Hi,
I have managed to install RedHat 7.1 on a i386 machine with 16mb ram.
I installed redhat on a hardisk on a different machine , then upgraded the
kernel to its i386 rpm which has got math co-processor enabled. After that
I took the hardisk and put it on the i386 machine. And it worked!!
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:06:31PM +0100, Bastiaan Welmers wrote:
> Van: "Thomas Ribbrock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oh! Moet ik nu in het Nederlands schrijven? ;-)
> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 06:08:23PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:
> > 6.2 is still maintained, I thought? I have 6.2 running on a 486DX2/66 l
Don't give up on the 386. There are several minimalist Linux web sites
out there from which you can get some solid advice. Also, you don't have
to stick with Red Hat. Look for an older slackware installation set that
you can download to floppies. There are hundreds of different
distributions ou
Hi,
I have managed to install RedHat 7.1 on a i386 machine with 16mb ram.
I installed redhat on a hardisk on a different machine , then upgraded the
kernel to its i386 rpm which has got math co-processor enabled. After that
I took the hardisk and put it on the i386 machine. And it worked!!
Van: "Thomas Ribbrock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 06:08:23PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:
> [...]
> > There is *no* safe version of Red Hat Linux that can be installed on a
> > 386 with 8MB Ram. All versions that old have serious security holes.
>
> 6.2 is still maintained, I though
Van: "Bret Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As an added data point, I just completed an upgrade to 7.3 on my home
> firewall box a IBM P90 with 32mb. Text mode install went fine. I can't
> imagine running ANYTHING less than 16MB and not sure how you would get
> it installed other than one of the m
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>
> There is *no* safe version of Red Hat Linux that can be installed on a
> 386 with 8MB Ram. All versions that old have serious security holes.
Allright, that's a reason when the computer is 24h a day connected with Internet
but I also want to use RH Linux on
Van: "fred smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Even 7.x, which may run on a 386 will be severely starved for
> resources on an 8-meg machine. Red Hat's installer likely won't have
> a chance of running on 8 megs, not even in text mode. You may wish
> to look up the "rule" project, they have an install
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 06:08:23PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:
[...]
> There is *no* safe version of Red Hat Linux that can be installed on a
> 386 with 8MB Ram. All versions that old have serious security holes.
6.2 is still maintained, I thought? I have 6.2 running on a 486DX2/66 laptop
with 8MB. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 29 November 2002 12:36 am, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 18:08, Ed Wilts wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 09:12:39PM +0100, Bastiaan Welmers wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Does anyone know where I can find the system requirements
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 18:08, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 09:12:39PM +0100, Bastiaan Welmers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone know where I can find the system requirements / advised system
> > properties
> > for any release of RedHat Linux? For example, until which version can I ins
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 09:12:39PM +0100, Bastiaan Welmers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know where I can find the system requirements / advised system
> properties
> for any release of RedHat Linux? For example, until which version can I install
> on
> an i386 8MB Ram?
Actually, the requirements
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 09:12:39PM +0100, Bastiaan Welmers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know where I can find the system requirements / advised system
> properties
> for any release of RedHat Linux? For example, until which version can I install
> on
> an i386 8MB Ram? Now I'm using 5.2 but it jus
13 matches
Mail list logo
