Re: Linux Routing

2003-07-08 Thread Rénald CASAGRAUDE
On mardi, juil 8, 2003, at 14:08 Europe/Paris, Luciano Rabelo wrote: Hi, Hi Luciano, Does anyone know where I can find information about Linux Routing. Take a look at : http://lartc.org/ R. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/r

Re: Linux Routing

2002-10-13 Thread Chris Watt
At 13:11 2002/10/08 -0400, you wrote: >Can someone please tell me the easiest way to route all traffic through a >RedHat Linux box. I would like to pass all data transparently from eth1 >(inside) to eth0 (outside) and vice versa. Actually the problem you have with documentation is probably a r

Re: Linux Routing

2002-10-13 Thread linux power
I dont think you can use bridge. I have tried it and didnt get it to work. So I ended up with NAT, MASQUERADE and iptables and are happy with that. --- Chris Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > At 13:11 2002/10/08 -0400, you wrote: > > >Can someone please tell me the easiest way to route > all t

Re: Linux Routing

2002-10-09 Thread Anthony Abby
Well the easiest way, perhaps, is simply to use Firestarter. It's a firewall application similiar to ZoneAlarm in the Windows world, but it does port forwarding and such. I use it for my Linux Firewall and it literally takes all of five minutes to set up. http://firestarter.sourceforge.net

Re: Linux Routing

2002-10-08 Thread juaid
From: Joshua P. Metcalf >Can someone please tell me the easiest way to route all traffic through a RedHat Linux box. I would like to pass all data >transparently from eth1 (inside) to eth0 (outside) and vice versa. just enable ip forwarding (look at /etc/sysctl.conf) and use ipchains or iptables

Re: Linux routing question

2001-02-25 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Frank Carreiro wrote: > I have setup a route on one of my linux boxes and have something > rather "unusual" happening. The box has a single nic in it. I'm > taking packets from my 192 network and moving them to my 172 network. > I can ping however it takes an unbelieable lo

Re: Linux routing question

2001-02-24 Thread Matthew Galgoci
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:14:11PM -0700, Frank Carreiro wrote: > I have setup a route on one of my linux boxes and have something rather > "unusual" happening. The box has a single nic in it. I'm taking > packets from my 192 network and moving them to my 172 network. I can > ping however it

Re: Linux routing question

2001-02-24 Thread David Brett
Now to the orginal problem. Do you have a DNS server on the network? If not this will delay response, but the response time should be normal david On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Michael Burger wrote: > It's called IP aliasing. > > ifconfig eth0 192.xxx.xxx.xxx > ifconfig eth0:0 172.xxx.xxx.xxx > >

Re: Linux routing question

2001-02-24 Thread David Brett
I was not aware this was possible in Linux david On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Statux wrote: > The NIC has multiple addresses, I take it. Of course, since we're dealing > with 2 hosts on one piece of equipment.. > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, David Brett wrote: > > > Hi Frank > > > > How are you moving pa

Re: Linux routing question

2001-02-24 Thread Michael Burger
It's called IP aliasing. ifconfig eth0 192.xxx.xxx.xxx ifconfig eth0:0 172.xxx.xxx.xxx On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:47:14 -0500 (EST), David Brett wrote: >Hi Frank > >How are you moving packets from network to another with one NIC? I think >I am missing something? > > >david > >On Fri, 23 Feb 2001,

Re: Linux routing question

2001-02-23 Thread Statux
The NIC has multiple addresses, I take it. Of course, since we're dealing with 2 hosts on one piece of equipment.. On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, David Brett wrote: > Hi Frank > > How are you moving packets from network to another with one NIC? I think > I am missing something? > > > david > > On Fri, 2

Re: Linux routing question

2001-02-23 Thread David Brett
Hi Frank How are you moving packets from network to another with one NIC? I think I am missing something? david On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Frank Carreiro wrote: > I have setup a route on one of my linux boxes and have something rather > "unusual" happening. The box has a single nic in it. I'm t

RE: Linux routing problem

2001-01-18 Thread Joel Lansden
Yes - there is - that's what's so weird - everything looks as though it should work... My ISP programmed this router w/ source & remote addresses, as well as assigning one of my new Useable IP's to the ethernet port on the router. The other IP was assigned to the "outside" NIC on my linux server.

Re: Linux routing problem

2001-01-18 Thread John Aldrich
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, you wrote: > Greetings all! > > I am having a problem with Redhat 6.2 routing the connection to my LAN. > > I was recently placed on what my ISP calls a "routed connection", rather > than a connection using a DSL modem. > > I was using my Linux box to monitor & log traffic,