TECTED]]On Behalf Of Nick White
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:19 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Slapper Worm on openssl 0.9.6b(-28)
>From the changelog: (via rpm -q --changelog)
* Thu Aug 01 2002 Nalin Dahyabhai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.9.6b-28
- update asn patch
al Message-
From: Trevor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Slapper Worm on openssl 0.9.6b(-28)
"rpm -q --changelog openssl | grep ASN" can tell you the same thing...
without the tech support .
Trevor.
-Orig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Nick White posted the following:
NW>That's exactly why I contacted RedHat... They don't have information
NW>anywhere about the worm on their web site.
I dunno why but this satisfied my curiosity:
http://www.redhat.com/support
Subject: RE: Slapper Worm on openssl 0.9.6b(-28)
That's exactly why I contacted RedHat... They don't have information
anywhere about the worm on their web site. I received a response back from
a higher level tech support person at RedHat confirming that the up2date
openssl package 0.9
That's exactly why I contacted RedHat... They don't have information
anywhere about the worm on their web site. I received a response back from
a higher level tech support person at RedHat confirming that the up2date
openssl package 0.9.6b-28 is safe. (see RedHat's response below)
Dear Sir,
We
