Network problemsHi List
I upgraded to Linux 7.3 from 7.2 and I installed samba but when I
try to connect to samba it gives me a network path error network not found
after following the technical pages for samba it appears that samba works
fine on the local machine but not from a windows m
Hi again.
My problem seemed to be that I put the 'alias eth0 3c509' at
the end of the last line in the file. Anyway, in a new line,
I tried 3c59x but it didn't work so I changed it back to
3c509 and it worked!!
Thanks guys, I knew you would help me in some way or another
:)
Ragnar W.
___
The problem is that 3c905 isn't the module name.
Try "alias eth0 3c59x" and try again.
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Ragnar Wiencke wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> I just installed RH 7.2 on a machine. I has a 3c509 Nic
> installed. But it doesn't get up and running upon booting
> unless I do 'modprobe 3c509'.
>
Wiencke wrote:
>
> Hi guys.
>
> I just installed RH 7.2 on a machine. I has a 3c509 Nic
> installed. But it doesn't get up and running upon booting
> unless I do 'modprobe 3c509'.
>
> 'ONBOOT=yes' is in
> '/etc/sysconfig/network-script/ifcfg-eth0'
>
> I put 'alias eth0 3c509' in '/etc/modules.
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Vidiot wrote:
> >On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
> >> in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
> >>
> >> ONBOOT="yes"
> >>
> >Thanks... I wonder how that got changed... *shrug* Oh,
> >well.. it's fixed now! :-) (Note -- as a fix I had put the
> >following line
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
> It didn't work because that shoudl be two lines
>
> echo "activating eth0"
> /sbin/ifconfig eth0 up
>
>
> But, the ONBOOT parameter is better. Also, ifup eth0 is shorter to type :)
>
Ahh... well, I hadn't had a chance to try it yet... :-)
I'll take
Hi,
I just wanted to clarify one tiny thing for lurking newbies.
There is a difference between `ifup' and `ifconfig' commands.
`ifup' is a shell script that enables some extra paramators and
interface configurations that are generated by linuxconf,
netconf, or netcfg. You will find within the
>On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
>> in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
>>
>> ONBOOT="yes"
>>
>Thanks... I wonder how that got changed... *shrug* Oh,
>well.. it's fixed now! :-) (Note -- as a fix I had put the
>following line in my /etc/rc.d/rc.local file:
>echo "activating e
It didn't work because that shoudl be two lines
echo "activating eth0"
/sbin/ifconfig eth0 up
But, the ONBOOT parameter is better. Also, ifup eth0 is shorter to type :)
charles
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
> > in /etc/sysconfig/network
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
> in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
>
> ONBOOT="yes"
>
Thanks... I wonder how that got changed... *shrug* Oh,
well.. it's fixed now! :-) (Note -- as a fix I had put the
following line in my /etc/rc.d/rc.local file:
echo "activating eth0" /sbi
in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
ONBOOT="yes"
charles
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, John Aldrich wrote:
> I've got a RedHat 6.2 box here and for some strange reason,
> when the machine gets rebooted (whether by me or by some
> other reason -- power problems, etc) it inactivates the
> eth0
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Jason N. Price wrote:
> I guess I hadn't saved the default gateway setting in
> linuxconf. Regardless, that wasn't the problem. I changed it and it
> didn't help... :(
>
> Here's my route output:
>
> Destination Gateway GenmaskFlMet Ref U
At 05:32 PM 8/24/00 -0500, Jason N. Price wrote:
>Also, any thoughts on how I can share the net connection? As mentioned
>previously, Win98 std. doesn't have net sharing included.
Dont remember the details of your setup - do you want to route traffic thru
your win98 system? Try www.nat32.com
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Jason N. Price wrote:
>
> As for the nameserver, I don't have an IP for the one I use. I have DNS
> disabled in my TCP/IP settings. Can I use my windows box as the DNS by chance?
>
I wouldn't use the Win98 box as dns, but you should be able to find out
what it's using a
So... Maybe winproxy
www.winproxy.com or something?
-Dusty
- Original Message -
From: Jason N. Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: Network problems
> Okay, I can't even begin to tell you how stupid I feel rig
Okay, I can't even begin to tell you how stupid I feel right now. I almost
want to make up some fix that I had to apply to get this to work. Turns
out, I mistyped the IP address for my Windows box. I had it set to
192.160.0.1. Doh! Feel free to call me whatever names you can come up
with.
Um - yeah. Your problem is that you can't see 192.168.0.1 from .2, and/or vice-versa;
not gateway problems. Sorry for misleading you!
And the resolv.conf file - "man resolver" says that a line starting with "nameserver"
should give the ip address immediately after it - so if the nameserver you
I guess I hadn't saved the default gateway setting in
linuxconf. Regardless, that wasn't the problem. I changed it and it
didn't help... :(
Here's my route output:
Destination Gateway GenmaskFlMet Ref Use Iface
192.168.0.2# 255.255.255.2
You might see what /sbin/route gives you ... although I tried this on a box at work
and the command doesn't exist. So I must have something on my home machine that I
don't have at work. If the route command works, you can check your gateway that way -
your gateway should show up as a line label
Yes, I am sure the eth0 interface is up and running. When I do a 'ifconfig' it shows
up with the
proper IP, etc. I will attempt to ping the loopback when I get home. As for the
webpage, I don't
have Apache installed on the linux box yet, I was waiting to get the networking up
first. Unless
Yes, the physical network is working. I have a triple boot on this system
(Win98/Win2k/RH6.0) and
the LAN works fine in both Win98 and Win2k. So, hardware-wise I should be fine. I am
unable to
ping either way using either the IP or the boxname.
Speaking of boxname, how do I name the linux bo
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am a new redhat/linux user, so please excuse my ignorance. :)
>
> I'm trying to setup a home LAN with my Win98 box housing the internet connection,
>and the Linux
> box (RH 6.0) having access to the internet and housing a web and email server.
I know this sounds obvious - but is the physical network working? Do you have link
lights on your network cards on?
Then - the hosts file in Windows is in C:\WINDOWS\hosts - no extension, just hosts.
Probably not one there already.
You can't ping either box from either box? Using ping or ping
I do not have a hosts file setup on the windows box. Where would I put it? I did not
realize
windows knew how to use a hosts file... :)
Yes, networking it started. I'm not at home right now, but I have run ifconfig and it
showed both
the 'eth0' and 'lo' interfaces.
I am not familiar with h
Hi,
Do you have your hosts file set up on both the
windows and Linux box?
Do you have networking actually started on the
Linux Box? (/sbin/ifconfig should give you information)
Do you have anything in hosts.deny that would
cause trouble?
Just some things to check.
Linda Hanigan
25 matches
Mail list logo
