rm. I took a look at the man,
> but couldn't find a flag to turn confirmations off. Anyone have a
> sugge
23 matches
Mail list logo
