On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 06:50:24AM -0400, Ben Logan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 06:22:48AM -0400, Ben Logan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 10:16:36AM +0100, Nick Lindsell wrote:
> > > Only one way to find out -- try it.
> > > Alas the oldest box I have is 7.2 so can't help you much there.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 06:22:48AM -0400, Ben Logan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 10:16:36AM +0100, Nick Lindsell wrote:
> > Only one way to find out -- try it.
> > Alas the oldest box I have is 7.2 so can't help you much there.
Just wanted to let you know that I tried recompiling with gcc aga
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 10:16:36AM +0100, Nick Lindsell wrote:
> Only one way to find out -- try it.
> Alas the oldest box I have is 7.2 so can't help you much there.
I tried it (compiling with kgcc--egcs-2.91.66) this morning, and
here's what I got (this is after successfully running make
mrprop
At 22:35 29/07/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 04:56:29PM +0100, Nick Lindsell wrote:
> > OK, fine - I was just trying to point out that there are two compilers on
> > a rh7.2 box (which many folks are unaware of).
> >
> > But how about trying to use kgcc? It might be the fix and e
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 04:56:29PM +0100, Nick Lindsell wrote:
> OK, fine - I was just trying to point out that there are two compilers on
> a rh7.2 box (which many folks are unaware of).
>
> But how about trying to use kgcc? It might be the fix and every time I've
> come across this parse error
At 11:12 29/07/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 01:15:49PM +0100, Nick Lindsell wrote:
> > At 07:24 29/07/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > >I don't understand how that could be my problem because I just
> > >successfully compiled the kernel with the same compiler (gcc-2.96-85)
> > >I'm us
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 01:15:49PM +0100, Nick Lindsell wrote:
> At 07:24 29/07/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> >I don't understand how that could be my problem because I just
> >successfully compiled the kernel with the same compiler (gcc-2.96-85)
> >I'm using to compile lm_sensors.
>
> Not quite. On l
At 07:24 29/07/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Here's the response I got from the lm_sensors folks:
>
>"You must have some incompatibility between your kernel headers and
>your gcc or libc headers.
>
>"Sorry, it will be quite difficult for us to diagnose it for you.
>
>"If you figure it out email us, ref
