On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:44:33 -0800
Jim Wilferling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 19:30:49 -0800
> Jack Bowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 01:32:38PM -0800, Jim Wilferling wrote:
> > >
> > > OOps, I spoke too soon. while plain rpm worked, synaptic
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 19:30:49 -0800
Jack Bowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 01:32:38PM -0800, Jim Wilferling wrote:
> >
> > OOps, I spoke too soon. while plain rpm worked, synaptic still caused RPM to
> > segfault "error:sub-process /bin/rpm returned a segmentation fau
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 01:32:38PM -0800, Jim Wilferling wrote:
>
> OOps, I spoke too soon. while plain rpm worked, synaptic still caused RPM to
> segfault "error:sub-process /bin/rpm returned a segmentation fault"
>Any help?
Probably a stale lock in the apt tree. Do:
rm /var/apt/cache/ar
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 12:48:58 -0800
Jim Wilferling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
> I was trying to install the "Phoebe" rpms last night, using Apt and
> Synaptic, and being extremely concious of wierd cross-dependencies, thought I
> was doing fine. But at one point apt and synapt
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:19:25 -0800
Jim Wilferling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 12:48:58 -0800
> Jim Wilferling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >I was trying to install the "Phoebe" rpms last night, using Apt and
> > Synaptic, and being extremely concious o
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 12:48:58 -0800
Jim Wilferling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
> I was trying to install the "Phoebe" rpms last night, using Apt and
> Synaptic, and being extremely concious of wierd cross-dependencies, thought I
> was doing fine. But at one point apt and synapt
Folks,
I was trying to install the "Phoebe" rpms last night, using Apt and
Synaptic, and being extremely concious of wierd cross-dependencies, thought I
was doing fine. But at one point apt and synaptic quit working properly, though
I stayed completelty away from u.g.'ing them and
