David Mackay wrote:
Thanks for your response. The problem with that is
that 2.4.20 doesn't contain all the patches required
for my chipset. I can do back to a RH kernel like
2.4.20-8 and have PCMCIA but no USB, or compile 2.4.21
and get USB but no PCMCIA!
There must be a scripting/startup problem
Thanks for your response. The problem with that is
that 2.4.20 doesn't contain all the patches required
for my chipset. I can do back to a RH kernel like
2.4.20-8 and have PCMCIA but no USB, or compile 2.4.21
and get USB but no PCMCIA!
There must be a scripting/startup problem that i can
work arou
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 05:35, David Mackay wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I've got one of the dreaded Compaq Presario 900 Linux
> hating laptops. Unfortunatly the stock kernel locks up
> USB even 2.4.20-18 in RH9. Therfore you have to
> compile 2.4.21 with some patches to stand any chance.
> I have done thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09 Jul 2003 21:17:46 +0200, George Nicholls wrote:
> Many txs for the advice; I used mkinitrd to make a initial ramdisk. I
> used the command;
>
> /sbin/mkinitrd --fstab /boot/initrd-2.4.21.img 2.4.21 to create a file
> initrd-2.4.21.img
Read the
txs for the feeback:-)
I got the kernel up and running in the end. I became confused after the
"make modules_install" stage as the next stage, "make install", was not
recommended in the how-to from kernel.org. It recommended using mkinitrd
and copying the bzImage, config and other things to the /b
> default=0
> timeout=2
> splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
> title Pasco Linux (2.4.21)
> root (hd0,0)
> kernel /bzImage.pasco ro root=LABEL=/ hdc=ide-scsi
> initrd /initrd-2.4.21.img
> title Red Hat Linux (2.4.20-8)
> root (hd0,0)
> kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.20-8 ro root=LABEL=/
> hdc=ide-scsi
>
Many txs for the advice; I used mkinitrd to make a initial ramdisk. I
used the command;
/sbin/mkinitrd --fstab /boot/initrd-2.4.21.img 2.4.21 to create a file
initrd-2.4.21.img
When I rebooted to test the kernel, I got the following error;
Kernel panic: no init found. Try passing init= option to
Many txs for the advice; I used mkinitrd to make a initial ramdisk. I used the command;
/sbin/mkinitrd --fstab /boot/initrd-2.4.21.img 2.4.21 to create a file initrd-2.4.21.img
When I rebooted to test the kernel, I got the following error;
Kernel panic: no init found. Try passing init= optio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 17:35:22 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do you think that you could advise?
Yes.
> 11. Reboot and check new kernel is booting
>
>
> At this point the boot says booting Pasco Linux and stops with error 15:
> cannot find file
save your .config file in another directory (/tmp)
do a "make mrproper"
move your .config file back in /usr/src/linux-2.4
do the "make dep && make bzImage && ..."
if it's not enough save your .config file again, remove the whole
kernel-source directory and re-install it (re untar the kerneltar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:22:04 +1000, Richard Garland wrote:
> Posting again because I am not seeing on the list. My humble apologies if I
> have overlooked the 1st post.
>
>
> Trying to compile the kernel to include the drivers for Qlogic HBA cards.
Lance Spence wrote:
>I don't know if my request made it through the first time, so I'm reposting.
>
>Can some one please help me with a kernel build and getting the system to
>boot up completely. I have Redhat 8.0 and have rebuilt the kernel. I've gone
>through the kernel building steps. Grub is
ay, August 13, 2002 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: Kernel compile and ATX PS question
>
> cd /usr/src/linux
>
> make menuconfig
>
> go to the General Setup -> Power Management.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Trevor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[E
Yes, I've looked in here already... (BTW, I'm running 2.2.16).
Thanks.
>cd /usr/src/linux
>make menuconfig
>go to the General Setup -> Power Management.
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:34 PM
Subject: Kerne
cd /usr/src/linux
make menuconfig
go to the General Setup -> Power Management.
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:34 PM
Subject: Kernel compile and ATX PS question
> I recompiled my kernel and everything we
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 23:48, Patrick Beart wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I'm trying to upgrade the kernel version on my laptop.
> Currently, it has the default RH 7.2 kernel (v. 2.4.7-10). However,
> there's a bug in the PnP Bios for that kernel that prevents the
> built-in soundcard on my IBM Thi
> i'm on rh7.3 now.because this version not support my sound card,i have to
> recompile the kernel.two questions below:
> 1.i've got the bzImage file,can i del other files in the /usr/src/linux/?
> 2.after recompile the kernel,i have to shut the power by myself.what
module
> i've missed?
1. first
After you have done your:
make dep
make bzImage
make modules
make modules_install
You then want to do:
cp /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.x
...and as an optional step:
cp /usr/src/linux/System.map /boot/System.map-2.4.x
Now you have to tell lilo what to do with your n
I dont know about the first one, but the second
question you must check for automatic power down. I
think it is on the general setup window.
--- Wei Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > i'm on
rh7.3 now.because this version not support my
> sound card,i have to
> recompile the kernel.two questions b
do make mrproper BUT before you do copy your config file i think it is ( sorry
in windows right now can't check ) somewhere else so not overwritten...then copy
it back and start again..
hth's
lee
Andy Worthington wrote:
> I am having trouble compiling a new kernel. This is a fresh install of
1 12:06 PM
Subject: RE: kernel compile problems
> OK people - how many times do we have to say this:
> SEARCH THE ARCHIVES!!
> This question has been answered (literally) hundreds of times by now.
>
> Andy: Use kgcc instead of gcc is the official answer. Unofficially i
thin
OK people - how many times do we have to say this:
SEARCH THE ARCHIVES!!
This question has been answered (literally) hundreds of times by now.
Andy: Use kgcc instead of gcc is the official answer. Unofficially i think
if you do a "make distclean" then everything should work.
---
> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:35:43 -0500 (EST)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Kernel Compile Error
> From: "Pete Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> OK -- this should be trivial, but I'm getting lost in all the makefile
> variables. A friend was trying to build
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Anton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was succesfully install RedHat 7.0 on my PC, but i'm found error when i try to
>make bzImage. I just adding several TCP/IP options on the kernel options. I found the
>same problem when i try to use kernel-2.2.17.
>
>
What problem are you exa
shortly after I sent this, I tried a make mrproper oldconfig dep and then
it magically worked. The mrproper seems to have done it, since I checked
another 7.0 box (upgraded not clean install) with the same problem, and it
fixed it there too - without changing the Makefile.
I guess the list server
I'm having the same problem. I changed the CC definition to use kgcc
(which is installed), even though mine had some logic that should have
resulted in the same thing anyway, and it made no difference.
What else can I check?
kernelcfg-0.6-9
kernel-headers-2.4.0-0.26
kernel-2.2.16-22
kernel-util
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Mr FW User wrote:
> Hi. I've just installed 7.0 on a blank disk and now
> understand there is a 'kgcc' that must be used to
> compile the kernel. I removed gcc and linked kgcc to
I have a question. Where did 'kgcc' come from? The
core kernel development group, or did it co
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 11:57:24PM -0400, Statux wrote:
: gcc is your standard issue C compiler. Have you ever compiled a kernel
: from tarball?
What he's saying here is that the stock gcc in 7.0 blows up on compiling
kernel 2.2.x, as it is gcc 2.96. This same problem existed with the 2.0
kernel
gcc is your standard issue C compiler. Have you ever compiled a kernel
from tarball?
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Mr FW User wrote:
> > You should be using cc or gcc to compile anything on
> > a redhat system... including the kernel.
>
> Well, apparently this kgcc is specifically designed to
> compile
> You should be using cc or gcc to compile anything on
> a redhat system... including the kernel.
Well, apparently this kgcc is specifically designed to
compile the kernel, due to it being a new version, I
think?
So you're able to compile the kernel using:
cpp-2.96-54
kernel-2.2.16-22
glibc-2.1
Warnings aren't really anything to be all that worried about. If you have a
kernel, just be happy :o)
--MB
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mr FW User
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 06:45:25PM -0700, Mr FW User wrote:
: Hi. I've just installed 7.0 on a blank disk and now
: understand there is a 'kgcc' that must be used to
: compile the kernel. I removed gcc and linked kgcc to
: gcc and cc in /usr/bin. Now, I'm receiving the
: following assembly errors:
> What's going on? The kernel compiles okay, but this
> doesn't give me the warm-and-fuzzy... Why does this
> seem so half-assed?
You should be using cc or gcc to compile anything on a redhat
system... including the kernel.
___
Redhat-list mailing li
The modules problem seems to be that somthing needs a driver that is in the
sound configuration. I disabled sound support and the modules always failed
while compiling radiosomething.o sying it needed something else. I guessed
it was the sound stuff and added it back in and the modules are now
Thanks to all for the input. Makes sense. I thought I would try the modules
again berfore asking for help. I was getting a couple of errors on the make
modules and incorrectly assumed that all were built. None of the ipv4 or net
modules were installed amoung others I am sure. I'll run it agai
Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>after I compile a newly configured kernel using:
>
>make mrproper
>make menuconifg
>make dep
>make clean
>make bzImage
>
>I get a vmlinuz file in /usr/src/linux (2.2.14-5.0)
>and a much smaller file in arch/i386/boot/bzImage
>
>The kernel howto indicates th
Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> after I compile a newly configured kernel using:
>
> make mrproper
> make menuconifg
> make dep
> make clean
> make bzImage
>
> I get a vmlinuz file in /usr/src/linux (2.2.14-5.0)
> and a much smaller file in arch/i386/boot/bzImage
>
> The kernel howto indicates that bzI
>Hello,
>I'm trying to build 2.0.33, but I get this compile error when I do a >"make
>boot". It says as86 not found when compiling bootsect.c (I think i >got
>that right)
>Any suggestions?
>david
Install bin86
Igmar
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES
You probably don't have as86 installed. It's in the bin86 RPM,
bin86-0.4-3 on my system. HTH
Matt
---
Matt Housh email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MicroComputer SpecialistUniversity of Tulsa
I also had this problem, after tinkering around with my mboard I found that the
people who sold it to me had overclocked it, so I changed the jumpers so that
it works as specified. Also turned off the external L-2 cache and Linux
compiled smoothly. (Remember to turn the cache back on after the c
after the switch.. jim mills
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Frisch [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 1998 12:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:Re: Kernel Compile gives sig-11
>
> On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Graham Hemmings wrote:
&g
day, March 26, 1998 7:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Kernel Compile gives sig-11
Would be nice if the rest of us knew what motherboard! Could you divulge?
James W. Mills Jr wrote:
> I had this problem with a kernel compile the only resolution was a
diffrent
> motherbo
, March 25, 1998 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Kernel Compile gives sig-11
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Graham Hemmings wrote:
> Any ideas what I should check? Isn't there a sig-11 list somewhere?
http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11
Sounds like your case may indeed by a
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Graham Hemmings wrote:
> Any ideas what I should check? Isn't there a sig-11 list somewhere?
http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11
Sounds like your case may indeed by a hardware problem...
Mike.
==
Mike Frisch
>Any ideas what I should check? Isn't there a sig-11 list somewhere?
> PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
>http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>
I'll bet your not running lilo after compiling your kernels...
This means you are in fact running your old kernel...I believe it's possible
that your running your old kernel even if you copied your new one on top,
and therefore, your old one no longer exists (at least as a file entry.)
The blocks
46 matches
Mail list logo
