Re: Hoo-Hoo! Sound in Linux!

1998-06-02 Thread Joe Klemmer
On 2 Jun 1998, Eze Ogwuma wrote: > > > The sad thing is that it costs $20 for Linux. > > > > That's not a sad thing. That's a happy thing. Commercial > > applications/software is not bad. Everything doesn't have to be free. > > $20 for a utility that good is a steal. > > I thought that $

Re: Hoo-Hoo! Sound in Linux!

1998-06-02 Thread Ray Curtis
> "eo" == Eze Ogwuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: eo> Joe Klemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Piet Barber wrote: >> >> > The sad thing is that it costs $20 for Linux. >> >> That's not a sad thing. That's a happy thing. Commercial >> applications/software is not bad.

Re: Hoo-Hoo! Sound in Linux!

1998-06-02 Thread Eze Ogwuma
Joe Klemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Piet Barber wrote: > > > The sad thing is that it costs $20 for Linux. > > That's not a sad thing. That's a happy thing. Commercial > applications/software is not bad. Everything doesn't have to be free. > $20 for a utility

Re: Hoo-Hoo! Sound in Linux!

1998-06-01 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Piet Barber wrote: > The sad thing is that it costs $20 for Linux. That's not a sad thing. That's a happy thing. Commercial applications/software is not bad. Everything doesn't have to be free. $20 for a utility that good is a steal. --- "Do not meddle in the affa