Re: RPM apache+php v. source apache+php]

2002-04-12 Thread Jeff Bearer
Good point, thanks David. On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 17:07, David Talkington wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Talkington wrote: > > >>For those of you that are of the mindset that everyone should compile > >>everything from source, that's duly noted, but I'd rather

Re: RPM apache+php v. source apache+php]

2002-04-11 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Talkington wrote: >>For those of you that are of the mindset that everyone should compile >>everything from source, that's duly noted, but I'd rather hear from >>people who weigh out the benefits of using one or the other and go with >>the best

Re: RPM apache+php v. source apache+php]

2002-04-11 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeff Bearer wrote: >What is your opinion of using Red Hat's Apache and PHP binaries instead >of compiling from source? If Red hat is too specific for this list we >can expand it, but that is the binary that I'm interested in seeing how >it stacks up

RPM apache+php v. source apache+php]

2002-04-11 Thread Jeff Bearer
I sent this to the PHP list and got no response so far, it's also on topic for this list, so lets see if I can get some discussion going here. At least I don't have to worry about the first paragraph with this list. -Forwarded Message- This is a tough question to ask because I know the