"Benjamin J. Weiss" a écrit :
>
> > I need to open the 8901, 4446 and ports for my installation. I
> > cannot find anything about this on the Red Hat documentation pages
>
> You need to adjust the rules for your iptables. There's a gui way (the
> command for which I can't remember, since
> I need to open the 8901, 4446 and ports for my installation. I
> cannot find anything about this on the Red Hat documentation pages
You need to adjust the rules for your iptables. There's a gui way (the
command for which I can't remember, since I never use it) and a text
way. You can, as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Dave Wreski wrote:
>The list is pretty much dead. We've picked up where they've left off, over
>at linuxsecurity.com:
Thank you very kindly.
- -d
- --
David Talkington
http://www.spotnet.org
PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/dt000823.asc
-BEGI
> I get no mail at all on the linux-securiy list, though the signup page
> says I'm subscribed (and have been for a year or so). Is there
> something wrong on my end, or is that list dormant?
The list is pretty much dead. We've picked up where they've left off, over
at linuxsecurity.com:
Linux
Hi David,
> I get no mail at all on the linux-securiy list, though the signup page
> says I'm subscribed (and have been for a year or so). Is there
> something wrong on my end, or is that list dormant?
There is something wrong with that list. I haven't had any mail from it sinc
On 31-May-00 at 18:44:52 Alan Mead wrote:
> At 01:12 AM 5/31/00 , Krikofer wrote:
>>Hi. My friend had told me that Linux does not have a good
>>firewall. Linux can be broken into easily (according to his job's system
>>administrator). Would any of you know if this is true? He says his
>>fri
First of all I apologize for sending HTML email. I did not realize it. I
hope I send it right this time.
Second, thank you for all your replies. It makes sense that all OS's have
vulerabilities. Security depends alot on good written programs and the
System Administrators' knowledge, experienc
At 01:12 AM 5/31/00 , Krikofer wrote:
>Hi. My friend had told me that Linux does not have a good
>firewall. Linux can be broken into easily (according to his job's system
>administrator). Would any of you know if this is true? He says his
>friend likes Linux. Any facts?
>
>CH
This is a to
While no system is 100% secure, I've tweaked my linux system to the
point that most people simply give up when trying to break into my Linux
box. I run SAINT and nmape on a regular basis and check my logs
regularly. I've seen people port scan me and try all sorts of tricks to
get in. After a fe
There is a RedHat derivative that is supposed to be much better at
out-ot-the-box security configuration, called KRUD:
http://www.tummy.com/krud/
John Aldrich wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 May 2000, Krikofer wrote:
> >
> > Hi. My friend had told me that Linux does not have a good firewall. Linux can
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Krikofer wrote:
>
> Hi. My friend had told me that Linux does not have a good firewall. Linux can be
>broken into easily (according to his job's system administrator). Would any of you
>know if this is true? He says his friend likes Linux. Any facts?
>
> CH
>
--
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:12:31PM -0700, Krikofer wrote:
> Hi. My friend had told me that Linux does not have a good firewall. Linux can be
>broken into easily (according to his job's system administrator). Would any of you
>know if this is true? He says his friend likes Linux. Any facts?
At 23:12 2000-05-30 -0700, Krikofer wrote:
>Hi. My friend had told me that Linux does not have a good firewall.
>Linux can be broken into easily (according to his job's system
>administrator). Would any of you know if this is true? He says his
>friend likes Linux. Any facts?
The fact is that some
Krikofer,
Well, there is ipchains. It's free. It probably stops somewhere between
90 and 99.5% of all attacks. (I'm not a security expert.)
I know that there are commercial firewalls available, but I haven't
tried them. What people seem to ask for from ipchains, is to implement a
'statefull fire
Hi,
first: please don't post html-Emails to mailinglists. There are many users
here who works with email-clients that don't support that.
> Hi. My friend had told me that Linux does not have a good firewall.
> Linux can be broken into easily (according to his job's system
> administrator). W
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Mike Johnson wrote:
> At 03:04 PM 6/2/98 +0100, you wrote:
>
> >Are there any other people out there interested in a concerted linux
> >source security auditing process?
>
> Yes, yes, and yes. Did I mention, yes?
OK.
I've got a _lot_ of positive response about starting s
At 08:29 PM 6/2/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Yes there is a huge amount of need for some source of Info for security
>in Linux/Redhat Linux.
>
> -Carl Johnson
Just a small note, here. I would be terribly disapointed if the mailing
list was only for the Linux core (
Yes there is a huge amount of need for some source of Info for security in
Linux/Redhat Linux.
-Carl Johnson
--
From: Bench
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 1998 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [linux-security] Re: RedHat5.1
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Chris Evans wrote:
> If there is sufficient interest, I would envisage myself setting up a web
> page to indicate which packages could do with auditing, and also a mailing
> list for unmoderated discussion of auditing. The mailing list would be
> only for discussion of potenti
> Hi,
>
> I've got a lot of mail on the subject of security fixing and auditing.
>
> Are there any other people out there interested in a concerted linux
> source security auditing process?
>
> If there is sufficient interest, I would envisage myself setting up a web
> page to indicate which pa
At 03:04 PM 6/2/98 +0100, you wrote:
>Are there any other people out there interested in a concerted linux
>source security auditing process?
Yes, yes, and yes. Did I mention, yes?
>If there is sufficient interest, I would envisage myself setting up a web
>page to indicate which packages could
On Mon, 1 Jun 1998, Erik Troan wrote:
> Definitely! Thanks for putting this up, and for all of your work in finding
> these problems. I just send a note to the redhat-announce list with the
> first batch of fixes, and I'm off to work on more fixes now.
Hi,
I've got a lot of mail on the subject
22 matches
Mail list logo
