RE: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote: >I think the solution would be to get OpenMail to go opensource. Not likely. In the first place, there's probably Microsoft code in there somewhere, and they are *not* going to release that code as

RE: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

Title: RE: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange I think the solution would be to get OpenMail to go opensource. -Devon -Original Message- From: Anthony E. Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:33 PM To: '[

RE: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

d Exchange2000 server (not 5.5) AND the Exchange web access piece. HTH. -Original Message- From: Go, Jeffrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:16 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

RE: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 11:15, Go, Jeffrey wrote: > hi guys.. > > in addition to this thread, and I am sorry if this has been answered already > > but is there a linux plugin that can be used as an Outlook client to connect > to an Exchange server? > There are few options here. The best, that I

RE: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange yes, but you need a an Exchange Serverthat defeats the purpose of an alternative. - Original Message - From: "daniel&quo

Re: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

. ghandi, what do you think of western civilization?" > "i think it would be a good idea." > - reporter to mahatma ghandi > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

k it would be a good idea." - reporter to mahatma ghandi - Original Message - From: "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:32 AM Subject: RE: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux vers

Re: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

well, is therE? - Original Message - From: "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:32 PM Subject: RE: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

RE: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Carter, Shaun G wrote: >I may be wrong but I thought that Ximian's Evolution had a plugin that >could be used to serve and communicate with exchange shared calanders? He's using Outlook clients. He needs a server solution for the

Re: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 10/04/2002 at 11:25 AM Grant Nygren [EMAIL PROTECTED] [gregausit/redhat-list] wrote: >This is a little off the topic, but since I can't find anyone else (even >the Outlook expert at Microsoft) who can answer this question, I came to >where the real

RE: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

bject: Re: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:25:23AM -0400, Grant Nygren wrote: > > Is there a cheaper alternative, that can be done with a Linux based server. > and Windows clients running Outlook? PHPGroupWare was a se

Re: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Grant Nygren wrote: >I have a client who is a Talent Agency... 10-15 Agents and over 200 >Clients. These agents need to be able to access calenders for any client >and make changes. Take a look at PHPGroupware . Tony -- Anthony E. Greene

Re: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:25:23AM -0400, Grant Nygren wrote: > > Is there a cheaper alternative, that can be done with a Linux based server. > and Windows clients running Outlook? PHPGroupWare was a set of PHP files that allowed this and lots of other stuff using Mysql. It's been a while since

Re: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Grant Nygren wrote: >This is a little off the topic, but since I can't find anyone else (even >the Outlook expert at Microsoft) who can answer this question, I came to >where the real brains are. > >Is there a cheaper alternative, that can be done

RE: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

Grant Nygren > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 04:25 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS > Exchange > > > This is a little off the topic, but since I can't find anyone else (even > the Outlook expert at Mi

Is there a Linux solution for this? Was Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

This is a little off the topic, but since I can't find anyone else (even the Outlook expert at Microsoft) who can answer this question, I came to where the real brains are. I have a client who is a Talent Agency... 10-15 Agents and over 200 Clients. These agents need to be able to access calen

Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 01:11, Mike Burger wrote: > Openmail...that's what I was thinking of. > > Did they really sell it off? > It would have helped if I had included the website address in my other e-mail. :-/ http://www.samsungcontact.com/en/ Regards, Jim H ___

Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 01:11, Mike Burger wrote: > Openmail...that's what I was thinking of. > > Did they really sell it off? > Yes they sold the rights to Samsung SDS. They are now producing their own product based on Openmail. They are calling it Samsung Contact. There isn't much information o

Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Mike Burger wrote: >Openmail...that's what I was thinking of. > >Did they really sell it off? That's what I remember reading somewhere. An HP sales rep should be able to tell you. Tony - -- Anthony E. Greene

Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

Openmail...that's what I was thinking of. Did they really sell it off? On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Rhugga wrote: > >I have heard rumors of a third-party server that is functionally > >equivalent to MS E

Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

No...HP has/had a product that they used to tout as a replacement for Exchange, that utilized the MAPI protocol for use with Outlook. Microsoft exerted some sort of pressure, and HP began phasing out the product...and won't release it to open source so that someone else can pick up where they

Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

you might be looking for "ximian connector" www.ximian.com/products/connector/ _ daniel a. g. quinn starving programmer freedom is the last, best hope of earth. - abraham lincoln - Original Message - From: "Rhugga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PRO

Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Rhugga wrote: >I have heard rumors of a third-party server that is functionally >equivalent to MS Exchange and allows seamless intergration with existing >outlook clients. Does anyone know anything about this? (this is like a >m

Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rhugga wrote: >I have heard rumors of a third-party server that is functionally >equivalent to MS Exchange and allows seamless intergration with existing >outlook clients. Does anyone know anything about this? (this is like a >major pipe dream but

Re: Linux version of MS Exchange

> From: Rhugga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I have heard rumors of a third-party server that is functionally > equivalent to MS Exchange and allows seamless intergration with existing > outlook clients. Does anyone know anything about this? (this is like a > major pipe dream but just thought I w