Re: ipchains problem

2003-02-03 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 16:44:00 -0800 (PST), exits funnel wrote: > > Yes. And reply packets are not covered at all by > > that rule. And > > without knowing the complete set of rules, one > > cannot comment on > > this single rule anyway. > > Actually, s

Re: ipchains problem

2003-02-02 Thread gabriel
On February 2, 2003 07:15 pm, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Yes. And reply packets are not covered at all by that rule. And > without knowing the complete set of rules, one cannot comment on > this single rule anyway. The output of ipchains-save would be the > least I would like to see. Btw, opening al

Re: ipchains problem

2003-02-02 Thread exits funnel
> Yes. And reply packets are not covered at all by > that rule. And > without knowing the complete set of rules, one > cannot comment on > this single rule anyway. Actually, since my insert was to position 1 and my target was ACCEPT, how could other input rules have any affect? Or am I confused a

Re: ipchains problem

2003-02-02 Thread exits funnel
--- gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On February 2, 2003 11:43 am, exits funnel wrote: > > ipchains -I input -p tcp -s 192.145.23.101 --sport > > 1:1024 -d 192.145.23.102 --dport 1:1024 -j ACCEPT > > i think the problem stems from the fact that you're > only allowing unlimited > traffic on u

Re: ipchains problem

2003-02-02 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 16:58:24 -0500, gabriel wrote: > On February 2, 2003 11:43 am, exits funnel wrote: > > ipchains -I input -p tcp -s 192.145.23.101 --sport > > 1:1024 -d 192.145.23.102 --dport 1:1024 -j ACCEPT > > i think the problem stems from the

Re: ipchains problem

2003-02-02 Thread gabriel
On February 2, 2003 11:43 am, exits funnel wrote: > ipchains -I input -p tcp -s 192.145.23.101 --sport > 1:1024 -d 192.145.23.102 --dport 1:1024 -j ACCEPT i think the problem stems from the fact that you're only allowing unlimited traffic on unpriviledged ports (i can't spell). if you want to al

RE: IPCHAINS problem

2002-08-25 Thread Joe Giles
Thanks a million. I am posting my IPCHIANS file as found in /etc/sysconfig Thanks again for looking at this. This has been driving me nuts :)... -F input -F output -F forward # ANTI-SPOOFING -A input -p all -j DENY -s 10.0.0.0/8 -i eth0 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -A input -p all -j DENY -s 127.0.0.0/8 -i eth

Re: IPCHAINS problem

2002-08-25 Thread Pieter De Wit
Hello Joe, I have followed your prev. post. I use RedHat (7.2 upgraded to 7.3) with ipchains. This box handles about 500 - 1000 Meg of NAT (MASQ) traffic a day. If you would like, you can post your rules to me in private and I will have a look at them. Maybe somewhere there is a "loop" somewhere