Hi David,
> What do people do in chicken-and-egg situations like this? I'm all ears for a
> solution (a pointer to an appropriate net.resource is fine, too).
Just out of curiosity, I tried this at home :-). It didn't kill me nor my 6.2
firewall. (I used my backup partition, jus
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, John N. Alegre wrote:
> will work for packages that are mutually dependent. But when I tried this with
> rpm and glibc going from RedHat 5.2 > 6.0 the exact thing Thomas is pointing
> out happened and it took me a week to get the system back to where it was to
> begin with.
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, John N. Alegre wrote:
> I will try to be less RUDE here, but I am getting tired of people answering
> this problem with answers that they have not tried.
>
> Kyrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The solution is to use the go-between version of RPM from the 3.x
> > version
I will try to be less RUDE here, but I am getting tired of people answering
this problem with answers that they have not tried.
Kyrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The solution is to use the go-between version of RPM from the 3.x
> versions [ version 3.0.5 ] which is capable of reading RPM v4 fo
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, David Ruggiero wrote:
>
> Today's fun and games:
>
> Okay, so I want to upgrade to the newest version of "patch", which I
> apparently need for some of the latest-and-greatest kernel patches. (This
> is for my firewall machine - generic RH6.2 with a fairly-current 2.2.17
Hi,
The solution is to use the go-between version of RPM from the 3.x
versions [ version 3.0.5 ] which is capable of reading RPM v4 format
files, AFAIK.
K.
Here's the bulk of the RedHat advisory I believe explains it:-
-
Rude "John N. Alegre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been following this thread carefully because I am having the same
problem.
you can follow things??
i can see you have problems.
comments:
"eric clover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> man rpm
>
No clue here. The guy does not even understa
I have been following this thread carefully because I am having the same
problem.
comments:
"eric clover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> man rpm
>
No clue here. The guy does not even understand the problem.
"Burke, Thomas G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try rpm -Fvh foo
>
and
[EMAIL PROTEC
Nope, F == freshen (i.e. only install if there's an older version already) -f is force
but --nodeps is probably what you're looking for anyway.
JW
At 02:06 PM 11/29/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Try rpm -Fvh foo
>
>The F switch forces the installation, I believe.
>
>> -Original Message---
man rpm
INSTALL AND UPGRADE OPTIONS
The general form of an rpm install command is
rpm -i [install-options] +
This installs a new package. The general form of an rpm upgrade
command is
rpm -U [install-options] +
This upgrades or installs the packag
Try rpm -Fvh foo
The F switch forces the installation, I believe.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Ruggiero [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 2:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Chicken-and-egg problem with glibc and rpm
>
> Today's fun and ga
11 matches
Mail list logo
