respond to redhat-list
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Swap Limits
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It is my understanding that swap partitions are limited in size to 2GB,
Perhaps. File system limits go beyond that, now. Whether or not thi
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It is my understanding that swap partitions are limited in size to 2GB,
Perhaps. File system limits go beyond that, now. Whether or not this still
applies to swap partitions is kind of murky, but it shouldn't apply to
swap *files*.
I'm not sure th
Title: RE: Swap Limits
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It is my understanding that swap partitions are limited in size to
> 2GB, yet Red Hat's documentation points that your swap partition
> should be 2x the size of your physical memory. Therefore, if you
> have a 2GB + of RAM,
> It is my understanding that swap partitions are limited in size to 2GB,
> yet Red Hat's documentation points that your swap partition should be 2x
> the size of your physical memory. Therefore, if you have a 2GB + of RAM,
> what is the best approach for sizing your swap partition? Using multipl
YES, that is what you can do.
raymundo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is my understanding that swap partitions are limited in size to 2GB,
yet Red Hat's documentation points that your swap partition should be 2x
the size of your physical memory. Therefore, if you have a 2GB + of RAM,
what is t
