RE: CitrixICA for linux

2000-01-19 Thread Patrick O Neil
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 11:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: recipient.list.not.shown Subject: Re: CitrixICA for linux What about requesting the mail directly to the NT machine? (i.e. configuring a POP3 entry at KMAIL) > If I remember, this has to do with a setting

RE: CitrixICA for linux

2000-01-19 Thread Patrick O Neil
TED]] Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 6:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: recipient.list.not.shown Subject: Re: CitrixICA for linux Patrick O Neil wrote: > Someone spent a lot of time trying to guess/crack pop3 passwords. > Their response was to eliminate pop3 and imap to boot. So what you're

Re: CitrixICA for linux

2000-01-19 Thread Dave Ihnat
Patrick O Neil wrote: > Someone spent a lot of time trying to guess/crack pop3 passwords. > Their response was to eliminate pop3 and imap to boot. So what you're saying is that the cracker perpetrated a successful long-term denial-of-service attack--with the help of the IT department. > In any

Re: CitrixICA for linux

2000-01-19 Thread gpt Guillermo Pastor Torrente
What about requesting the mail directly to the NT machine? (i.e. configuring a POP3 entry at KMAIL) > If I remember, this has to do with a setting on the server side ( NT > running Citrix ). > I don't excatly recall the solution, but they basically had to "fix" or > re-install the > server side

Re: CitrixICA for linux

2000-01-17 Thread sparsi
If I remember, this has to do with a setting on the server side ( NT running Citrix ). I don't excatly recall the solution, but they basically had to "fix" or re-install the server side. May have to do with the way NT/Citrix does things with your profile ( by default - roaming, and set to save