Re: Bugbear virus?

2003-07-26 Thread Tom Pollerman
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 21:44:08 -0500 MKlinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 26 July 2003 19:10, Tom Pollerman wrote: > > Hello, > > I just received the e-mail below. The file attachment scans > > positive for the Bugbear virus by F-prot. > > > > /root/Mail/inbox/448->emails.doc.pif

Re: Bugbear virus?

2003-07-26 Thread MKlinke
On Saturday 26 July 2003 19:10, Tom Pollerman wrote: > Hello, > I just received the e-mail below. The file attachment scans > positive for the Bugbear virus by F-prot. > > /root/Mail/inbox/448->emails.doc.pif Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I've sent a message about it to Nick White. >

Re: Bugbear virus?

2003-07-26 Thread Tom Pollerman
On 26 Jul 2003 21:18:37 -0400 Ricky Boone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 20:10, Tom Pollerman wrote: > > Hello, > > I just received the e-mail below. The file attachment scans > > positive for the Bugbear virus by F-prot. > > > > /root/Mail/inbox/448->emails.doc.pif Inf

Re: Bugbear virus?

2003-07-26 Thread Ricky Boone
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 20:10, Tom Pollerman wrote: > Hello, > I just received the e-mail below. The file attachment scans > positive for the Bugbear virus by F-prot. > > /root/Mail/inbox/448->emails.doc.pif Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I've sent a message about it to Nick White. >

RE: bugbear

2003-06-06 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 21:48, Cowles, Steve wrote: > I have not seen the bugbear virus from this list, but trendmico is showing a > new strain of bugbear making a comeback: > Steve Cowles I've been graced enough to receive both the Sobig and Bugbear - but I actually find it rather amusing that it

Re: bugbear

2003-06-06 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 21:30, Martin Moss wrote: > Is bugbear doing the rounds again? > I'm getting several messages from people on this list with bugbear attached? > > Marty It's a new variation, and it's dragging Windows boxes down along with the networks that they live on. -- Sat Jun 7 08:35:

Re: bugbear

2003-06-06 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:30:30PM +0100, Martin Moss wrote: > > Is bugbear doing the rounds again? > I'm getting several messages from people on this list with bugbear attached? It's actually bugbear.b, a variant of the original but yes, it has started spreading. Emmanuel -- redhat-list maili

Re: bugbear

2003-06-06 Thread Martin Mewes
Hi all, Our eMail-scanner sucessfully mounted 245 BugBears to /dev/null between 08.00 and 14.00 CEST :-) kind regards Martin Mewes -- # RedHat MailList FAQhttp://www.reznet.uleth.ca/faq/ # # Deutsche Übersetzung http://www.mamemu.de/faq/redhat-list-german/ # # Official Releas

Re: bugbear

2003-06-06 Thread Gary Stainburn
On Friday 06 Jun 2003 12:30 pm, Martin Moss wrote: > Is bugbear doing the rounds again? > I'm getting several messages from people on this list with bugbear > attached? It's a new varient - BugBear-B. Many of the anti-virus houses already have patches for it. Also, common sense settings on (Lin

RE: bugbear

2003-06-06 Thread Cowles, Steve
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Moss > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 6:31 AM > Subject: bugbear > > Is bugbear doing the rounds again? > I'm getting several messages from people on this list with > bugbear attached? I have not seen the bugbear virus from this list, but trendmico is sho

RE: bugbear

2003-06-06 Thread Cannon, Andrew
Yes. It has been classed as a level 4 (with 5 being the highest) threat by Symantec and 'High' by McAffee. -Original Message- From: Martin Moss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bugbear Is bugbear doing the rounds again? I'm ge