Nope, the DIR_COLORS are as they should be at default :(
sub
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Listmail,
>
> > The link will blink red. If i open temp.lnk, all the contents from
> > temp.txt are properly displayed...
>
> Maybe some joker friend messed wit
Hi Listmail,
> The link will blink red. If i open temp.lnk, all the contents from
> temp.txt are properly displayed...
Maybe some joker friend messed with your DIR_COLORS?
Bye,
Leonard.
I am not certain if this is the problem or not. I have my drive split into
3 partitions. One is mounted as /home, and another as /var. However
everything is mounted and working properly, and the links appear to be
borken no matter where they are.
For example if I create a file say
temp.txt
the
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 12:36:18PM -0700, listmail wrote:
> On my Redhat 6.2 server all of my symbolic links are blinking red
> as if they are broken, but they seeom to otherwise be working normally.
> Any idea what might be causing this?
Have you tried to follow these links? I.e. have you
The color sequence prolly got flipped to where what used to be bad links
is now good links :)
Us Linux people are spoiled with our colorized ls... FreeBSD people, etc,
don't get pretty colors :P
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, listmail wrote:
> On my Redhat 6.2 server all of my symbolic links are bli
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 12:36:18PM -0700, listmail wrote:
| as if they are broken, but they seeom to otherwise be working normally.
| Any idea what might be causing this?
| sub
That's incredibly vague. Got a transcript of what is actually going wrong?
--
Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PRO
I've had this happen - I'll try to give you a layman's best guess answer:
If the kernel interprets the path you are linking to as an invalid one
then you will get the red blinking, even if it works. For example, I run
ProFTPD on a server I have that hosts web sites. For security purposes I
chro
