RE: gcc3

2002-07-12 Thread Rob Emanuele
Where does RawHide live? ftp server, directory, etc. Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ABrady Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: gcc3 On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:45:36 -0700 "Rob Ema

Re: gcc3

2002-07-11 Thread ABrady
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:45:36 -0700 "Rob Emanuele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are the Gcc3 packages in Redhat 7.3? They were in 7.2. > > Thanks, > > Rob No. And no. I installed it from Rawhide right after I installed 7.3. I don't know how well it would work now since that was a little bit ba

Re: GCC3? -- Still Confused

2001-11-28 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
"Matthews, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:09 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: GCC3? > >"Matthews, Joh

Re: GCC3? -- Still Confused

2001-11-28 Thread Hal Burgiss
> I'd like to know what versions of GCC other people on the list are > using. [hal@feenix hal]$ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/specs gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-98) Hmmm [hal@feenix hal]$ rpm -q --last gcc gcc-2.96-98

RE: GCC3? -- Still Confused

2001-11-28 Thread Matthews, John
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:09 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: GCC3? >"Matthews, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I was under the assumption that GC

Re: GCC3?

2001-11-26 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
"Matthews, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was under the assumption that GCC 3.0.2 or GCC 2.95.3 would be the > best bets for stability. I thought that the use of GCC 2.96 was > discouraged. The other way round. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. ___

RE: GCC3?

2001-11-26 Thread Matthews, John
] Subject: Re: GCC3? "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has anyone installed gcc3 from rawhide on a 7.1 system yet? Any > caveats, broken bones, beheading...anything? gcc 3 is known to have a few problems, it's there for ones wanting to experiment.

Re: GCC3?

2001-11-26 Thread Wally Brock
no problems here :-) Wally Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > Has anyone installed gcc3 from rawhide on a 7.1 system yet? Any > caveats, broken bones, beheading...anything? > > -- > H | "Life is the art of drawing without an eraser." - John Gardner > +--