Re: Kernel Size

2002-04-05 Thread Statux
Simply: 1) use bzImage and not zImage 2) If the make processes tells you at the end that the kernel/system is too big, it's too big 3) If, when you update /etc/lilo and run /sbin/lilo to update the MBR, you get some error similar to #2, it's too big 4) Everything else will work :) On Fri, 5 Ap

RE: Kernel Size

2002-04-05 Thread Matthews, John
Are you sure the kernel wouldn't run? It's common to receive a warning that the kernel may be too large, but I believe that warning applies to older systems or floppy boot disks. The kernel is the file /arch/i386/boot/bzImage. That's assuming your building for a i386 platform. On my mac

Re: Kernel size limit ??

1998-03-11 Thread David E. Fox
> >This is my first foray into the world of Linux kernel building. I have > built kernels > for other commercial unix systems, without any real problems.I noticed > that > I built a kernel that was too big. I think it was 1.2 meg. Why is this > too big? Well, the build process

RE: Kernel size limit ??

1998-03-11 Thread Tempel, Philippe
> In my understanding, the kernel size is limited by the size of the > master-boot-record, > [PT] Nope. It is due to the size of the Intel processor's real mode versus its protected mode. All PC clones still boot into real mode (640KB) because the BIOS is still

Re: Kernel size limit ??

1998-03-10 Thread Norbert Klaus
Dear Greg, In my understanding, the kernel size is limited by the size of the master-boot-record, because part of your kernel gets stored there (LILO) in order to enable you to boot. What you could try is using "make bzImage" instead of "make zImage" this should do the trick. If you realy need a