On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Ditesh wrote:
> > I don't have any good ideas so far, and you should get a different
> > error message if you don't have a partition 1. I normaly see that error
> > message when you don't have a module loaded that you need to access the
> > device.
>
> I recompiled the kern
> I don't have any good ideas so far, and you should get a different
> error message if you don't have a partition 1. I normaly see that error
> message when you don't have a module loaded that you need to access the
> device.
I recompiled the kernel with all the fat/vfat/msdos/advanced partit
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Lorris J. Woods wrote:
> I believe you have overwritten your /etc/fstab; I don't remember the exact
> format, but you need to have an entry for /dev/hda1 in there.
>
No, you do not need an entry in /etc/fstab when you give the device to
mount. You only need the entry when you
I believe you have overwritten your /etc/fstab; I don't remember the exact
format, but you need to have an entry for /dev/hda1 in there.
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Ditesh wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have had trouble mounting my windows partition after compiling 2.4.x.
> Reverting back to the old kernel
