- for one machine.
If you want more than one entitlements then you have to pay.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Mike
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Nick Lindsell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March
k" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: Web Browser
> Mike,
> It sounds like you clicked on the "RedHat" icon somewhere and cranked up
> RHN instead. The "browser" in a default RH install should
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Mike
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Nick Lindsell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 11:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Web Browser
>
>
> > On Sat, 2003-03-22 at
On 22-Mar-2003/11:13 -0500, Mike Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I thought RH was free - why would I have to pay for an entitlement? I'm new
>to RH/Linux so, I kind of don't understand if the software is free - why
>would I need to pay for an entitlement ...
This is why I advocate replying *
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 11:13:46AM -0500, Mike Taggart wrote:
> I thought RH was free - why would I have to pay for an entitlement? I'm new
> to RH/Linux so, I kind of don't understand if the software is free - why
> would I need to pay for an entitlement ...
Once you get your browser working, vi
ndsell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: Web Browser
> On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 15:54, Mike Taggart wrote:
> > I'm a little confused, I installed RH8 server and when I click on the
Web
> > Browser Icon - no
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 10:54:39 -0500
"Mike Taggart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a little confused, I installed RH8 server and when I click on the
> Web Browser Icon - nothing happens. Also if I try to run RHN I
> receive Error Message 31 ... something about I need an Entitlement in
> order for
On Sî, 2003-03-22 at 17:54, Mike Taggart wrote:
> I'm a little confused, I installed RH8 server and when I click on the Web
> Browser Icon - nothing happens.
please open a terminal ( System Tools -> Terminal ) and type
mozilla
What's the output? If command is not found, you need to install mozilla
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 15:54, Mike Taggart wrote:
> I'm a little confused, I installed RH8 server and when I click on the Web
> Browser Icon - nothing happens.
What happens when you run mozilla from a terminal window?
Also if I try to run RHN I receive Error
> Message 31 ... something about I ne
Mark,
We recently purchased a 700Mhz Celeron running WinME and had the same
trouble - the thing would shut down and reboot with no warning in the
middle of a program. I'm currently running Mozilla with 6.1 on an
AMD-k6-2/500 and am very happy with it. The only glitch I've run into is
that I can
I did check the glibc version, it is the required version.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew M Edgerton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: web browser NS6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
What glibc are you running
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
What glibc are you running? I think this requires glibc 2.1.2 or
higher.
> [root@mail netscape]#./netscape
>
> ZILLA_FIVE_HOME=.
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.:./Cool
> LIBPATH=.:./Cool
>SHLIB_PATH=.:./Cool
> XPCS_HOME=./Cool
> MOZ_PROGRA
Gentlemen, any suggestions ?
-Original Message-
From: Shanmuga Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 9:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: web browser NS6
I have installed NS6 from a new download. when I run ./netscape, I get the
following error
Gentlemen, any suggestions ?
-Original Message-
From: Shanmuga Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 9:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: web browser NS6
I have installed NS6 from a new download. when I run ./netscape, I get the
following error
Gentlemen, any suggestions ?
-Original Message-
From: Shanmuga Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 9:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: web browser NS6
I have installed NS6 from a new download. when I run ./netscape, I get the
following error
I have installed NS6 from a new download. when I run ./netscape, I get the
following error messges. Can any on help me to understand whats going wrong
here.
[root@mail netscape]#./netscape
ZILLA_FIVE_HOME=.
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.:./Cool
LIBPATH=.:./Cool
SHLIB_PATH=.:./Cool
XP
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 06:23:14PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> Here on my machine it seems to mean danger for the whole LINUX when
> running Netscape: if I do not check memory and swap every 5 minutes or so
> when Netscape is on, it has happened that either of them must have been
> *(1) s
Reply to message from Jack Bowling on Mon, 27 Nov 2000, 11:11 <-0800>:
> ** Reply to message from Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 27
> Nov 2000 18:23:14 +0100 (CET)
>
>
>
> > *(1) = I only can assume it's been memory and swap being full: in such a
> > situation it was impossible
** Reply to message from Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 27
Nov 2000 18:23:14 +0100 (CET)
> *(1) = I only can assume it's been memory and swap being full: in such a
> situation it was impossible to check them -- but IIRC from situations when
> running Netscape: the whole system be
Reply to message from Wolfgang Pfeiffer on Mon, 27 Nov 2000, 19:28 <+0100>:
> Reply to message from Charles Galpin on Mon, 27 Nov 2000, 12:44 <-0500>:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> >
> > > [ ... ]
> >
> > press 'q' to exit lynx. By default it will ask you if y
Reply to message from Charles Galpin on Mon, 27 Nov 2000, 12:44 <-0500>:
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> > But I just set up Pine a week ago or so: nice colors, customization
> > possibilities are -- as far as I can see -- great, and it's much livelier
> > and quicker t
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> But I just set up Pine a week ago or so: nice colors, customization
> possibilities are -- as far as I can see -- great, and it's much livelier
> and quicker than Messenger is .. IIRC the only problem I had with Pine,
> was when I opened lynx from
Reply to message from Statux on Sat, 25 Nov 2000, 17:53 <-0500>:
> [ ... ]
>
> I've found Mozilla and pre-releases of NS6 (and from what I actually have
> seen of NS6 so far) to be slow. There's something java-driven about the
> whole thing. Like, NS4 etc uses whatever it uses and it's fast. The
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:50:01PM -0800, Thornton Prime wrote:
> [...]
> but the more recent daily snapshots of
> Mozilla have been, for the most part, as stable or more stable than
> Netscape 4.7x.
Hm, that's not exactly an achievement, given NS 4.7x's buggyness... :-}
SCNR,
Thomas
--
the Linux version on the website when it is almost impossible to finish
complete download?
CH
-Original Message-
From: Shanmuga Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, November 26, 2000 6:24 PM
Subject: RE: web browser
>Statux:
a
snapshot of the error messages.
-Original Message-
From: Statux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 5:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: web browser
After much headache getting it downloaded, it finally downloaded and
installed but missed a package (I
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 10:39:18PM -0800, Mark Ivey wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Thornton Prime wrote:
>
> > I'd actually strongly recommend a daily snapshot of Mozilla instead. I
> > found Netscape 6 buggy and bloated, but the more recent daily snapshots of
> > Mozilla have been, for the most p
>I was just wondering, is Mozilla ever going to become faster (i.e. will
>the final release be optimized?) On my machine, it is much much slower
>than Netscape 4.7x. Plus it has a bad habit of simply quitting with no
>warnings or messages. Does it behave like this for anyone else? Am I
>doing s
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Thornton Prime wrote:
> I'd actually strongly recommend a daily snapshot of Mozilla instead. I
> found Netscape 6 buggy and bloated, but the more recent daily snapshots of
> Mozilla have been, for the most part, as stable or more stable than
> Netscape 4.7x.
I was just wonde
Hmmm...
Netscape 6 installed flawlessly for me and seems, at least for now, to
be faster and *less* buggy than the previous 4.x version. Not only
that, the fonts seem to be well behaved and managable.
Thornton Prime wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Vidiot wrote:
>
>
>>> Netscapes's version
>I'd actually strongly recommend a daily snapshot of Mozilla instead. I
>found Netscape 6 buggy and bloated, but the more recent daily snapshots of
>Mozilla have been, for the most part, as stable or more stable than
>Netscape 4.7x.
>thornton
I only ever download the daily snapshots.
MB
--
e-ma
After much headache getting it downloaded, it finally downloaded and
installed but missed a package (I don't know which one).. the setup
process that followed was slow and annoying and isn't very navigable (you
get stuck on one page and you can't go back and fix mistakes). When you do
make a mista
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:50:01PM -0800, Thornton Prime wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Vidiot wrote:
>
> I'd actually strongly recommend a daily snapshot of Mozilla instead. I
> found Netscape 6 buggy and bloated, but the more recent daily snapshots of
> Mozilla have been, for the most part, as s
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Vidiot wrote:
> >Netscapes's version 6 rocks...just loaded it on RH-7
>
> I'll try downloading it again, as the previous few compiles refused to
> run as a user.
I'd actually strongly recommend a daily snapshot of Mozilla instead. I
found Netscape 6 buggy and bloated, but th
>Netscapes's version 6 rocks...just loaded it on RH-7
I'll try downloading it again, as the previous few compiles refused to
run as a user.
MB
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bart: Hey, why is it destroying other toys? Lisa: They must have
programmed it to eliminate the competition. Bart
Netscapes's version 6 rocks...just loaded it on RH-7
Vidiot wrote:
>> If you want a full-featured browser (most of the included browsers like
>> the one in KDE aren't complete yet), then I suggest looking at Opera.
>>
>> You can get a copy from www.opera.com. I run that or NetScape, mostly
>> O
>If you want a full-featured browser (most of the included browsers like
>the one in KDE aren't complete yet), then I suggest looking at Opera.
>
>You can get a copy from www.opera.com. I run that or NetScape, mostly
>Opera as it's far faster and much more reliable.
I downloaded a copy and then l
2000 7:29 PM
To: Shanmuga Raj
Subject: Re: web browser
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 09:50:04AM +, kevin wrote:
[...]
> The KDE explorer is fine if I'm doing lookups on Linux documentation and
> stuff, but not complete enough for browsing proper.
[...]
Apparently, you haven't tried KD
Viernes, 24 de Noviembre de 2000 03:25 a.m.
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Re: web browser
>
>
> On Friday 24 November 2000 10:11, you wrote:
> > Is Netscape the only web browser available for Linux, or is
> there any other
> > option ?
> >
> The other o
i usually use lynx coz i don't usually need the graphics. makes browsing a
lot faster : ).
bobby
> Is Netscape the only web browser available for Linux, or is there any
other
> option ?
>
> Thx
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 09:50:04AM +, kevin wrote:
[...]
> The KDE explorer is fine if I'm doing lookups on Linux documentation and
> stuff, but not complete enough for browsing proper.
[...]
Apparently, you haven't tried KDE 2.0's browser "konqueror" yet -
Javascript support (not sure whethe
Shanmuga Raj¡A§A¦n¡I
Another good browser is Opera.
Regards,
Michael
¦b 2000/11/24 PM 04:11:00 §A¼g¹D¡R
>Is Netscape the only web browser available for Linux, or is there any other
>option ?
>
>Thx
>
>
>
>___
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECT
If you want a full-featured browser (most of the included browsers like
the one in KDE aren't complete yet), then I suggest looking at Opera.
You can get a copy from www.opera.com. I run that or NetScape, mostly
Opera as it's far faster and much more reliable.
The KDE explorer is fine if I'm doi
On Friday 24 November 2000 10:11, you wrote:
> Is Netscape the only web browser available for Linux, or is there any other
> option ?
>
The other options that come to mind now are :
lynx (the one and only ;), mozilla (it's quite stable for me now..still quite
heavy), amaya, opera (second beta jus
44 matches
Mail list logo
