RE: VPN masq

2002-11-28 Thread bruma
PPTP, because I think that MS servers/clients use that protocol. > > What type of VPN? IPSec? PPTP? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 9:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: VPN masq > > > I'm running

RE: VPN masq

2002-11-28 Thread Cameron . Davidson
$PPTP_SERVER -j ACCEPT But IPSEC will be something different. Cameron. > -Original Message- > From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 28 November 2002 05:08 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: VPN masq > > > That's correct. Basic

Re: VPN masq

2002-11-28 Thread Edward Dekkers
> I have tried to unsubscribe myself 10 times, both by replying to the > auto address as well as by emailing the human./ No reuslt, I still get > this stuff. If you're that desperate, you should have read the archives - this has been answered at least ten times!!! Use the second link below - scro

RE: VPN masq

2002-11-27 Thread mvw
ules are: > > -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE > -A FORWARD -s 192.168.10.0/24 -o eth1 -j ACCEPT > > -Steve > > -Original Message- > From: Simpson, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:53 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' &

RE: VPN masq

2002-11-27 Thread rwcs1br
ssage- > From: Rigler, S C (Steve) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:40 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: VPN masq > > > No. > > The redhat box is dual homed, and is firewalling a > small (3 node) network. > The

RE: VPN masq

2002-11-27 Thread Rigler, S C (Steve)
ieve the affecting rules are: -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE -A FORWARD -s 192.168.10.0/24 -o eth1 -j ACCEPT -Steve -Original Message- From: Simpson, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:53 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: VPN masq T

RE: VPN masq

2002-11-27 Thread Simpson, Doug
The VPN client is part of your three node network, yes? It is VPNing to another network? Thanks, Doug -Original Message- From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN masq No. The redhat box is

RE: VPN masq

2002-11-27 Thread Rigler, S C (Steve)
ECTED]' Subject: RE: VPN masq Steve, Do you have a roadwarrior setup? Doug -Original Message- From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN masq I've been doing this successfully since RH 7.1

RE: VPN masq

2002-11-27 Thread Simpson, Doug
Steve, Do you have a roadwarrior setup? Doug -Original Message- From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN masq I've been doing this successfully since RH 7.1 using iptables and no pa

RE: VPN masq

2002-11-27 Thread Rechenberg, Andrew
What type of VPN? IPSec? PPTP? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 9:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN masq I'm running Red HAT 7.3 (2.4.18-18.7.x) as gateway between internal net and Internet. I use NAT masq

RE: VPN masq

2002-11-27 Thread Rigler, S C (Steve)
I've been doing this successfully since RH 7.1 using iptables and no patches. AFAIK, there is no patch available to do this with ipchains on 2.4 kernel. If I remember correctly, the patch only applied to 2.2 kernels using ipchains. I'm not sure of the limitations of iptables and VPN traffic si

Re: vpn masq builtin to kernels yet?

2002-10-29 Thread Jason Costomiris
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:02:10AM +, gregory mott wrote: : is vpn masq builtin to any kernels yet, or must one still follow the : instructions in the VPN-Masquerade-HOWTO-2? No longer applies.. netfilter (been in there since 2.3.something) handles masq'ing of pptp easily. Most IPSec clients