Hi Stephen,
> Thanks for your information. I heard VMWare for quite long time but to my
> understanding it is not from Opensource. That means it is not free. If I
> am wrong please correct me.
That's right it is commercial software (US$99 for personal use) but when a
product works THIS well I
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2000 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: windows emulator
> IMHO the best one to date is to run VMWare for Linux. Although you still
> need a (legal) copy of Windows to run it. It will run anything from Win
95
> to Win2K and ev
Yeah.. it's called MS Windows.. this is UNIX.. DOS/Windows is garbage :)
Seriously, though.. try Wine.
-Statux
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
+
The Rules Have Changed...Be paid to Surf the Web!
http://au.nz.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=OMP682
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2000 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: windows emulator
> Yes. I
9, 2000 2:57 AM
Subject: Re: windows emulator
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Burke, Thomas G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Friday, August 18, 2000 12:51 PM
> Subject: RE: windows emulator
>
>
> &g
-Original Message-
From: Burke, Thomas G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, August 18, 2000 12:51 PM
Subject: RE: windows emulator
>It's called WINE
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: G
It's called WINE
> -Original Message-
> From: GEOFF SELKIRK [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 11:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: windows emulator
>
> Hellooo
>
> Does anyone know where to find an emulator to run windows programs in
> redhat 6.0?
>
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
> Well, my main problem about wine is that I still don't know what it
> can actually run or not. Almost anything that was of interest to me
> would NOT run. I checked on the "success lists" and I could never run
> what was suposedly ok on the list.
Well, my main problem about wine is that I still don't know what it can actually run
or not. Almost anything that was of interest to me would NOT run.
I checked on the "success lists" and I could never run what was suposedly ok on the
list. Probably one of the options you need to tweak but it
The thing that would help a lot of people out would be for wine to output to
a log file with a list of files that the program *tried* to access. All too
many times, a program would give a vague error without telling you what .dll
or file it tried to access. Some gueswork is involved and when you
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Patrick O Neil wrote:
> I've got the wine src rpm from rawhide powertools. I rebuilt it
> without difficulty but I cannot install it.
wine-2202-1 is known broken. wine-2202-2 is the good one.
It should appear on rawhide soon (it's been in the devel tree for 2 days)
02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Windows emulator
I've got the wine src rpm from rawhide powertools. I rebuilt it
without difficulty but I cannot install it. When I try to install
I get a VERY long list of dependencies for things like lib
wine-2202? Compiling
the wine source produces both wine-2202 and wine-devel
-2202.
-Original Message-
From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 9:23 AM
To: Ryan Marinoff
Cc: recipient.list.not.shown
Subject: Re: Windows emulator
About the remark you make about undocumented API : doesn't it make Wine
useless somehow if we cannot run M$ stuff on it because they don't release the docs.
If I am to use any M$ stuff it is mainly for compatibility pbs with word or excel
documents coming from 3rd parties and such (staroffice
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Bret Hughes wrote:
> Does wine work for the 32 bit stuff?
Yes.
> Say office 97.
Doesn't work.
M$ use a lot of undocumented functions in their tools, and without reverse
engineering (which would be illegal :/ ), we can't duplicate undocumented
APIs.
> When I first heard
>
Ryan Marinoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 10:16 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: recipient.list.not.shown
Subject: RE: Windows emulator
If I do this, then it would be legit? As in would I still need a 'license
from microsoft'?
-Original
Does wine work for the 32 bit stuff? Say office 97. When I first heard
of it a couple of years ago there was no support for anything other than
windows 3.1 stuff. Is it worth looking into?
Bret
Ryan Marinoff wrote:
>
> >From what I understand, for wine to work properly you must have windows
>
RE: Windows emulator
It is not absolutely true that you must have windoze
installed for wine to work. The deal is, wine contains
a set of its own versions of many windoze files. They
are not quite up to "snuff" in many cases to the actual
It is not absolutely true that you must have windoze
installed for wine to work. The deal is, wine contains
a set of its own versions of many windoze files. They
are not quite up to "snuff" in many cases to the actual
windoze counterparts. If you have a real version of
windoze installed, you
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Ryan Marinoff wrote:
> >From what I understand, for wine to work properly you must have windows
> itself installed and wine uses the api's from there. Is there an emulator
> of windows that I can use that I don't need to have a registered copy of
> windows?
Yes, wine. wine m
20 matches
Mail list logo
