Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Art Ross wrote:
>
> > Well I did a check and found that glibc-devel was also installed. Why don't I
> > give you some more accurate information. I've attached a log of the make
> > process. Maybe this will give you some ideas.
>
> Well, from your
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Art Ross wrote:
> Well I did a check and found that glibc-devel was also installed. Why don't I
> give you some more accurate information. I've attached a log of the make
> process. Maybe this will give you some ideas.
Well, from your output it really looks like the ker
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Art Ross wrote:
>
> > Gordon,
> > I did an rpm -q kernel-headers and this package is installed. Do you have
> > any other ideas? Thanks for your insight.
> > Best Regards,
> > Art
>
> The only other package that should have a required "socket.h
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Art Ross wrote:
> Gordon,
> I did an rpm -q kernel-headers and this package is installed. Do you have
> any other ideas? Thanks for your insight.
> Best Regards,
> Art
The only other package that should have a required "socket.h" is
glibc-devel.
--
If I had a doll
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Art Ross wrote:
>
> > When I repeated this process on another RH6.2 box on the home network,
> > (Originally was a canned Gnome install for RH6.0 with a RH6.2 upgrade) I
> > encountered some problems with the 'make' step. There were some
> > difficult
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Art Ross wrote:
> When I repeated this process on another RH6.2 box on the home network,
> (Originally was a canned Gnome install for RH6.0 with a RH6.2 upgrade) I
> encountered some problems with the 'make' step. There were some
> difficults with finding 'socket.h'. My hun
